The Department of Justice's Antitrust Division continues to ramp up its private litigation amicus program after vowing to be more involved ...

Evolving antitrust treatment of so-called "no-poach" agreements continues to offer important guidance for company counsel and human resources professionals.

Matching expectations, 2018 was an active year filled with contentious merger reviews, increased civil/criminal enforcement actions, and pivotal policy shifts.

THE SUPREME COURT'S 2018 term got underway on October 1, with the media spotlight focused on the naming of a successor to Justice Anthony M. Kennedy.

On Nov. 26, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in a potentially landmark antitrust case: Apple v. Pepper, 846 F.3d 313 (9th Cir. 2017), cert. granted, 138 S. Ct. 2647 (2018) (No. 17-204)

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently announced that it will hold a series of public hearings examining whether changes in the economy

The average amount of time the antitrust agencies spend reviewing significant mergers has ballooned in recent years.

On October 26, 2018, Justice Gerald W. Connolly of the New York Supreme Court for Albany County ruled in White v. Cuomo (Index No. 5861-16) that New York's 2016 authorization of fantasy sports violated the state constitution.

In recent weeks, Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson has continued to expand his efforts to eradicate the use of no-poach agreements by employers.

Even though Congress failed to enact meaningful antitrust reform this session, lawmakers in both parties proposed legislation that could significantly alter elements of current law and process

With confirmation hearings looming for DC Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump's Supreme Court nominee to replace retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy, senators will prepare to probe...