Mondaq USA: Employment and HR > Employment Litigation/ Tribunals
Fisher Phillips LLP
The Kentucky Court of Appeals just held that non-lawyers may no longer represent employers in unemployment proceedings, ruling that such a practice is unconstitutional.
Mintz
Our colleague Gil Samberg offers analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela, which held that neither silence nor ambiguity in an arbitration agreement
Fisher Phillips LLP
For the past several years, there has been a steep increase in litigation in the hospitality industry brought under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and now a new twist is on the rise.
Fisher Phillips LLP
There's no way to sugarcoat this one. Today the 9th Circuit handed a big loss to gig economy companies by concluding that last year's Dynamex decision from the California Supreme Court
Stites & Harbison PLLC
In 1984, the Kentucky Legislature enacted KRS 341.407(3), permitting employers, including corporations and partnerships, to represent themselves or be represented by counsel in administrative
Dentons
On April 24, 2019, the US Supreme Court ruled on the question of whether the Federal Arbitration Act (the "FAA") "bars an order requiring
BakerHostetler
Sometimes being right is not a virtue, especially when it comes to the Federal Arbitration Act § 1 exemption. We predicted uncertainty after the New Prime v. Oliveira decision and got it.
Fisher Phillips LLP
A federal court announced today that employers have until September 30, 2019 to turn over pay data as part of your revised EEO-1 reporting obligations.
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
As we previously reported here, on April 3, 2019, the White House Office of Management and Budget ("OMB")
Littler Mendelson
On April 25, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ordered the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to collect detailed data.
Ford & Harrison LLP
Executive Summary: Approximately one year ago, in Epic Systems Corp., the United States Supreme Court upheld the enforceability of mandatory arbitration agreements that prohibit employees from
Holland & Knight
The U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in Lamps Plus, Inc., et al. v. Varela, No. 17-988, on April 24, 2019.
Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
In a surprise opinion issued April 26, the Kentucky Court of Appeals held unconstitutional the Kentucky statute permitting non-lawyers to represent employers in unemployment compensation proceedings.
Fisher Phillips LLP
Is arbitration even worth it anymore? In the recent past, most employers would have said "yes" without a second thought.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Who sits as Chair of the EEOC unquestionably has a significant impact for all employers interacting with the Commission.
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
Under the policy, the claimant was required to provide satisfactory proof of his disability on an ongoing basis.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Synopsis: Today the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in the Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela class action arbitration case.
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court slammed the door shut on class arbitration unless specifically authorized by the parties.
Reed Smith
On March 29, 2019, a California Court of Appeal held that a trial court did not retain jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 to enforce a settlement agreement after dismissal of the underlying lawsuit because the parties did not comply with the strict requirements of section 664.6.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Synopsis: A federal district court in Arkansas recently denied an employer's motion for summary judgment on two EEOC-initiated ADA claims – in EEOC v. Crain Automotive Holdings LLC,
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
We recently highlighted DOL opinion letter 2018-27, which rescinded the 80/20 rule and was a welcome change for employers in the restaurant industry.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Synopsis: Today the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in the Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela class action arbitration case.
Davis & Gilbert
On March 14, 2019, a federal court in Pennsylvania issued a noteworthy decision that should remind employers to ask if an employee's unexplained absences may be due to medical reasons.
Dentons
On April 24, 2019, the US Supreme Court ruled on the question of whether the Federal Arbitration Act (the "FAA") "bars an order requiring
Littler Mendelson
On April 15, 2019, a California Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment for the employer in an action alleging class-wide violations of the hyper-technical provisions of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Synopsis: A federal district court in Arkansas recently denied an employer's motion for summary judgment on two EEOC-initiated ADA claims – in EEOC v. Crain Automotive Holdings LLC,
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
Under the policy, the claimant was required to provide satisfactory proof of his disability on an ongoing basis.
Ford & Harrison LLP
Executive Summary: Approximately one year ago, in Epic Systems Corp., the United States Supreme Court upheld the enforceability of mandatory arbitration agreements that prohibit employees from
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Each year, the California Chamber of Commerce ("Chamber") identifies proposed state legislation that the Chamber believes "will decimate economic and job growth in California."
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
As it currently stands, the federal circuits are split on these issues.
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with