India: Delhi High Court Rules On The Issue Of Two Indian Parties Choosing A Foreign Seat For Arbitration And The Arbitrability Of The Issue Of Alter Ego

Last Updated: 28 November 2017
Article by Rajat Jariwal and Aakash Bajaj

Most Read Contributor in India, August 2019

On 14 November 2017, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court (Court), in the case of GMR Energy Limited v Doosan Power Systems India Private Limited and Ors.,1 decided the issue regarding two Indian parties choosing a foreign seat of arbitration and the arbitrability of the principle of alter ego or piercing of the corporate veil.

Factual Background

The case involved four parties; namely (a) Doosan Power Systems India Private Limited (Doosan); (b) GMR Chhattisgarh Energy Limited (GCEL); (c) GMR Infrastructure Limited (GIL); and GMR Energy Limited (GMR Energy). Dossan and GCEL were parties to various EPC agreements and Dossan, GCEL and GIL were parties to a corporate guarantee agreement while Doosan and GMR Energy had entered into two MoUs (collectively referred to as Agreements).

The EPC agreements and the corporate guarantee, contained arbitration clauses under which the arbitration proceedings were to be conducted in accordance with the rules of Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC Rules) and the place of arbitration was Singapore. The MOUs were also governed by the same agreements.

On 11 December 2016, Doosan sent a notice of arbitration under the Agreements to GIL, GMR Energy and GCEL, seeking enforcement of the liability of the three parties, jointly and severally towards Doosan. GMR Energy objected to the notice and sought its discharge as a party and termination of the reference against it by Doosan.

Since, the SIAC proceeded to appoint an arbitrator on behalf of GMR Energy without deciding its objections, the present suit was filed seeking a decree of permanent injunction, restraining Doosan from instituting or continuing or proceeding with the arbitration proceedings against GMR Energy before SIAC.

Main contentions of GMR Energy

  1. The Agreements prescribed that - (a) law governing the contract shall be the domestic law of India; (b) The arbitration proceedings shall be conducted in Singapore; (c) The arbitration proceedings shall be as per the SIAC Rules; and (d) All the parties being Indian, Part-I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) will apply;
  2. Since, the arbitration is between two Indian parties, it cannot be termed as an International Commercial Arbitration and the parties cannot contract out of the domestic law of India, including the Act;
  3. GMR Energy not being a signatory to any of the arbitration agreements, cannot be roped into the international arbitration by applying the doctrine of alter ego or being a guarantor in the absence of a written guarantee; and
  4. Doosan, in any event, cannot merely discharge its burden by establishing a prima facie case on the principle of alter ego.

Main contentions of Doosan

  1. Since, the parties agreed to arbitration under the SIAC Rules with the seat of arbitration being at Singapore, Part-II of the Act will apply;
  2. Even Indian parties can agree to choose a foreign seat. Reliance in this regard was placed on Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd. v ONGC Limited & Ors.2, Atlas Exports Industries v Kotak & Co.3 and Sasan Power Limited v North American Coal Corporation (India) (P) Ltd.4 ; and
  3. Arbitration against the alter ego by a signatory is a well-recognized principle in India as well as Singapore (which is the chosen seat of arbitration). Therefore, the Arbitral Tribunal is the appropriate forum to adjudicate the issue of alter ego and the Court should not proceed with the present suit to determine whether GMR Energy is liable to be proceeded with in the arbitration or not.

Decision of the court

Two Indian parties can choose a foreign seat for arbitration

The Court while relying on the decision of the Supreme Court in Yograj Infrastructure Limited v Ssangyong Engineering and Construction Co. Ltd.,5 held, that where the arbitration clause provides that the arbitration proceedings shall be in accordance with SIAC Rules, it means that Singapore shall be the seat of arbitration and the arbitration dispute will be governed by the Singapore International Arbitration Act.

The Court further held, that the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Sasan Power (Supra)6 has held that two India parties are free to arbitrate in a place outside India and an award rendered pursuant thereto, would be a foreign award falling under Part-II of the Act. The Court also placed reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sasan Power v North American Coal Corporation India, and held that the choice of foreign seat by Indian party is not in derogation of the laws in India.

The Court distinguished the judgment of the Apex Court in TDM Infrastructure Private Limited v UE Development India Private Limited, wherein it was observed that the arbitration between two Indian parties having Indian nationalities cannot be said to be an International Commercial Arbitration, on the ground that such observation was only made for the purpose of Section 11 of the Act and cannot be relied on for any other purposes.

The Court therefore relying on the Atlas Exports case, held, that in the present case parties have expressly agreed to be governed by SIAC Rules for arbitration, leading to the conclusion that the seat of arbitration is Singapore and Part-II of the Act will be applicable in this case and not Part-I of the Act.

GMR Energy despite being a non-signatory can be subjected to International Commercial Arbitration based on the principle of alter ego

The Court also held that Doosan is invoking the principle of alter ego against GMR Energy inter alia on the following basis:

  1. GMR Energy, GCEL and GIL have common directors, use same corporate signage and letterheads and there is no corporate formality maintained between the said companies;
  2. At the relevant time, GMR Energy was the 100% holding company of GCEL; and
  3. Under the MOUs entered into between Doosan, GMR Energy, GCEL, GMR Energy undertook to discharge the liability of GCEL towards Doosan and made part payment in discharge of GCEL's liability.

The Court commending on the above and the scope of lifting of the corporate veil held, that GMR Energy can be subjected to arbitration with GCEL and GIL.

Further, the Court while dealing with the aspect of arbitrability of the issue of alter ego, relied on the Supreme Court decisions in A. Ayyaswami (Supra)7 and National Insurance Company Limited v Boghara Polyfab (P) Limited,8 and held that the issue of alter ego will fall under the category of disputes which can be decided by the Courts as well as by the arbitral tribunal.

The Court also went on to hold, that there is a distinction between an arbitration by a Court and an arbitration without intervention of the courts. The present case fell under the latter and it would be sufficient for the Court to rely on the pleadings supported by affidavits of the parties, without undertaking a full-fledged trial. The Court concluded, by stating that it would be in the domain of the arbitral tribunal to decide the issue of alter ego.


The issue, whether two foreign parties can choose a foreign seat of arbitration or agree to be governed by laws of a country other than India, has always been a contentious one. The observation of the Supreme Court in the case of TDM Infrastructure had often been viewed as a red flag for two India parties agreeing to be governed by a foreign law or choosing a foreign seat of arbitration. This judgment, even though by a Single Judge, departs from that view and allows Indian parties to opt for a foreign seat. Additionally, this decision dispels the cloud of uncertainty created by the judgment of the Delhi High Court in Sudhir Gopi v Indira Gandhi International Open University,9 wherein the Court had held that the issue of lifting of corporate veil is beyond the jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal.


1CS(Comm) 447/2017.

2Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd. v ONGC Limited & Ors , (1998) 1 SCC 305 (India).

3Atlas Exports Industries vs. Kotak & Co., (1999) 7 SCC 61 (India).

4Sasan Power Limited vs. North American Coal Corporation Ltd., 2015 SCC Online MP 417 (India).

5Yograj Infrastructure Limited v Ssangyong Engineering and Construction Co. Ltd, (2011) 9 SCC 735 (India).

6Sasan, supra note 4.

7Ayyaswami, supra note 5.

8National Insurance Company Limited v Boghara Polyfab (P) Limited, (2009) 1 SCC 267 (India).

9Sudhir Gopi v Indira Gandhi International Open University, 2017 SCCOnline Del 306 (India).

The content of this document do not necessarily reflect the views/position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up please contact Khaitan & Co at

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Link Legal India Law Services
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Link Legal India Law Services
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions