Contributor Page
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
 
Email  |  Website  |  Articles
Contact Details
Tel: +1 617 646 8000
Fax: +1 617 646 8646
600 Atlantic Avenue
Boston
MA 02210
United States
By John L. Welch
In a nonprecedential ruling, the CAFC has affirmed the Board's decision finding Louis Vuitton Malletier's mark APOGÉE for perfume confusable with the registered mark APHOGEE for hair care preparations.
By John L. Welch
The Board sustained an opposition to registration of HOLLYWOOD HOTEL for hotel and bar services, finding that the applicant was not the owner of the mark at the time it filed its application to register.
By John L. Welch
[This guest post was written by Kira-Khanh McCarthy, a rising-3L at University of Notre Dame Law School.]
By John L. Welch
In case you haven't heard, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Section 2(a)'s "immoral or scandalous" bar to trademark registration "infringes the First Amendment" and is therefore
By John L. Welch
The USPTO refused registration of the mark MAIN LINE REFRESH (standard characters) for "Medical consultations; Medical services; Cosmetic and plastic surgery" [MAIN LINE disclaimed], ...
By John L. Welch
[This guest post was written by Kira-Khanh McCarthy, a rising-3L at University of Notre Dame Law School.]
By John L. Welch
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark THE CARDIO GROUP & Design for "retail store services featuring medical devices
By John L. Welch
The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below.
By John L. Welch
The Board reversed a Section 2(e)(5) refusal to register the package configuration mark shown below, for "canned fish; tinned fish."
By John L. Welch
In this long-running cancellation proceeding aimed at a registration for the mark COHIBA for cigars, the Board considered.
By John L. Welch
In one of the more interesting cases in recent memory, the Board rendered a split decision regarding registrability of the "design" shown immediately below, for snow groomers
By John L. Welch
In an enervating 22-page opinion, the Board rendered a split decision in this appeal from a genericness refusal of the service mark HEALTHPLANS.COM
By Amanda B. Slade, John L. Strand
The U.S. Supreme Court's June 24 decision in Iancu v. Brunetti provides a green light for immoral or scandalous marks to receive federal trademark protection.
By Amanda B. Slade
The Board upheld Section 2(e)(3) geographic deceptiveness refusals of the mark shown here (with COPENHAGEN disclaimed) for "tableware, namely, forks, knives, spoons, razors; hunting knives"...
By John L. Welch
[This guest post was written by Stephanie Grace Stella, an associate in the Trademark Group at Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.] The USPTO refused to register the mark FRANCIEPANTS