Contributor Page
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
 
Email  |  Website  |  Articles
Contact Details
Tel: +1 703 413 3000
Fax: +1 703 413 2220
1940 Duke Street
Alexandria
VA 22314
United States
By Richard D. Kelly
Often in writing applications there is a tendency to denigrate prior art techniques.
By Christopher Ricciuti
As we reported a few weeks ago (article here), the PTAB recently designated two decisions as precedential that expand the Board's discretion to deny review of serial IPR petitions (Valve Corp v. Electronic Scripting Prods.)
By James Love
James Love wrote an article entitled "Patent Strategy and The Internet of Medical Things," featured in Med Device Online.
By Stephen McBride, Michael D. West
A recent Delaware decision highlights the need for a realistic pre-suit assessment of patent eligibility. Stephen McBride and Michael West explain.
By Lisa M. Mandrusiak
Valve Corp. v. Electronic Scripting Prods., Inc. addresses follow-on petitions.
By Andy Kim
One of the many topics discussed the challenges of patenting AI, implications of advancing AI technology on IP laws such as copyright and trademarks, and perspectives on AI policies around the world.
By Brian Darville
Google has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari in a copyright infringement suit brought by Oracle after the Federal Circuit twice ruled in favor of Oracle.
By Daniel J. Pereira
Marijuana, for medical purposes and recreational purposes, is an area of great political, social and legal interest.
By Lisa M. Mandrusiak
The PTAB designated three decisions as precedential yesterday (in addition to several in previous weeks).
By Philippe J.C. Signore, Ph.D.
In mid-November 2018, Amazon grabbed headlines when it announced it will build part of its new headquarters in Northern Virginia.
By Christopher Ricciuti
On April 4, 2019, the PTAB designated as precedential its decision in Huawei Device Co., Ltd. v. Optis Cellular Tech., LLC, which provides additional insight on the Trial Practice Guide's good cause standard ...
By Richard D. Kelly
The clinic has filed minerals patent on this invention in an attempt to find a claim the Federal Circuit would find to be patent ineligible.
By Lisa M. Mandrusiak
35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(1) and (2) are the statutory provisions regarding petitioner estoppel in IPRs.
By Robert Tarcu
It is safe to say that Artificial intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning are hot topics and, as with any rapidly growing technological area on the industry side, there is also a rapidly growing number of patent applications being filed.
By Charles L. Gholz
What the panel did was to focus on one limitation in independent claim 1 in GED's patent.