Mondaq USA: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration > Trials & Appeals & Compensation
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In a meaty decision involving the intersection of restrictive covenant and franchise law, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio recently denied a request ...
RPX Corporation
Computer Protection IP, LLC (CPIP) has filed its first affirmative lawsuit, accusing New Dream Network (DreamHost) (2:17-cv-08858) of infringing a single server security patent.
RPX Corporation
A patent infringement suit brought against Google by Personal Audio, LLC has been transferred from the Eastern District of Texas (1:15-cv-00350) to the District of Delaware (1:17-cv-01751) due to improper venue.
RPX Corporation
F2VS Technologies, Inc. has added two cases to the campaign that it began this past June, suing Acuity Brands (Acuity Brands Lighting) (1:17-cv-04774) and Daintree Networks (1:17-cv-01713).
Carlton Fields
In Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co. v. VisionAid, Inc., No. 15-1351P2-01A (1st Cir. Nov. 15, 2017), the First Circuit Court of Appeals ended long-running insurance coverage litigation arising from policyholder ...
BakerHostetler
This was the ambitious slate of illnesses and symptoms that Health Research Laboratories (HRL) and Kramer Duhon, its owner and president, claimed to cure.
Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals recently reinforced a Circuit split on what kind of settlement agreement allows a claimant to pursue a contribution claim against other PRPs ...
S.S. Rana & Co. Advocates
Finally, the seething and slithering epic IP battle in the United States related to the ownership of the trademark ‘Comic-Con' has come to an end with San Diego Comic Con emerging victorious.
Sedgwick LLP
Last week, we began reviewing the trial courts from which the state Supreme Court's civil and criminal dockets arise year by year, both here and over on our sister blog the Illinois Supreme Court Review.
Proskauer Rose LLP
Although it may be cold comfort to BWH, the Court also upheld the validity of the patent, affirming the jury's finding of no anticipation or obviousness.
Reed Smith
Friday December 8 was a day with two items that are particularly noteworthy because of their potentially momentous implications.
Sedgwick LLP
Yesterday, we reviewed which trial courts produced the Court's civil docket, year by year for the period 1995 through 1999. Today, we'll review the criminal docket for the same years.
Butler Snow LLP
When the law addresses medical judgment directly, it allows room for reasonable physician choice. It is ironic then, that a product liability suit over design defect may not allow any such room.
McLane Middleton, Professional Association
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, in the case of Ajemian v. Yahoo!, Inc., held that the Stored Communications Act (SCA)...
Mayer Brown
When it comes to punitive damages doctrine, the decision is a mixed bag.
Jones Day
The Commission has determined to review an initial determination finding that Respondent Ford is estopped under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) from asserting certain invalidity defences...
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
On Monday, November 27, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in SAS Institute v. Matal.
Sedgwick LLP
Last week, we began reviewing the trial courts from which the Court's civil and criminal dockets have arisen, beginning with the years 1990 through 1994.
Much Shelist, P.C.
In Kindred Nursing Centers v. Clark, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a wrongful-death action brought by two deceased residents' relatives...
Ropes & Gray LLP
As I have pointed out previously, the Board struggles to issue precedential decisions. This is because the Board (now approaching 300 judges) must reach a "sufficient majority" consensus...
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Ropes & Gray LLP
Scott McKeown, Ropes & Gray IP litigation partner and chair of the firm's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) group, discusses potential impacts of pending Supreme Court PTAB cases...
Troutman Sanders LLP
On September 20, 2017, a group of construction union trusts that operate in the New York City metropolitan area successfully obtained a $76 million award from a midtown construction firm...
Stites & Harbison PLLC
What is a Court to do when an attorney knowingly violates the automatic stay in bankruptcy, and after being sanctioned for that transgression, challenges an award of attorney's fees at every possible opportunity?
Jones Day
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("Federal Circuit") considered the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act ("BPCAI") once again on November 13, 2017.
Troutman Sanders LLP
In the cross-appeals of a $246,975,614 judgment won by New York State and New York City, amici curiae have filed briefs in support of the United Parcel Service, Inc., ("UPS").
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
The Ninth and Second Circuits applied Chevron deference to the SEC's interpretive rule that individuals are not required to report to the SEC to be entitled to Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation protections.
Jones Day
Defendants in False Claims Act ("FCA") suits have long argued they should not be liable if they can show that the government paid their claims despite being aware of the alleged falsehood.
Carlton Fields
These agreements are allowed and enforceable under Florida law.
RPX Corporation
Computer Protection IP, LLC (CPIP) has filed its first affirmative lawsuit, accusing New Dream Network (DreamHost) (2:17-cv-08858) of infringing a single server security patent.
Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A.
In GEICO v. Harvey, (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 4, 2017), Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal held that the trial court erred in denying the insurer's motion for directed verdict on the insured's bad faith claim.
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with