Mondaq USA: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration > Trials & Appeals & Compensation
Haug Partners
On June 12, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a finding of indefiniteness that invalidated two patents claiming wireless audio systems in One-E-Way, Inc. v. ITC.
Reed Smith
We were recently asked the question, "are failure to contraindicate claims preempted?"
Reed Smith
It's a fairly well known double standard. If you ask your child why he or she did that rotten, terrible, awful thing and he or she responds "just because" – that's never good enough.
Reed Smith
Earlier this week, a unanimous but fractured Supreme Court ruled that a controversial provision in the Lanham Act prohibiting the registration of trademarks that disparage ...
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
In a greatly-anticipated decision, the Supreme Court ruled today that the U.S. government cannot refuse federal registration of an offensive trademark, holding that such a restriction violates the First Amendment.
Jones Day
The United States Supreme Court has issued an important decision rejecting California's effort to assert personal jurisdiction over nonresident corporations and curtailing the plaintiff's bar's efforts at forum shopping.
Reed Smith
The Supreme Court decided "the big one" today – and not to keep anyone in suspense [the big one is a major earthquake in California mass tort litigation]...
Reed Smith
A class action lawsuit against the developer of Candy Crush will continue in Illinois federal court.
Jones Day
By rule, a petitioner may request permission from the Board to submit supplemental information in an IPR proceeding if:
Carlton Fields
This Week's Florida Appeals: Week of June 12 - 16, 2017
Reed Smith
Last week we bashed a Ninth Circuit Daubert decision. We feel a little bit bad about that, because we hate contributing to the chorus of defense hacks who bemoan the Ninth Circuit's supposedly liberal, pro-plaintiff bias.
Womble Carlyle
The high court held that the federal government cannot deny a trademark registration because some people might find the trademark offensive.
Carlton Fields
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia granted summary judgment in favor of AIG Specialty Insurance Co. in a case involving the application of the firearms exclusion in Powe v. Chartis Specialty Insurance Co.
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC to examine the constitutionality of inter partes review proceedings by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Orrick
We have discussed before the importance of maintaining internal policies and procedures to protect the security and integrity of cloud-based repositories.
Reed Smith
Earlier this week, we posted on the Ninth Circuit's conversion of the Daubert's gate (that the trial court should keep) into more of a swinging saloon door.
Carlton Fields
Businesses and other organizations fail from time to time. That is a reality of our capitalist system.
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
On January 27, 2017, President Trump issued Executive Order 13769, entitled "Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States," (EO1), which went into effect immediately.
Mayer Brown
Today, the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.
Proskauer Rose LLP
The Amsterdam Court of Appeal denied approval of the €1.204 billion collective settlement of former Fortis (now Ageas) shareholders' claims unless the parties agree to restructure the allocation of the settlement amount ...
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Jones Day
In a highly anticipated decision—HPIP Gonzales Holdings, LLC v. Sabine Oil & Gas Corp—Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York affirmed 2016...
Schwartz Law
If you lose and the insurance company has a claim against you, it may get the benefits it paid you back from you.
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
This alert examines the Supreme Court's Impression Products decision, which expands the doctrine of patent exhaustion to sales outside the U.S. and confirms that the doctrine cannot be limited...
Reed Smith
For those of us who spend large chunks of our professional lives in mass tort MDLs, expressions like "settlement inventory" are ubiquitous
Mayer Brown
We've previously blogged about Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court ("BMS"), in which the Supreme Court granted certiorari to review a decision of the California Supreme Court that adopted an unusual ...
Moritt, Hock & Hamroff LLP
One generally does not think of municipalities, who are often sued under the Federal Fair Housing Act (FHA), as being plaintiffs in actions under that statute.
Andrews Kurth LLP
On May 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in SAS Institute, Inc. v. Lee...
BakerHostetler
In Rivera v. International Trade Commission, Appeal No. 2016-1841 (Fed. Cir. May 23, 2017), the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC's decision invalidating Rivera's patent under the written description...
Jones Day
On May 30, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court held that when a patent owner sells a product covered by a patent, that sale—whether it takes place in the United States or outside the country—"exhausts its patent rights, regardless of any post-sale restrictions the patentee purports to impose, either directly or through a license."
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Below, a divided Federal Circuit panel held that: (1) a biosimilar applicant is not required to provide its application and manufacturing information to the Reference Product Sponsor (RPS)
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with