France: When A Domain Name Is Dropped, You Need The Best Catcher In Your Team

Last Updated: 23 August 2019
Article by Jane Seager
  • Ogio International Inc, which owned the OGIO mark, sought the transfer of '' under the auDRP
  • The majority of the panel denied the complaint; among other things, it declined to _nd that there was an intention to prevent the complainant from registering the domain name after it was dropped
  • The dissenting panellist found that the respondent did not have rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that it was at least registered in bad faith

In a recent decision under the '.au' Dispute Resolution Policy (auDRP) before the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), a three-member panel has denied the transfer of a domain name that exactly matched the complainant's trademark because the complainant had failed to prove that the respondent did not have rights or legitimate interests, and registered or used the domain name in bad faith. However, one of the panel members dissented and would have ordered a transfer of the domain name at issue.


The complainant was Ogio International Inc, a US-based subsidiary of Callaway Golf Company founded in 1987. It designed and manufactured bags and backpacks and had over 10 registered trademarks in Australia, including the OGIO trademark, registered in 1997 and 2004. According to the complaint, sales of the complainant's Ogio products to Australia over the last three years were in excess of A$1 million.

The respondent was Ogio Pty Ltd, an Australian company held by Mr Robert Kaay, owner of several other companies known to be domain name brokers and resellers.

The domain name '' was registered in January 2019. However, it was originally registered a number of years before by a party connected to the complainant, but not used and allowed to lapse sometime between 2016 and 2018. It was then picked up by one of Mr Kaay's companies and used to point to a website purporting to be about "Oil Gas Industry Organisation" and offered for sale via that website.

An inquiry was made by the complainant to 􀂦nd out if the domain name was for sale, to which Mr Kaay replied that it might be possible, depending on the amount the complainant was willing to pay. The complainant then wrote to auDA asking for the domain name to be cancelled because it was in breach of the Eligibility Rules for '.au', and also wrote to the respondent asserting that it would be able to recover the domain name pursuant to a complaint under the auDRP, but added that it would pay A$1,500 to swiftly resolve the matter. Mr Kaay agreed, but then refused to sign the transfer agreement acknowledging the complainant's rights and undertaking not to infringe them in future as he considered this offensive, and so the deal was cancelled.

However, as a result of the complainant's email, the auDA Compliance Team ordered the domain name to be cancelled due to a breach of the Eligibility Rules, but Mr Kaay succeeded in temporarily stopping this on the basis that he was using a "generic acronym" in compliance with auDA policy. However, auDA then backtracked and decided that the domain name would be deleted. Mr Kaay then incorporated the respondent, and the respondent successfully registered the domain name when it dropped. The complainant then made another purchase attempt, but this was rejected by the respondent and so the complainant 􀂦led a complaint under the auDRP

To be successful in a complaint under the auDRP, a complainant must satisfy the following three requirements:

  1. the disputed domain name is identical, or confusingly similar, to a name, trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights;
  2. the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
  3. the domain name has been registered or subsequently used in bad faith.


As far as the 􀂦rst limb was concerned, the complainant submitted that the domain name was identical to its trademark OGIO. Disregarding the '', the domain name was deemed identical to the complainant's trademark. Thus, the complainant satis􀂦ed the 􀂦rst element of Paragraph 4(a).

As far as the second requirement of the auDRP was concerned, the complainant presented a three-part case:

  • Mr Kaay's profession (domain name broker) should be taken into account;
  • The previous domain name registration was the same as the current one and that there had therefore been a contract between the complainant and Mr Kaay; and
  • Mr Kaay had registered the previous domain name for monetisation, but did not comply with the auDA requirements, hence why the complainant's eligibility complaint had been successful (auDA had found that Mr Kaay's business name "Organic IT services" (purportedly the abbreviation of Ogio) had not been registered before the registration of the domain name).

The main thrust of the complainant's assertions was that the respondent was arti􀂦cially set up in an attempt to legitimise Mr Kaay's previous unsuccessful holding of the domain name.

The majority of the panel rejected all three parts of the complainant's case and found that the arguments raised by the complainant only revolved around the previous domain name registration and its previous holder. It found that Mr Kaays' position as a domainer should not be taken into consideration as long as it was established that it was a lawful and legitimate activity. Concerning the contract, the majority argued that it had never been signed and had been rejected by Mr Kaay. The enforcement of the contract could be considered only if there was an actual lawsuit, but that was not within the scope of the panel's decision. In respect of the last part of the case, the majority pointed out that the domain name was available for purchase again on a "􀂦rst-come, 􀂦rst-served" basis, and that the complainant could not have ignored that there was a risk that the respondent might succeed in registering the domain name.

Turning to the third limb and bad faith, the complainant argued that the respondent had registered the domain name to sell or rent to the complainant, and to prevent the owner of a trademark or name from re􀂧ecting that mark in a corresponding domain name, which corresponded to Paragraphs 4(b)(i) and 4(b)(ii) of the auDRP.

The panel refused to recognise a breach of Paragraphs 4(b)(i) and (ii). According to the majority, the respondent did not initiate any approach to the complainant, but merely mentioned that it would consider selling the domain name for the current market value, which did not constitute an offer but only an invitation to treat. The majority also declined to 􀂦nd that there was an intention to prevent the complainant from trying to register the domain name after it was dropped, and that it was successfully registered by the respondent on a "􀂦rst-come, 􀂦rst-served" basis. There was nothing to show that the respondent's principal motivation was to prevent the complainant from using the trademark.

As a result of the majority of the panel's 􀂦ndings, the case was denied.

Dissenting opinion

However, the dissenting member of the panel profoundly disagreed and found that the respondent did not have rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, and that it was at least registered in bad faith.

Regarding the respondent's rights or legitimate interests, in the dissenting panellist's view there was no evidence that the disputed domain name was used in connection with a good-faith offering of goods or services or some form of non-commercial or fair use. The dissenting panel member also found that the complainant's trademark had been registered for a number of years before the disputed domain name and that this was typically su􀂨cient to prove that the respondent did not have rights or legitimate interests in the domain name. The company name of the respondent was registered, but this was not su􀂨cient to prove legitimate interests or rights in itself and had to be justi􀂦ed by use in good faith. In the dissenting panellist's opinion, the only evidence of use of the domain name was the invitation to treat posted on the website, which led to the conclusion that the domain name was registered only with the intention of selling or renting it for a price exceeding the documented cost.

The dissenting panellist also pointed out that, unlike the UDRP, the auDRP considered that the use of a domain name was not bona 􀂦de when the website did not resolve to any subject matter in relation to the domain name and when the domain name was related to an entity name, personal name or brand already in existence at the time that the domain name was registered. The website only mentioned that it was under construction and that the domain name was available for lease or sale, but the trademark OGIO was already in existence at the time.

The last point raised in the dissenting opinion was that the "􀂦rst-come, 􀂦rst-served" basis applies only to claimants with competing rights, but the dissenting panellist refused to 􀂦nd that the respondent had such rights. He also found that the disputed domain name was registered in bad faith as the respondent had clear knowledge of the complainant's trademark given the circumstances.


This decision is an important reminder of how panels can have different approaches to the same facts in complex cases and that the selection of a three-member panel may in fact only serve to make matters more complicated. It also underlines how, while it may seem easier to complain to a registry that a registrant does not meet the eligibility criteria for a particular extension, such complaints usually never result in transfer if successful, only cancellation - and cancellation always carries a signi􀂦cant risk that a third party will pick up the domain name at issue, or even the previous registrant, as was the case here. Even though a complaint under the relevant dispute resolution policy may seem more time consuming and expensive, it is the only way to obtain a transfer order.

Originally published by World Trademark Review

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions