Canada: Canadian Competition Bureau's Very Busy March: Updated Guidance Regarding Enforcement In Three Key Areas


The Competition Bureau (Bureau), Canada's antitrust law enforcement agency, had a very busy March 2019. In addition to seeing the appointment of Matthew Boswell as Commissioner of Competition (Commissioner), the Bureau issued updated guidelines concerning its enforcement approach to abuse of dominance and intellectual property, as well as slightly revised Immunity and Leniency Programs.


  • Matthew Boswell appointed Commissioner of Competition for a five-year term.
  • Competition Bureau issues new and substantially revised Abuse of Dominance Enforcement Guidelines, which notably omit the longstanding 35 percent market share safe harbour threshold.
  • Minor changes to the Bureau's Intellectual Property Enforcement Guidelines, and Immunity and Leniency Programs.

New-Old Commissioner

The Government of Canada announced the appointment of Matthew Boswell as Commissioner on March 5, 2019.1 Appointed for a five-year term, Mr. Boswell had been serving as Interim Commissioner since May 2018, when his predecessor, John Pecman, retired following a long career at the Bureau. Since joining the Bureau in 2011, Mr. Boswell served in senior management positions in its Criminal Matters Branch (similar to Mr. Pecman). Immediately prior to his appointment as Interim Commissioner, Mr. Boswell had served as Senior Deputy Commissioner, Mergers and Monopolistic Practices Branch.

Updated Abuse of Dominance Enforcement Guidelines

The Bureau issued new Abuse of Dominance Enforcement Guidelines on March 7, 2019 (Abuse Guidelines). The new Abuse Guidelines provide new insight to the Bureau's approach to enforcement in this area.

In Canada, abuse of dominance, similar in concept to section 2 "monopolization" in the United States2 and Article 102 "abuse of dominant position" in the European Union,3 concerns anticompetitive conduct by a dominant firm that can be challenged by the Bureau in the Competition Tribunal (Tribunal) on the basis of anti-competitive effects. The three requisite elements of abuse of dominance are: 1. A "dominant" firm or firms ("one or more persons [who] substantially or completely control, throughout Canada or any area thereof, a class or species of business"); 2. The dominant firm or firms are engaging in a "practice of anti-competitive acts"; and 3. The practice of anti-competitive acts results in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in a market.4

Abuse of dominance in Canada can only be challenged by the Bureau in the Tribunal, and the remedies are generally limited to prohibition orders (requiring the dominant firm or firms to cease the relevant anticompetitive conduct), and administrative monetary penalties (AMPs) of up to CA$10 million for a first instance or CA$15 million for subsequent instances. An important distinction between Canada and other jurisdictions' treatment of abuse of dominance/monopolization is that, in Canada, no damages are available and there is no private right of access.

Among the changes to the Abuse Guidelines from the immediate past iteration in 2012, we consider the following the most significant and of general interest:

  • The Bureau now considers dominance - which the Competition Act (Act) defines as a circumstance where one or more persons "substantially or completely control, throughout Canada or any area thereof, a class or species of business" - to mean that the relevant firm holds "a substantial degree of market power". Earlier versions of the Abuse Guidelines suggested market power alone was sufficient.
  • Notwithstanding, the Bureau has given itself more liberty to pursue potentially powerful market participants whose market share might fall below levels traditionally assumed to reflect unilateral market power. Specifically, the Bureau abandoned the 35 percent market share safe harbour threshold, below which the Bureau previously stated it would not generally further investigate a single firm. This is consistent with recent enforcement activity, including the Bureau's (now closed) grocery industry investigation, where the market share of the firm under scrutiny was below 35 percent, and where the Bureau noted that "market share may be a less informative indicator of market power, and accordingly, should be afforded less weight, in cases involving upstream buying markets in the grocery sector."5 The new Abuse Guidelines specify that a market share above 50 percent will generally prompt further investigation, but a market share below 50 percent will only prompt further investigation if it appears the firm possesses a "substantial degree of market power" and can exercise that substantial degree of market power within a "reasonable time while the conduct is ongoing".6
  • The new Abuse Guidelines specify that the Bureau will encourage voluntary compliance and negotiations to achieve a Consent Agreement registered with the Tribunal (such Consent Agreements have the effect of a court order). In appropriate circumstances, the Abuse Guidelines state that a Consent Order may include both prohibition on the impugned conduct, as well as requirements that the firm take "positive steps" to restore competition.
  • The encouragement of voluntary compliance is also consistent with the Bureau's position in the new Abuse Guidelines that it will not necessarily seek AMPs as a matter of course, but will base decisions on whether to seek AMPs on factors such as a firm's willingness to cooperate with the Bureau in a timely manner, history of compliance, and state of mind regarding compliance (i.e., intention to not comply vs. wanton or reckless disregard). The new Abuse Guidelines also specify that the quantum of AMPs sought will be based on the competitive effects of the conduct, revenues generated, profits (real or anticipated), financial position of the firm, compliance history, and any other relevant factor.

Updated Intellectual Property Enforcement Guidelines

On March 13, 2019, the Bureau released an updated Intellectual Property Enforcement Guidelines (IPEGs), with minor revisions from the last version.

The Bureau has long maintained that antitrust law and intellectual property law (copyright, trademark, patents, and other regimes that bestow rights over intangibles) are not adverse, but "complimentary instruments of government policy that promote an efficient economy."7 The Act itself mentions intellectual property twice explicitly – in one section,8 by providing a special remedy for anti-competitive effects that result from the exercise of patent, trademark, copyright, or integrated circuit topography rights on application by the Attorney General of Canada; and in another section, by specifying that conduct engaged in, pursuant only to the exercise of intellectual property rights (under the relevant intellectual property legislation), is not an anti-competitive act under the abuse of dominance provisions.9

The Bureau's longstanding approach to intellectual property involves a dichotomy of two kinds of conduct: first, conduct that involves the "mere exercise of the IP right", and second, conduct involving "something more than the mere exercise of the IP right". Regarding conduct involving the "mere exercise" of IP rights, the Bureau will only seek a special remedy for such "mere exercise" conduct where the relevant IP statute is not effective. The Bureau's principal concern is with the "something more" category of conduct, where the Bureau will investigate the conduct under the Act's ordinary civil provisions (for example, refusal to deal, price maintenance, exclusive dealing, tied selling, market restriction and abuse of dominance), and criminal provisions (for example, cartel conspiracy, foreign directives and bid rigging). Intellectual property in this way is treated in the same way as ordinary property, and the Bureau states that it, "does not presume that the conduct violates the general provisions of the Act or needs to be remedied under section 32 [the special remedy]."10

The last significant update to the IPEGs was issued in 2016. In that prior version, the Bureau specified its approach to, amongst other things, settlements of patent litigation between generic and innovator drug companies, patent assertion entities (sometimes referred to as "patent trolls"), and standard essential patents. Regarding its approach to settlements between generic and innovator drug companies, the Bureau takes the position that 1. Settlements that involve a generic entering the market prior to patent expiry do not generally pose an issue; 2. Settlements that involve a payment to the generic and generic entry on or prior to expiry of the patent may be reviewable conduct under the civil provisions of the Act; while 3. Criminal enforcement may ensure if the settlement delays generic entry past patent expiry, involves products other than those at issue in the litigation, or is otherwise a "sham". The IPEGs specifically state the Bureau recognizes that Canada has a unique regulatory environment for patented drugs under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (PMNOC Regulations) that incentivizes settlements, including exclusivity afforded to the first generic firm to challenge a patent and the potential for a patent holder to be liable to a generic firm for damages. The relevant regulations also used to permit two potential tracks of litigation – one where the generic challenges the patent; and another where (assuming the patent holder is successful in the first instance) the patent holder seeks damages against the generic for infringement. Reflecting the elimination of the possibility of the dual track as a result of amendment to the PMNOC Regulations, the revised IPEGs omit reference to dual track risk for litigation commenced after September 21, 2017.

Update to Immunity and Leniency Programs

On March 15, 2019, the Bureau released a slightly updated version of its Immunity and Leniency Programs,11 used by the Bureau to detect and investigate cartel conspiracy conduct. In this new technical guidance document, the Bureau specifies that notwithstanding it does not generally identify them publicly, cooperating witnesses under the programs are not considered "confidential informers" and do not benefit from informer privilege.12

The Immunity and Leniency Programs are longstanding and generally modelled after the Leniency Program administered by the US Department of Justice.13 Pursuant to the Bureau's programs, a party may qualify for "Immunity" from prosecution if (a) the Bureau is unaware of the offence and the party is the first to disclose the elements of the offence, or (b) the Bureau is aware of the offence and the party is the first to come forward prior to a referral of the matter for prosecution. Subsequent applicants can apply for "Leniency" (lenient treatment in sentencing recommendation), which requires cooperation and a guilty plea.

The recent minor update follows more significant changes to the Immunity and Leniency Programs in September 2018. The 2018 amendments ended the automatic provision of immunity to a corporate immunity applicant's officers, directors and employees, replaced by a requirement that any implicated individuals provide cooperation to qualify. Furthermore, the amendments provided that no automatic fine reduction will be issued based on when a leniency applicant first contacts the Bureau. Instead, fine reductions are now based on the value placed on the cooperation. As well, the 2018 amendments suggested that witness interviews might be recorded or taken under oath.

In sum, although undertaken to ensure a higher chance of success by the Director of Public Prosecutions in any subsequent prosecution of non-cooperating parties, the 2018 amendments have resulted in the Immunity and Leniency Programs varying from practice in other jurisdictions, including the US. As a result, the Canadian programs might be considered less attractive to potential applicants, especially for conduct outside of Canada.


1. Government of Canada, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, News Release: Government of Canada appoints Matthew Boswell Commissioner of Competition (March 5, 2019), online.

2. Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §2: "Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court."

3. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, O.J. 115, 09/05/2008 P. 0089 – 0089, Art. 102: "Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the internal market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the internal market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States."

4. Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34, s. 79.

5. Competition Bureau (Canada), Competition Bureau statement regarding its inquiry into alleged anti-competitive conduct by Loblaw Companies Limited (November 21, 2017), online.

6. Competition Bureau (Canada), Abuse of Dominance Enforcement Guidelines (March 7, 2019), online.

7. Competition Bureau (Canada), Intellectual Property Enforcement Guidelines (March 13, 2019), para. 3, online.

8. Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34, s. 32.

9. Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34, s. 79(5).

10. Competition Bureau (Canada), Intellectual Property Enforcement Guidelines (March 13, 2019), para. 6, online.

11. Competition Bureau (Canada), Immunity and Leniency Programs under the Competition Act (March 15, 2019), online.

12. Competition Bureau (Canada), News Release: Update to Immunity and Leniency Programs clarifies status of cooperating witnesses (March 15, 2019), online.

13. United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Leniency Program, online.

About Dentons

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions