Mondaq Canada: Anti-trust/Competition Law > Antitrust, EU Competition
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg
Canada's Competition Bureau is actively seeking and reviewing smaller acquisitions that may not exceed pre-merger notification thresholds under the Competition Act but that may nonetheless raise substantive competition issues.
Goodmans LLP
In an expansion of section 36 of the Competition Act, an eight member majority of the Supreme Court has ruled that "umbrella purchasers" can be class members in price-fixing class actions.
McMillan LLP
These appeals raise a fundamental question: are courts at a stage where the balance struck by Parliament of Canada's competition law
Torys LLP
On September 20, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its long-awaited decision in an important competition class action. Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey (Godfrey)
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Transactions involving traditional manufacturing and services companies have received inquiries in addition to those in the digital sector.
Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
This is not to say that umbrella purchasers' actions will not be complex or otherwise difficult to pursue.
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg
The Supreme Court of Canada has released its long-awaited decision in two companion appeals that have significant implications for class actions alleging conduct that contravenes the criminal provisions found in Part VI of the Competition Act.
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
On September 20, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) clarified several procedural questions regarding class-action certification in the case of Pioneer v. Godfrey.
Fasken
On September 12, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada denied Sobeys Incorporated's ("Sobeys") and Metro Incorporated's ("Metro")
Stikeman Elliott LLP
In a news release on September 17, 2019, the Competition Bureau reiterated that its new "Merger Intelligence and Notification Unit" will play an expanded role.
Stikeman Elliott LLP
The Supreme Court of Canada extends the right to sue under section 36 of the Competition Act to umbrella purchasers who bought products from manufacturers not alleged to have been involved in any price fixing conspiracy.
Dentons
In Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey, 2019 SCC 42, an 8-1 majority of the Supreme Court of Canada determined that the discoverability rule applies to the limitation period in s.
Stikeman Elliott LLP
La Cour suprême du Canada étend le droit d'intenter une poursuite en vertu de l'article 36 de la Loi sur la concurrence aux acheteurs sous parapluie qui ont acheté des produits de fabricants qui
Stikeman Elliott LLP
Dans son communiqué du 17 septembre 2019, le Bureau de la concurrence réitère le rôle élargi que jouera sa nouvelle « Unité du renseignement et des avis de fusion
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Today, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark competition class action decision in Toshiba Corporation, et al v Neil Godfrey and Pioneer Corporation, et al v Neil Godfrey.
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released the highly-anticipated decision in Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey, addressing a number of issues
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
In a landmark decision that was released this morning, the Supreme Court has revisited and reset the ground rules governing the availability of collective relief for consumers in Canada
Lenczner Slaght LLP
On September 20, 2019, the Supreme Court released its long-awaited decision in Pioneer Corp v Godfrey.
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
The Canadian Competition Bureau (Bureau) issued two announcements in September 2019 that impact companies doing business in Canada.
Siskinds LLP
On September 20, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a decision in Godfrey v Sony Corp., a class action related to alleged price-fixing in the market for optical disc drives ("ODDs").
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Blaney McMurtry LLP
In Hughes v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario, the Court affirmed a motion judge's dismissal of a proposed class action against the LCBO stemming from an agreement between the LCBO and Brewer's
Stikeman Elliott LLP
Dans son communiqué du 17 septembre 2019, le Bureau de la concurrence réitère le rôle élargi que jouera sa nouvelle « Unité du renseignement et des avis de fusion
Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
This is not to say that umbrella purchasers' actions will not be complex or otherwise difficult to pursue.
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Transactions involving traditional manufacturing and services companies have received inquiries in addition to those in the digital sector.
Dentons
Like regulatory agencies everywhere, Canada's Competition Bureau (the "Bureau") is grappling with the fast-changing digital economy and its implications for competition and innovation.
Torys LLP
On September 20, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its long-awaited decision in an important competition class action. Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey (Godfrey)
Dentons
In Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey, 2019 SCC 42, an 8-1 majority of the Supreme Court of Canada determined that the discoverability rule applies to the limitation period in s.
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Today, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark competition class action decision in Toshiba Corporation, et al v Neil Godfrey and Pioneer Corporation, et al v Neil Godfrey.
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg
The Supreme Court of Canada has released its long-awaited decision in two companion appeals that have significant implications for class actions alleging conduct that contravenes the criminal provisions found in Part VI of the Competition Act.
Gowling WLG
In connection with the agreement, Party City and Canadian Tire have also agreed to a long-term wholesale supply agreement, with an initial term of 10 years.
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with