Contributor Page
Haug Partners
 
Email  |  Website  |  Articles
Contact Details
Tel: +1 212 588 0800
Fax: +1 212 588 0500
745 Fifth Avenue, 10th Floor
New York
NY 10151
United States
By Joseph Saphia, Bonnie Gaudette
On October 9, 2018, the Federal Circuit added to its growing collection of favorable Alice step one rulings by reversing portions of a decision from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware...
By Haug Partners
Following an August 6, 2018 oral argument, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on September 6, 2018 unanimously affirmed the District of New Jersey's August 15, 2017 ruling ...
By Jon Gordon
Can you patent your blockchain?
By Edgar Haug, Sandra Kuzmich, John Dougherty, Nicholas Giove, Tiffany Jang, Jonathan Herstoff
The U.S. District Court of Massachusetts has new patent rules effective June 1, 2018. Newly amended Local Rule 16.6 applies to all newly filed patent cases and to any patent case where a scheduling order has not been entered.
By David Zwally
The PTAB agreed with Broad and terminated the interference. UC appealed.
By Benjamin Dach
The concept of "privilege" is critically important in the United States legal system and litigation.
By Amanda Hamilton
Antitrust Associate Amanda Hamilton published an article in FDLI's Update Magazine for the January-February 2018 Issue entitled "Navigating an FTC Drug Pricing Investigation
By Joseph Saphia, Bonnie Gaudette
On February 8, 2018, the Federal Circuit vacated portions of a decision from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Berkheimer v. HP Inc., No. 2017-1437, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 3040.
By Jonathan Herstoff
Haug Partners LLP Attorney Jonathan Herstoff recently argued before the United States Supreme Court for Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago et al., No. 16-658 (U.S.), and won in a unanimous vote.
By Brian Murphy, Richard Kurz, Jonathan Herstoff
On November 27, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in SAS Institute Inc. v. Matal, No. 16-969. At issue is whether in inter partes reviews ("IPRs") ...
By Brian Murphy, Richard Kurz, Jonathan Herstoff
On November 27, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Oil States Energy Services v. Greene's Energy Group, No. 16-712. At issue is whether inter partes reviews ("IPRs") are unconstitutional ...
By Sandra Kuzmich, Rebecca Hilgar, Laura Sarkis
Over the past few months the venue landscape for patent infringement litigations has changed drastically.
By Richard Kurz, Mark Basanta
On October 4, 2017, the Federal Circuit issued its en banc decision in Aqua Products, Inc., v. Matal, holding that the patent owner does not have the burden to prove the patentability of any substitute claim...
By Ben Natter, Jessica L. Sblendorio
Most commentators would likely conclude that tattoos are eligible for copyright protection under the Copyright Act.
By Amanda Hamilton
Amanda Hamilton recently had her article "What Can the FTC Do about Orphan Drug Prices?" published in the Antitrust Health Care Chronicle for August 2017.