Cayman Islands: A Brave New Crypto World

Last Updated: 25 March 2019
Article by Melissa Lim, Fiona MacAdam, Colette Wilkins and Michael Testori

Most Read Contributor in Cayman Islands, April 2019

1. INTRODUCTION

Blockchain technology. has provided us with new creative opportunities. From alternative democratic and creative funding models to revolutionary information storage/maintenance solutions and applications, the list is almost endless. 2016 and 2017 saw the emergence and popularisation of blockchain technology's ability to create Crypto Assets1 through the Crypto Asset issuance process known as "Initial Coin Offerings" ("ICOs"), though this is by no means the only way to create Crypto Assets using blockchain technology. The Cayman Islands is one of the leading ICO jurisdictions based on funding volume given that the availability of high quality service providers, the predictable legal system and the stable yet progressive political climate all complement and encourage the development of innovative business. Nevertheless, many issuers of and investors in Crypto Assets and many advisors have exclusively focused on legal and regulatory compliance when creating and issuing Crypto Assets. This front-ended focus has led many to overlook the potential challenges that may arise when things don't go according to plan. This could be of particular relevance if Cayman Islands issuers of tokens and Cayman Islands custodians of Crypto Assets become insolvent since, considering their day-to-day business and operational needs, they may hold a substantial amount of their value in Crypto Assets (each such asset having differing degrees of liquidity and worth). This article aims to: (i) highlight some of the technological hurdles that liquidators may face when confronting the technology that underpins this new asset class; and (ii) outline some of the options available to Cayman Islands liquidators when liquidating a Cayman Islands company2 that holds, or held, Crypto Assets.

2. TECHNOLOGICAL HURDLES

2.1 Foresight and Planning

In circumstances like those surrounding recent developments regarding QuadrigaCX,3 one of Canada's largest cryptocurrency exchanges, where due to a lack of diversified storage protocols the death of its founder, who had exclusive access to the encrypted cold wallets holding over US$100 million in cryptocurrency, left the exchange with no way to access the cryptocurrency, liquidators will face enhanced difficulties in retrieving information and applying the tools traditionally available (see Section 3 below). It remains to be seen whether the development of technology and quantum computing can one day provide a solution in accessing the currently inaccessible. If QuadrigaCX had used, for example, multi-signature wallets to hold its cryptocurrency, or structured the storage of its cryptocurrency such that its existence was not entirely reliant on the consciousness of a single person, the inevitable pitfalls for QuadrigaCX could have been avoided. This further stresses the importance of engaging legal and technical advisors who are knowledgeable in this space from the outset.

2.2 Alternative Relief?

Blockchain's irreversible and immutable nature will present challenges to Cayman Islands liquidators. For example, under Cayman Islands law, liquidators can seek to unwind transactions made by a company that occurred in the lead up to a company's liquidation which are later deemed voidable for reasons of fraud or preference. However, unwinding the transfer of Crypto Assets recorded on a blockchain is, in most cases, close to impossible. By virtue of the way blockchain technology records information in an irreversible chronological manner, seeking to unwind a transaction on a blockchain, particularly public blockchains maintained by thousands of miners, would be impossible in most cases.4

Yet, in circumstances where an order sought by a Cayman Islands liquidator is impossible to enforce when confronted with such technological hurdles, liquidators do retain the ability to apply to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands (the "Court") and seek alternative relief including, for example, orders for the payment of money, the transfer of Crypto Assets and other orders requiring a certain alternative action being taken which will assist in circumstances where the typical course of action is ultimately found to be impractical given the idiosyncrasies of this new asset class.

Cayman Islands liquidators can also at any time during the liquidation of a company apply to the Court to seek sanction in respect of any decision or particular course of action. There will no doubt be an increase in these types of sanction and/or validation applications being heard before the Court when the first crypto related liquidation proceedings commence in the Cayman Islands.

2.3 Who to enforce against?

Whilst certain options are available to Cayman Islands liquidators when seeking recourse during the liquidation of a Cayman Islands company that holds, or held, Crypto Assets (see Section 3 below), the availability of such options is dependent on the ability to identify the target to which such recourse will apply. Many Crypto Assets are created and transferred using pseudonymous5 blockchain technology, which typically means that one can identify the parties to a public Crypto Asset transaction but the names used by such parties are rarely their real, legal names. Such pseudonymity can make it difficult, if not impossible in some circumstances, to ascertain the underlying identity of transferors and transferees of Crypto Assets.

Whilst the availability of certain orders will depend on the circumstances and the orders being sought, in an entirely pseudonymous context, where the underlying identity of transferees and transferors of Crypto Assets cannot be ascertained, the ability to hold parties accountable, establish the legal and beneficial ownership of assets, retrieve dissipated Crypto Assets, compel certain action and enforce Court judgments/ orders will inevitably decrease. For example, when dealing with the dissipation of Crypto Assets relating to a public blockchain used by thousands of pseudonymous parties, the ability to seek or compel the cooperation of those maintaining the blockchain and processing Crypto Asset transactions will be limited. However, engaging knowledgeable counsel and technical advisors, either from the outset or during distressed situations, can assist in minimising the impact of the above risks from a legal and financial perspective.

In circumstances where it is possible to identify those maintaining the blockchain for the purposes of compelling cooperation or enforcing a judgment which would result in a change to the blockchain, the costs and practicalities in such circumstances would often be disproportionate to the result sought. It also remains to be seen whether the Court would grant orders that would result in a change to a blockchain (if at all possible) considering the irreparable damage such change would have on legitimate transactions previously recorded on the blockchain and to the reputation of the blockchain and the Crypto Assets to which it relates.

2.4 Where to enforce rights

Blockchain technology's decentralised, global and borderless nature which underpins the maintenance and transfer of many Crypto Assets can sometimes cause uncertainty when determining how and where to enforce rights relating to Crypto Assets held by a company in liquidation. Nevertheless, the default position when dealing with and conducting the liquidation of a Cayman Islands company is that the rights should be enforced in the Cayman Islands. Upon the appointment of liquidators resident in the Cayman Islands, the necessary investigations can then take place to determine if the involvement of other relevant jurisdictions is required in the circumstances.

The Mt Gox case, which was one of the first high profile insolvency proceedings involving a cryptocurrency exchange (noting that such insolvency proceedings have since converted to a civil rehabilitation plan in Japan due to the substantial increase in value of the bitcoin that was retrieved), illustrates the many cross-border issues that insolvency practitioners may confront when dealing with the liquidation of a cryptocurrency business. One of the key issues in this case involved the cross-border recognition of the Japanese proceedings. Upon appointment, the Japanese trustee applied for recognition under Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the United States and sought equivalent recognition orders in Canada to stay pending and active class actions in these jurisdictions. The borderless nature of blockchain technology and the digital assets it underpins will inevitably result in applications for cross-border recognition of insolvency proceedings being made in order for insolvency practitioners to benefit from the moratorium available.

3. LIQUIDATORS' TOOLBOX

Understanding the Crypto Assets held by an entity and how such assets are traded, created and stored is of paramount importance when fulfilling's one's duties as a liquidator and searching through a liquidator's toolbox for the right tool when doing so. Here are some examples of tools that may be useful but their availability will depend on the assets held and the facts involved:

3.1 Section 103 Order

Where a company holds crypto assets and its management is being uncooperative or its crypto assets have been dissipated, Cayman Islands liquidators are able to compel the cooperation of 'relevant persons' as detailed in Section 103 of the Cayman Islands Companies Law (as revised) ("Companies Law") who are under a statutory duty to cooperate with liquidators.6 An application can be made to the Court under Section 103 for the delivery up of property, documents and information belonging to the relevant company and/or seeking an order for an oral examination of any relevant person of the company. To the extent that a relevant person's disclosure obligations have not been adequately satisfied under the terms of any order granted under Section 103, an application could be made to endorse the order with a penal notice. Non-compliance with an order containing a penal notice may constitute a contempt of Court and ultimately render a person liable to be imprisoned.

So where, for example, Crypto Assets have been transferred by a director of the company to a personal E-Wallet or hardware wallet maintained or held by an identifiable third party or by a director, or the transfer of such assets was processed by an exchange or custodian, a Cayman Islands liquidator may be able to compel the cooperation of such persons in connection with the retrieval of such assets. However, in circumstances where a company has failed to establish appropriate protocols for storing its Crypto Assets, retrieving information may prove more difficult (as the court appointed monitor is currently facing in the case of QuadrigaCX).

3.2 Norwich Pharmacal Order

To the extent the liquidator requires information from an individual not covered by section 103, a liquidator can seek a disclosure order known as a "Norwich Pharmacal" order, which compels a party to disclose information in circumstances where one has knowledge of a wrongdoing but not of the identity of the wrongdoer, but can identify another who has such information. Click here for our article on how recent legislative modernisation in the Cayman Islands has enhanced the effectiveness of the Norwich Pharmacal jurisdiction.

3.3 Bankers Trusts Order

A Bankers Trusts Order can be used to compel a third party to disclose details of financial activities which would otherwise be protected by a duty of confidentiality. In situations where there might be fraud, a Bankers Trusts Order can be useful in obtaining information required to urgently trace, recover or preserve assets to support a proprietary asset claim. This tool may prove valuable where the legal entity in liquidation conducted much of its crypto related financial activities via a cryptocurrency exchange or other identifiable third party which would ordinarily be subject to duties of confidentiality.

3.4 Anton Piller Orders

In addition to the availability of Mareva (asset freezing) injunctions in the Cayman Islands, an Anton Piller Order is an injunction (also known as a search and seizure order) designed to preserve evidence or property that is or might be the subject of an action or which may shed some light on the relevant circumstances. As with a Section 103 Order endorsed with a penal notice, a party who fails to comply with an Anton Piller Order may be held in contempt of court. Whilst seizing data may appear to be an attractive option if the location of the data is ascertained, implications surrounding data privacy and/or whether warrants are required to seize such information should be considered.

3.5 Gagging Order

Given the high risk of dissipation of digital assets due to the ease of their transferability (particularly to cold wallets and/or storage) and pseudonymous nature of such assets, gagging orders would be a particularly useful tool in avoiding tipping off certain parties.

3.6 Form of relief

Considering the borderless nature of Crypto Asset transactions, before seeking certain relief for creditors situated in onshore jurisdictions and making distributions in non-FIAT currency, Cayman Islands liquidators should seek onshore tax advice. This will ensure the relief sought marries up with the interests of such creditors, as Crypto Assets can attract different tax determinations with reference to the unique rights and characteristics associated with each type of Crypto Asset and the laws that apply to the transaction and to the creditor.

4. CLASS REMEDIES

Under the Cayman Islands Companies Winding Up Rules, 2018, creditors and contributories of a Cayman Islands company are able to present winding-up petitions in certain circumstances which, if successful, can place a company into official liquidation and potentially provide such creditors or contributories with an opportunity to realise what is owed to them by a company. Whilst establishing yourself as a creditor or contributory of a company, and then conducting the requisite legal analysis as to whether one should or can present a windingup petition is usually relatively straightforward, conducting that analysis when evaluating debtor-creditor or debtor-contributory relationships in a Crypto Asset environment may not be straight forward. The approach of the Cayman Islands legal system to recognise the fungibility of Crypto Assets, whilst protecting the interests of Crypto Asset investors in the Cayman Islands, remains to be tested.

5. CONCLUSION

Whilst there has been an emerging trend for Crypto Asset projects, like ICOs, opting for more hospitable regulatory climates (like the Cayman Islands) than certain onshore jurisdictions, to date any enforcement proceedings against Cayman Islands linked projects have occurred onshore and not in the Cayman Islands. Positive sentiment, both from the public and private sector, surround the development of the Crypto Asset space in the Cayman Islands and we expect to see the development of a Crypto Asset regulatory framework in the near future. Against that background, when Cayman Islands token issuers and other entities holding Crypto Assets become unable to meet their liabilities the tools traditionally available to liquidators will be put to the test in a new, and potentially challenging, environment. Given the commercial and forward-looking approach of the Cayman Islands there is little doubt that this jurisdiction can and will rise to the challenge.

Footnotes

1 For the purposes of this article, the term Crypto Asset refers to distributed ledger products like cryptocurrency (i.e. Bitcoin, Ether), tokens and other Crypto Assets that share similar technological properties.

2 Reference to companies and liquidators in this article are limited to Cayman Islands companies and liquidators.

3 See the recent case of QuadrigaCX, one of Canada's largest cryptocurrency exchanges that serviced over 92,000 customers, which recently filed for creditor protection in Nova Scotia after its founder, Gerald Cotton, who had exclusive access to the encrypted cold wallets holding over US$100 million in cryptocurrency, died in India leaving the exchange with no way to access the cryptocurrency. Recent reports have since confirmed that the cold wallets were emptied prior to Gerald Cotton's death. 4 Such impossibility stems from the requirement to obtain a consensus (in most cases) of more than 50% of the miners of that blockchain to reverse the transaction. Despite the majority of blockchains pegging their consensus threshold to more than 50%, we note that such threshold levels may differ when analysing different blockchains. It is also unlikely that such consensus would be obtained as the reversal of transactions recorded on a blockchain would require a significant expenditure of resources and would unfairly impact legitimate transactions that have been previously recorded on the blockchain and consequently damage the reputation associated to that particular blockchain. When dealing with private blockchains maintained by a central entity or very few identifiable entities, whilst compelling such entities to unwind a transaction may be legally possible, it would generally demand a disproportionate and extortionate expenditure of resources, mainly financial, computing power and time, and may also cause irreparable damage to the reputation of the blockchain and any affiliated companies, thus rendering such recourse inappropriate in many cases.

5 Anonymity means that someone's identity is completely unknown. Pseudonymous means you are not using your real, legal name to identify yourself (https:// english.stackexchange.com/questions/224254/whats-the-difference-between-anonymous-and-pseudonymous/224263)

6 Liquidators can hire service providers who can assist in investigating the source and destination of Crypto Asset transactions, increasing the likelihood of liquidators identifying targets to their ability to compel cooperation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions