India: Remedies To An Unstamped Arbitration Agreement

Last Updated: 3 July 2019
Article by Ashima Obhan and Shivam Patanjali

The theory of separability for arbitration agreements has been developed over time. It has been well recognized in India and other jurisdictions that an arbitration clause in a contract is an agreement independent of the contract executed between the parties. This theory of separability of an arbitration agreement has well elucidated by the Supreme Court of India in the case of M/S Sms Tea Estates P.Ltd v. M/S Chandmari Tea Co. P.Ltd1 which summarized this theory of separability as follows:

"When a contract contains an arbitration agreement, it is a collateral term relating to the resolution of disputes, unrelated to the performance of the contract. It is as if two contracts — one in regard to the substantive terms of the main contract and the other relating to resolution of disputes — had been rolled into one, for purposes of convenience."

To illustrate better, if there is an agreement to transfer immovable property and the agreement contains an arbitration agreement, then in that scenario, the arbitration agreement would be a collateral term relating to the resolution of a dispute that arises out of that agreement and would not affect the transaction taking place. However, there are certain instances when the arbitration clause cannot be separated from the contract, and one of those instances is the requirement of stamp duty payment. This article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding on the remedies available to a person under an unstamped arbitration agreement.


Under Section 33 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter referred to as the "Stamp Act"), there is a duty upon every court, or arbitrator before whom an unregistered contract chargeable with duty is produced, to examine the contract in order to ascertain whether it is duly stamped. Under the Stamp Act, a contract that is not duly stamped is inadmissible in evidence and therefore cannot be acted upon2. This can even lead to the document being impounded.

Under most High Court rules, there is a requirement when approaching the High Court for the appointment of an arbitrator to submit either the original arbitration agreement or a duly certified copy along with the Section 11 application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). If what is produced is a certified copy of the contract containing the arbitration clause, it should disclose the stamp duty that has been paid on the original.


The Supreme Court in M/S Sms Tea Estates P.Ltd v. M/S Chandmari Tea Co. P.Ltd had the opportunity to examine what would happen if the arbitration agreement was not duly stamped.

The Supreme Court held that a court before admitting any contract into evidence or acting

upon the contract, needs to examine whether the contract has been duly stamped. If the contract is found to be not duly stamped, therefore as a result of Section 35 of the Stamp Act, the court cannot act upon the contract that has been submitted. As a result, the arbitration clause despite the theory of separability cannot be acted upon, as the contract in its entirety has to be examined for the purpose of Stamp Duty. It was held that the court can only treat the contract as duly stamped only when the deficit stamp duty and penalty is paid, either before the court or before the Collector as per the procedure laid down under Section 35 or 40 of the Stamp Act, and the defect with reference to deficit stamp is cured.

The principles laid down by the Supreme Court in M/S Sms Tea Estates P.Ltd v. M/S Chandmari Tea Co. P.Ltd was reiterated in Black Pearls Hotels Private Ltd. v. Planet M. Retail Ltd.3


On October 23, 2015, on the basis of the 246th Law Commission Report, the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the "Amendment Act") came into force. The Amendment Act brought about a lot of changes, amongst them was the insertion of Section 11(6A). Prior to the insertion of Section 11 (6A), the powers granted under Section 11 were extremely wide. It has been well established that the appointment of an arbitrator is not merely an administrative power, but it is a judicial power. The Supreme Court in the case of S.B.P. & Co. v. Patel Engineering Ltd. and Anr. had held that the courts while hearing a Section 11 application, would have the power to "entertain the request the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, the existence or otherwise of a live claim, the existence of the condition for the exercise of his power and on the qualifications of the arbitrator or arbitrators."

With the insertion of Section 11 (6A), the powers to determine of a court while hearing a Section 11 application were restrained and were to be confined to the existence of an arbitration agreement. The Supreme Court through the decision in M/s Duro Felguera v. Gangavaram Port Ltd4 after a reading of Section 11 (6A) made it clear that the intention of the legislature was to minimize the Court's intervention at the stage of appointing the arbitrator and hence as a result of Section 11 (6A), the Courts should only look into one aspect, which is the existence of an arbitration agreement.


Bombay High Court's view

On April 04, 2019, the Bombay High Court in the case of Gautam Landscapes Private Ltd. and Ors v. Shailesh S. Shah and Ors had to decide on two issues: (i) whether interim relief can be entertained or granted when a document containing arbitration clause is unstamped or insufficiently stamped; and (ii) in view of Section 11 (6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, inserted by Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2016, it would be necessary for the Court before considering and passing final orders on an application under Section 11(6) of the Act to await the adjudication by the stamp authorities, in a case where the document objected to, is not adequately stamped.

While answering the issue of whether under a Section 9 application, a Court can grant interim relief if the contract containing is the arbitration clause is unstamped, the Bombay High Court held that the right conferred under Section 9 to a party to approach the court would not be of a nature of a right under a contract. Under Section 9 of the Act, the party must establish that there was an arbitration agreement and the applicant was party to the same.

The Bombay High Court recognized the theory of separability and observed that the consequence of not granting ad-interim or interim reliefs in an application under Section 9 of the Act before the commencement of arbitral proceedings would cause severe hardship if the Court decided to wait for the contract to be stamped and not act upon the Section 9 application. Under the Stamp Act defect of non-payment of stamp duty is not an incurable defect. It can be cured at any stage before it is admitted in evidence. The Bombay High Court was further of the opinion that since the Supreme Court decision in M/S Sms Tea Estates P.Ltd v. M/S Chandmari Tea Co. P.Ltd, pertained to an issue under Section 11 of the Act, the principles laid down would not be applicable to an application under Section 9 of the Act, and a Court could grant interim relief under Section 9 even if the contract was not duly stamped.

While deciding the second issue, the Bombay High Court focussed on the intention of the legislature while passing the Amendment Act. A reliance was placed on Section 11(13) of the Act, which was inserted through the Amendment Act, which stipulates that an application under Section 11 must be disposed within a period of sixty days from the date of service of notice on the opposite party. The Bombay High Court observed that the intention of the legislature was to ensure the speedy disposal of arbitration cases with minimum court intervention for the legislature was concerned with the increase in interference by courts in arbitration cases. The Bombay High Court held that when the court adjudicates an application under Section 11 of the Act, the ambit of the inquiry as a result of Section 11(6A) now confined only to the examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties and if such an agreement exists, the disputes which are falling within the scope of the agreement would be required to be referred for adjudication by appointing an arbitral tribunal.

Given that the Stamp Act is a fiscal statute and its purpose is collection of revenue, the Bombay High Court was of the opinion that the purpose would be achieved by impounding the document and sending it to the stamp authorities if it is found to be insufficiently stamped. The courts by waiting for the outcome of the adjudication of the opinion would be restricted in exercising their jurisdiction under the Act and the ends of justice would not be met. Therefore, it was held by adopting a balance approach, keeping in mind the legislative intent and the view adopted by the Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court held that a party need not be put to a disadvantage merely on the basis of sufficient stamp duty not being paid on the contract, before considering and passing final order under section 11(6), and the Courts need not wait for adjudication by the stamp authorities to decide a Section 11 application either.

Supreme Court's view

Within a week of the Bombay High Court's verdict, the Supreme Court passed its decision in Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd5.

The Supreme Court while deciding the issue held that when a court while entertaining a Section 11 application finds the contract to be unstamped, the courts are bound by the provisions of the Stamp Act to first impound the contract see that stamp duty and penalty (if any) is paid before the agreement, as a whole, can be acted upon. Therefore, it is not possible to separate the arbitration clause contained in such a contract. While examining the definition of an arbitration agreement under Section 7(2) of the Act, the phrase "in a contract" was given importance. Thus, to examine under Section 11, if arbitration agreement exists would depend on whether the contract "exists", and a contract cannot exist as a matter of law until the contract has been duly stamped.

The Supreme Court overruled the Bombay High Court's decision in Gautam Landscapes Private Ltd. and Ors v. Shailesh S. Shah and Ors with regards to deciding a Section 11 application for an unstamped arbitration agreement, and held that a High Court must mandatorily impound an unstamped or an insufficiently stamped arbitration agreement and send it to the adjudicating authority to decide the issues relating to stamp duty and penalty as expeditiously as possible.


1 (2011) 14 SCC 66

2 Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.

3 (2017) 4 SCC 498

4 2019 (2) ArbLR 413 (Bom)

5 2019 (6) SCALE 250

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions