Mondaq USA: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration > Libel & Defamation
Reed Smith
Addressing an issue of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled last week that a venue analysis dating to 1967 focusing on the location of dissemination of allegedly defamatory
Withers LLP
"What do you mean?" We pose this question to our friends and colleagues on a regular basis. After all, the nuances of the English language, individual turns of phrase and geographical idioms
Morrison & Foerster LLP
On May 6, 2019, the California Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc. that could carry big implications for California's much-litigated anti-SLAPP law.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
On several occasions in 2017, the company disciplined Charging Party 2 for being unkempt and not wearing the proper uniform.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
On March 8, 2019, New York State Supreme Court Justice Joel M. Cohen dismissed a defamation action brought by Eros International plc, an Indian media company,
Littler Mendelson
Ontario employers can speak candidly about former employees' weaknesses when providing job references, as long as the dominant motive for the reference is not malicious
Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
Copyright by, and republished with permission of, Habitat Magazine.
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander? Not necessarily. The Ninth Circuit and California Court of Appeals recently decided two cases that substantially limit the scope and application
Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
New Yorkers own hundreds of thousands of cats, dogs, farm animals and other pets.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Synopsis: The U.S. Virgin Islands and Westchester County, New York have enacted legislation which brings these jurisdictions into the growing "Ban the Box" trend.
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
When a business gets sued it looks to its various insurance policies for coverage and a defense.
McLane Middleton, Professional Association
In just one click, they can hand out the dreaded one-star review without any evidence to support the rating.
Proskauer Rose LLP
In what is one of the most recent attempts to circumvent the immunity provided in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act ("CDA" or "CDA Section 230")
Bowditch & Dewey
Darrell Peoples ("Peoples"), an African-American former "grounds person and heavy equipment operator" at Wichita State University ("WSU"), sued WSU and a female coworker,
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
In the wake of the #MeToo movement, many state legislatures have begun to take action to provide greater protections for victims of sexual harassment and make it easier for them
Thompson Coburn LLP
The Internet has clearly changed how we think about facts and truth, as the Stormy Daniels versus President Donald Trump case illustrates
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
A Rhode Island court recently dismissed claims against a consumer products blogger.
Morrison & Foerster LLP
As we have noted previously, the California Court of Appeal's Hassell v. Bird decision in 2016 upholding an injunction requiring Yelp to remove certain user reviews was discouraging to social media companies and other online intermediaries, as well as to fans of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and proponents of Internet free speech generally.
Bowditch & Dewey
One state has addressed this issue through new legislation.
Proskauer Rose LLP
In a closely-followed dispute, the California Supreme Court vacated a lower court order, based upon a default judgment in a defamation action, which had directed Yelp, Inc. ("Yelp")...
Most Popular Recent Articles
Morrison & Foerster LLP
On May 6, 2019, the California Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc. that could carry big implications for California's much-litigated anti-SLAPP law.
Reed Smith
Addressing an issue of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled last week that a venue analysis dating to 1967 focusing on the location of dissemination of allegedly defamatory
Withers LLP
"What do you mean?" We pose this question to our friends and colleagues on a regular basis. After all, the nuances of the English language, individual turns of phrase and geographical idioms
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander? Not necessarily. The Ninth Circuit and California Court of Appeals recently decided two cases that substantially limit the scope and application
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
On March 8, 2019, New York State Supreme Court Justice Joel M. Cohen dismissed a defamation action brought by Eros International plc, an Indian media company,
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Synopsis: The U.S. Virgin Islands and Westchester County, New York have enacted legislation which brings these jurisdictions into the growing "Ban the Box" trend.
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
A Rhode Island court recently dismissed claims against a consumer products blogger.
Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
New Yorkers own hundreds of thousands of cats, dogs, farm animals and other pets.
Littler Mendelson
Ontario employers can speak candidly about former employees' weaknesses when providing job references, as long as the dominant motive for the reference is not malicious
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with