Current filters:  
USA
United States
Nossaman LLP
In surprising news for the California county retirement system community, on April 17, 2024, the California Supreme Court granted review of Ventura County Employees' Retirement Ass'n v. Criminal Justice Attorney's Ass'n of Ventura County (2024) 98 Cal.App.5th 1119 (the VCERA decision).
Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
In a long-awaited action, on April 19, 2024, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated the two most studied per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)...
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Earlier this month, the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association (ABA) convened for its 72nd Spring Meeting, which is the largest annual gathering of antitrust professionals...
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
On April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision that could increase plaintiffs' abilities to bring discrimination claims...
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
The final regulations amend § 34 C.F.R. 106.1, et seq. According to a statement from the Department announcing the final rule, "The unofficial version of the final regulations is available here.
Venable LLP
Join us as we spotlight select chapters of Venable's popular Advertising Law Tool Kit, which helps marketing teams navigate their organization's legal risk.
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
With the arrival of the unofficial annual holiday known as "4/20," employers can celebrate by reminding themselves of the state laws that could protect employees' off-duty 4/20 celebrations.
Goulston & Storrs
In Griffin v. Melrose MA Plan. Bd., pro se plaintiff David Griffin ("Griffin") appealed a decision of the Melrose Board of Appeals (the "Board") granting a special permit to Middlesex Development...
Goulston & Storrs
The case of Porter v. Bd. of Appeal of Boston is the latest case that involves an eternal question posed by developers: how does a developer whose development permits are challenged...
Foley & Lardner
On March 13, 2024, Governor Spencer Cox signed House Bill (H.B.) 55 into law, making Utah the latest state to restrict the use of certain nondisclosure and non-disparagement agreements relating to sexual assault or sexual harassment claims.
Nossaman LLP
On April 19, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its final rule designating perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), two of the most common...
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
The debate over student-athletes' employment status has once again returned to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), this time drawing the University of Notre Dame into the dispute.
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
The recent ANA Advertising Law 1-Day Conference, hosted in Katten's New York office, included a panel about current legal trends in sports marketing featuring Sports and Sports Facilities Partner...
Mintz
In Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Mo., the U.S. Supreme Court made it easier for employees who are involuntarily transferred to a lateral position to pursue discrimination claims, even when they retain...
Jones Day
The Court's decision in Muldrow v. St. Louis requires plaintiffs to prove "some injury" respecting employment terms or conditions in discrimination cases.
Foley & Lardner
In its November 2023 Proposed Rule and in its recently issued Final Rule that was published in the Federal Register on April 23, 2024, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)...
Arnold & Porter
On April 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury, in its role as Chair of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS or the Committee), announced a Notice of Proposed...
Jenner & Block
As we kick off Earth Day 2024, we look to this year's Earth Day theme–"Planet versus Plastics." Planet versus Plastics seeks to focus attention on the challenges...
Jones Day
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") announces the finalization of a rule designating PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous substances.
Mintz
Recently, the New York Attorney General filed a lawsuit against the American subsidiaries of JBS Group, the Brazilian-based beef producer, asserting that JBS had "violat[ed] New York's consumer protection statutes" through its "fraudulent and illegal environmental marketing practices."
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Popular Contributors
Upcoming Events
Mondaq Social Media