With
Bradley W. Harrison,
C. Kevin Marshall,
Charles R.A. Morse
The Texas Supreme Court is scheduled to review reliance disclaimer clauses and their enforceability in December 2018 and may provide further guidance on these issues.
With
Antonio Dias
On June 12, New York's highest court ruled in a 4-1 decision that Martin Act claims are subject to a three-year statute of limitations, rejecting the New York Attorney General's argument for a six-year limit, and overruling two lower courts' decisions.
With
Lee Armstrong,
Thomas Demitrack,
William Dolan,
Jeffrey R. Johnson
In a much-anticipated decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has set aside the FCC's 2015 Declaratory Ruling, which broadly interpreted the TCPA's restrictions...
With
Benjamin M. Flowers
This Jones Day White Paper reviews the Court's most relevant decisions of the 2016–2017 Term and analyzes their possible effects on the business community.
With
Willis Goldsmith,
Jessica Kastin
Employers have not been generally successful under Specialty Healthcare when attempting to broaden petitioned-for bargaining units.
The Bankruptcy Code embodies the basic policy of affording relief to only the honest but unfortunate debtor.
With
Louis Chaiten,
Darren Cottriel,
Amanda Parker,
Sharyl A. Reisman
The Supreme Court in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, No. 14-587 (Jan. 20, 2016), held that a defendant's unaccepted offer to fully satisfy the plaintiff's claim does not moot the plaintiff's case.
With
Louis Chaiten,
Darren Cottriel,
Sharyl A. Reisman
The Supreme Court in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, No. 14-587 (Jan. 20, 2016), held that a defendant's unaccepted offer to fully satisfy the plaintiff's claim does not moot the plaintiff's case.
With
Louis Chaiten,
Darren Cottriel,
Amanda Parker,
Sharyl A. Reisman
The Supreme Court in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, No. 14-587 (Jan. 20, 2016), held that a defendant's unaccepted offer to fully satisfy the plaintiff's claim does not moot the plaintiff's case.
With
Cynthia H. Cwik,
Michael Ginsberg,
Gregory Gordon,
Elli Leibenstein,
Traci Lovitt,
Barbara Mack Harding,
Charles Moellenberg Jr.,
Sharyl A. Reisman
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has held that removal to federal court of an asbestos suit for liabilities based on products delivered to an agency of the United States government is appropriate.
With
Meir Feder,
Edwin L. Fountain,
James Gauch,
Charles Kotuby Jr.,
David Strandness
The United States is an attractive forum for plaintiffs to challenge the actions of foreign states, due to U.S. courts' liberal discovery rules, higher damage awards, availability of class actions, and the absence of "loser pay" rules, but foreign states are generally immune from civil suits.
With
Thomas Beck,
Thomas Beck,
Thomas Beck,
Thomas Beck,
Thomas Davis,
Thomas Davis,
Thomas Davis,
Thomas Davis,
Alison Marshall,
Alison Marshall,
Alison Marshall,
Alison Marshall
The Supreme Court granted certiorari recently in Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White, a case expected to decide what constitutes employer liability under the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Based on Mondaq users readership, this author is ranked as Very Popular in United States for the topics, user groups and industry sectors listed below:
Topics
Consumer LawConsumer ProtectionMedia, Telecoms, IT, EntertainmentTelecoms, Mobile & Cable CommunicationsIndustry
Banking & Credit* Rankings are based on analysis of the last 12 months of Mondaq readership data across more than 25,000 contributing authors. To be ranked ‘Very Popular’ an author must be in the top 20% of results within the selected criteria.
