India: Looking For The Authors Behind Works Created Autonomously By AI Machines

Authorship of creative works has been a highly debated topic for over 200 years. Till now, assigning authorship to a human was not that difficult as most of the new technologies assisting in creation of copyrightable works, like cameras and computers, were mere tools and humans were the actual brains behind the creation. However, with the recent rapid growth of AI systems and new learning methods, more and more works are being created by machines without any human interference. Copyright offices around the world are unprepared and are not able to acknowledge the importance of these new sources of creativity.

Denial of copyright has resulted in the AI created works to be released into the public domain. There is an urgent need to reinterpret the laws or create new ones to accommodate works created autonomously by nonhumans, as giving exclusive rights over the works would act as a major incentive for the AI developers. This article proposes to reinterpret the terms "employer" and "employee" for the purpose of work made for hire doctrine, rather than redefining the term "authorship" to include non-humans.

Most countries, including USA, UK, and the EU nations, have refused to grant copyright to anyone when there is no active human contribution to the creation of the work. In Naruto v. Slater1, one of the most recent cases to talk about the issues related to human and nonhuman authorship, the Ninth Circuit had to answer the question of animal authorship in photos. In this case, a monkey named Naruto had taken a picture of itself by using a photographer's camera. The court refused to attribute the ownership to the monkey and focused on the wording of the Copyright Act which speaks of a 'person' to be involved in the creative process, and for a work to be copyrightable, a human must be involved in the creative process.

What is the right question? The author is of the opinion that determining copyrightability of AI created works by questioning whether a computer can be called as the author of a work is the wrong place to start with. We should focus more on writings than authors and it is better to ask whether a computer can create a copyrightable work rather than asking if it can be an author. There have been many attempts with different approaches to formulate a method to give protection to works created autonomously by AI systems. Most of them either propose a new sui generis right or amending the copyright laws. Both of these methods require a substantial amount of change to the present legal regime, which is not desirable.

REINTERPRETATION OF WORK MADE FOR HIRE DOCTRINE TO CLASSIFY AI SYSTEMS AS EMPLOYEES

As the developers and the companies owning AI systems have no direct role to play in the creation of works by the AI, it is impossible under the current copyright regime to assign them the copyright. The "Work Made for Hire" (WMFH or WFH) doctrine presents a feasible option to achieve this. According to this doctrine, in case a work is made for hire, an employer must be considered as the author even if an employee had created the work.2 These guidelines can be extrapolated to the AI industry to issue authorship to the programmers or owners. The WFMH doctrine is an exception to the general rule which states that ownership of copyright rests with the person who actually created the work, and as a result it serves as a perfect template to regulate works created autonomously by AI machines. The Indian Copyright Act, 1957, names the employer as author3, as it acts as an incentive and gives them control over the commercial aspect of the creation. Apart from awarding the employer for the investment made by him, a major reason to credit him as the author, instead of the employees, is to establish accountability and responsibility over the actions of the creators. This reasoning would conceptually fit well with AI created works.

Section 17 statutorily recognizes the author of the work to be the first owner of the copyright. However, this provision is subject to certain exceptions. Section 17(a) and (b) talk about situations where the employer is the first owner of the copyright in works created by authors under his employment. Section 17(c) includes all the other types of works created by an author and which are not mentioned in either clause (a) or (b). Where a man employs another to do work for him under his control, so that he can direct the time when the work shall be done and the means to be adopted to bring about the end, and the method in which the work shall be arrived on, then the contract is contract of service. If, on the other hand, a man employs another to do certain work but leaves it to that other person to decide how that work shall be done and what step shall be taken to produce that desired effect, then it is a contract for service. In Beloff v. Pressdram4, it was held that the true test is whether the employee is part of business and his work is integral part of the business, or whether his work is not integrated into the business but is only accessory to it or the work is done by him in business on his own account. In the former case it is a contract of service and in the latter a contract for service.5 When an AI machine creates a work autonomously, it could be treated as work created under contract for service.

There are many questions left unanswered when it comes to implementing the WMFH model on AI created works. Are the works copyrightable to begin with? And if they are not copyrightable, can the employer possess the copyright through the WMFH doctrine? What happens when an AI machine goes beyond the purview of its "employment"? For analysing the Work Made for Hire doctrine, an AI created work should be treated differently than a work created by an employee for a software company. There are no human authors behind an AI created work, whereas in a traditional employeremployee relationship, the employees create the works as per their prior agreement with the employer. The employees create the work with the involvement of the employer.6 The reasoning provided for giving  copyright to employers is to justify the large costs entailed in nurturing talent and gradually creating a copyrightable work.

Implementing this doctrine under the current copyright regime is impossible without a new legislation or amendments to existing laws. Works created autonomously by an AI machine do not come under WMFH as the relationship between the programmer and the AI system is not exactly an employer-employee relationship in the agency sense. According to section 2(d)(vi), an author is someone who caused the computer-generated works to be created. If the courts decide to interpret it liberally or there is an amendment to the Act expanding the definition of author, then it would be possible to grant ownership of copyright in the works created autonomously by the AI machines to those who were responsible for the creation of the AI systems.

BENEFITS OF ADOPTING THE WORK MADE FOR HIRE MODEL

Although the WMFH model has its own potential disadvantages, most of these drawbacks can be fixed with a little help from the legislature and the judiciary. Among all the proposed approaches, the WMFH model provides policymakers the least amount of headache, as there is no need to completely overhaul the copyright laws or create a new type of rights for AI created works. This model only requires small amendments to current legislations and a more accommodating interpretation by the courts. It also changes our understanding of computers, as the current legal systems around the world treat computers as a tool and try to find the human behind the machine.

Although there is no intention of labelling them as persons, modern AI systems can act creatively and independently, and thus this model imposes the same rules that regulate works produced by employees. Another problem being solved by this model is that of accountability gap. As the AI machines are seen as employees or contractors, the owner, programmer, or the user is held accountable for any action taken by the AI. This way, the legal system would be able to have a tight control over creative AI systems, and the users of AI systems will try their best to avoid damages, counterfeiting and infringing upon 3rd parties' rights. By reinterpreting the employer-employee relationship for work for hire doctrine, the potential attribution of copyright to non-humans or machines can be avoided as legal (companies) or natural (programmers) persons are given the copyright for works created by an AI. This would help prevent works from being released into the public domain, which is the current position in many countries, including US, as per Naruto v Slater. It ensures that all AI created works have a human author, thus negating the need for a debate over human versus non-human authorship.

Many AI users choose not to file for a copyright, as the general assumption is that their application would be rejected. This results in the failure to reveal participation of AI machines in the creative process. However, in many cases they intentionally don't disclose any contribution made by the AI system, and not properly accrediting the rightful author is a fair ground for annulling a copyright claim.7 By transferring the copyright to a human employer, policymakers can ensure that works created autonomously by AI machines are documented properly and registered with full disclosure of any contribution made by the AI.

Footnotes

1 Naruto v Slater, No 16-15469 (9th Cir. 2018).

2 US Copyright Office, Circular 9: Works Made for Hire (Sep. 2012), <https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ09.pdf> accessed 13 February 2019.

3 Section 17, Indian Copyright Act, 1957.

4 Beloff v. Pressdram Ltd., [1973] 1 All E.R. 241 (Ch. D.)

5 http://www.legalserviceindia.com/articles/copy_owner.htm accessed on 13 February 2019

6 E Jordan and others, 'Employment Relations Research Series 123 Employment Regulation Part A: Employer Perceptions and the Impact of Employment Regulation Executive Summary' <http://www.bis.gov.uk/ a s s e t s / b i s c o r e / e m p l o y m e n t - m a t t e r s / docs/f/11-1308-flexible-effective-fair-labour-> accessed 13 February 2019.

7 17 USC § 411(a).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions