Canada: Country Risk Analysis For Investment Decisions And Corporate Strategy (Video)

Last Updated: June 12 2018
Article by Paul M. Murphy

As part of Gowling WLG's Special Projects Series, Paul Murphy, Managing Director of Gowling WLG's Energy Group, recently sat down with Michael Samis, Associate partner at Ernst & Young, and John Seddon, Principal at Canada Control Risks, for a discussion on country risk analysis for investment decisions and corporate strategy.

Country Risk - Part 1



Paul Murphy: My name is Paul Murphy, managing director at Gowling WLG and today we're here with Michael Samis, Associate Partner at Ernst & Young and John Seddon, Principle at Control Risk, and today we're talking about the issue of country risk.

All of us in our respective businesses deal with this issue on a variety of projects, and the world continues to remind us time and again that it's a very complicated place.You know, we've seen just within the last week with the US withdrawing from the JCPOA, the impact on Boeing's potential deal for airplanes.We see Total saying that they'll probably have to withdraw from their major project that was scheduled for Iran, and so when we deal with major projects — particularly infrastructure projects — we learn time and again that all countries aren't created equal and that when you put a project in a particular place, where you're putting it starts to matter very much.So what we've intended to do is in this two-part series is talk about the topic of country risk, first at a high conceptual level, and then really in the second session, get into some of the analytical tools.

So in starting with first principles on country risks, John — what do we really mean when we're talking about country risk and what are the biggest risk categories and considerations when we talk about the subject?

John Seddon: A  part of the real challenge in all of this is that there's not really any single universally accepted definition of what country risk is and different companies who look at it in different ways, but broadly speaking, the sorts of things that are typically considered are economic factors, political factors, operational factors, and then crucially, some social factors — and in particular, how some of that can sort of manifested some of this.Those social factors and social risks can manifest themselves in operational challenge and even sometimes security challenges.Now, what I'd say is perhaps most interesting when considering country risk is that, whereas in the past you know it was quite clear when there was an event, you know you that you would have perhaps nationalization or expropriation, and always quite clear when that event occurred and it was quite dramatic.More recently, things have shifted quite significantly with those sorts of events that are comparatively rare, and we have many more cases where companies are impacted by point.In particular, say we think of the resources sector with issues around permitting, for instance, and this can have quite a significant impact on projects and then obviously for share prices as well; and some of the other impacts we see are, you know, quite local levels I mentioned before — some of the social risk issues, but also things like actions of local security forces and how companies and projects engage with them and manage them in support of their operations.

Paul Murphy: So why the companies want to assess country risk early on, what are the benefits and what are some of the shortcomings if they're failing to look at the actual location of where this project is going to be and just seeing it like a project like any other project.

John Seddon: Well it's crucial to look at it from a very early stage given that really assessment of a country which should form part of strategy formulation and ultimately how a project is structured and doing it in an energy iterative way what allows acompany or a project to carefully understand the context in which it's operating both its sort of national level sub-national level and then consider that the local dynamics around a project and also from an early stage consider perhaps what sort of controls would be appropriate be that in the way the financing is set perhaps some of the sort of more operational controls go through the design construction and ultimately operation of a project.

Paul Murphy: You mentioned in your answer just now the financing aspect do you find that this is something that project developers need to aggressively manage and their dialogue with the bank's in terms of the diligence process so that it's both something that they're doing internally and assessing their decision to go forward and how they manage the project, but also if they're going out for project financing is one technique that's a dialogue not just for themselves, but with their lenders as well.

John Seddon: It's quite often that it's a high priority item that is carefully considered, so it's what we'd say though and what we find is that some of the some of the ways in which these issues are considered and then ultimately integrate into the decision-making process perhaps could benefit from greater rigor in terms of how things are modeled.

Paul Murphy: Let's talk about a particular sector and sort of assessing the problem a little bit more.We thought about natural resources and that's one, Mike, how in that sector this country risk play may be a unique role even differently maybe than other types of infrastructure investments? What do you see in that sector specifically?

Michael Samis: Yeah so obviously mining being and oil and gas being a you know global business, country risk has a big impact on Global Investments and obviously a big concern for a lot of the mining and oil and gas companies. The issue for them there's a number of special I'd say special characteristics in these investments that make country risk a sort of a larger concern you know particularly around the fact that you're investing in a movable asset so it's not like you can take your mine or your gas field or oil field and move it if you know a country becomes unstable.There's also issues around, you know, large upfront capital investments; so you're investing a lot of money over a long period to get your project or investment up and running and the issue will be that once you're in there, you're very exposed to possibly losing that capital or not making the returns that you were expecting.

We do have issues around commodity price cycles where, when money prices are high, these assets will make what seems like excessive profits; and so that makes it a target for government actions, particularly around when there's revenue shortfalls — and then the other aspect also is that you may find in country that there's a bias against foreign ownership that can come out in various government actions; and also you may be finding you're competing against other country or other countries for, you know, very good assets.It's not like there's a lot of great assets around the world, so you may find you're dealing with other country champions and businessesthat may try to take your asset away; so these sort of perspectives, they can cause outside country risk effect.

We see that quite recently in the mining industry, last year,Acacia mining out in Tanzania was unable to export concentrates and that caused, over a month, a decline in share price of 20%.More recently with Kinross, they weren't given an expand permit to expand one of their mines, and within a day, there was a 20% drop in their shirt price.So, I mean, these are big issues and companies need to consider them when they're making their investments and have a plan for them.

Paul Murphy: Is it fair to say that that when we're looking at country risk, it's not just a moment in time?Things like natural resourcesare making a long-term play; you're having to project out over long periods of time which complicates the analysis at a lot of different levels because now you're having to factor in political cycles and changes in market conditions. I mean, how does that complicate the analysis?

Michael Samis: Well it definitely does. You know you're investing for over a longer period; you knowyour exploration and development period; you know maybe anywhere from five to ten years and then you're operating the project from ten years up to sixty or seventy; and so, you do have these... you know you have to consider that in the way you look at your investments.So you're looking at the investment over its entire cycle. So that creates an issue about the types of projects you might want to get into, you know.Investing a large amount of capital for a very long time in a moderate risk country can actually be more risky than investing a smaller amount of capital and a high risk jurisdiction where your project life is shorter; and so you have to start thinking carefully about what type of projects that I want to invest in, and where in the world, how do we share the risk, and all these sorts of issues.

Paul Murphy: How do companies generally approach country risk in your experiences? I mean what general policies do they have?Where do they evaluate it, in your experience?

John Seddon: Well there's quite a bit of variation between companies' floors, so some companies have very large in-house teams, government affairs, government relations teams who have this as part of their team.Since comms teams will also play a role as well as legal teams, in gathering raw information from media, from third parties, and so on with qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis and synthetic houses, as well in order to sort of provide a picture of what is going on in a specific jurisdiction or region or what have you — what we often find though, is that analysis is not necessarily translated as effectively as it could be into investment decisions and into how portfolios are managed; and I think that's where there's significant opportunity to better manage country risk in in a way that is more aligned to how organizations manage other types of risk across their wholeness.

Paul Murphy: I mean given that answer, what do you think are some of the elements that are missing?Do you see that it's an issue of lack of appreciation of the country and its history and internal dynamics, and they just see it from afar?Or is it market conditions or not having good intel on the ground and maintaining that? What are some of the shortfalls that you're seeing that either companies aren't doing or they think they've maybe done an adequate job of, but in fact they're missing key elements?

John Seddon: It's of course tough to make generalizations; but one issue that companies seem to be challenged by in many instances is that because there isn't necessarily the means to translate solid analysis into how strategic decisions are made in terms of capital locations, there's not the — I would say — adequate imperative to get that pro analysis right and to ensure that there is great sort of combination of national level factors combined with issues that may have more to do with some of the partners that one organization is working with or maybe some of the local government dynamics or a whole host of other issues.And so it's that, with a more nuanced approach, to translating those inputs into decision-making then that would create a greater imperative to do a sort of more detailed analysis in the first place.

Paul Murphy: It seems that a lot of this could be very subjective but then there's probably an opportunity for analytics as well.In terms of data-driven analysis, how would both of you assess the balance between the subjective things like projecting the stability of a particular government versus other types of things that could be more data-driven?And, how should companies maybe combine the two to get a more robust result?

John Seddon: You're right — it is a challenge to ensure there's a sufficient amount of data underpinning some of these country risk factors, particularly in some of the more complex jurisdictions in the world.It is tough to get that those quantifiable indicators would say that there is certainly value in using those when they are available, but one can't get away from the value that can be provided by people who have very in-depth knowledge and understanding of the political dynamics — in particular in a country in a specific area — and are able to leverage resources that they may have access to in order to understand how different levels of government interface with one another how maybe a project or a company's operation may adversely or positively affect some of the factors that we've been discussing then. Of course looking ahead there is, we think significant opportunity to use more data and more analytic techniques to bring greater rigor and to formalize the entirety of the process make the other thing.

Michael Samis: You know, I think the interesting thing about looking at country risk and trying to model it, you know, it's not like we're going in and trying to look at commodity price uncertainty where we have you know a large amount of historic price information and financial market information that can help us characterize it; so the issue for us going forward, when we try to actually model this and in some detail, it's going to be taking, you know, the qualitative aspect and the experience of people on the ground understanding you know the company's country structures or the local conditions, the, you know, issues around international organizations and things and trying to translate that into you know a more quantitative assessment.And so there's going to be a certain level of subjectivity I guess you could say, but you know, that's fine because what we're trying uses a more quantitative approach to do is you know provide us a way of you know some rigor to our thinking and to see how things potentially play out in terms of cash flow effects and its impact on the value of your investment and the risk exposure.

Paul Murphy: How do you see this sort of traditionally translated in corporate decisions?Is it more of a risk premium so that it goes into the final economic price, or economic valuation that there's a kicker, if you will, for some additional risk in that country?Or in that particular line of work?Or is it a no-go decision, you know, in terms of we're either gonna do this or not?Or is it adding in some mitigation strategies?How do you see companies generally pursue the analysis once they've taken a look at Country Risk?Is a consideration how historically do they tend to translate that into their behavior going forward?

Michael Samis: Yeah, so I think when you we're thinking about some kind of program to manage country risk, you know what we're suggesting is you're gonna be going into a little bit more detail and bit more depth about, you know, its impact on your investments and so we've been looking at the effective country risk over the life cycle of the project and, you know, there's you know the upfront consideration about whether we should invest and there you'll be thinking about you know how are you an investor our capital you know, how do we share the risk through different forms of financing or joint venturing and those sort of things.Once we are in a country and we have an investment up and running we're obviously going to be monitoring it and trying to you know to track potential risks that could impact the value of your investment for your shareholders and [Music] understand how this you know how your investments are affected and the exposure and then you're gonna bring that up to the corporate level and understand how all your different investments around the world come together and expose your company overall. So, it's, you know processes in more detail more depth where we're trying to understand the cash flow effects of country risk how that creates a risk exposure for you and then how that comes up to the corporate level and it impacts your company overall.

Paul Murphy: So, based on those comments, clearly country risk analysis is not just something that you do as a "check the box" activity before you make your final investment decision; that's sort of an ongoing you know a robust country risk program if you will would not just be at the front end but you would be considering that issue throughout the life of the project and maybe planning at the beginning when you're making that investment decision, how you might have in place mitigation techniques over the life of the project or key stages of the project. Is that a fair comment?

Michael Samis: It is because you know you're really looking for a framework in which to you know first off understand what sort of you know what sort of country risk you're exposed to any other different types you know the different actors that are out there and how they can impact your project. You then also have to be able to perform some analysis around there - under you know to get a sense of you know the importance of the different risks and their potential impacts. You also have to think about you know how potentially you might mitigate what sort of strategies that you might employ, you know initially when you're thinking about how to invest but then once you are in-country. And then lastly you know, over the life of your investment something's gonna happen so you need to be thinking about how you're going to respond and so that this needs to be a formal program people have to get prepared for these things they have to think them through from the start and it's not something that you know you just summarize as a risk premium.It needs to be more detailed it has to be thought through and it has to be treated as an important impact or consideration in your investment.

Paul Murphy: And then presumably if you if you're considering these mitigation strategies or contingency planning you're then pricing that at some level into your modeling to make that that final investment decision at the to the project.

Michael Samis:That's correct.

Paul Murphy: Okay, well that concludes our first discussion on Country Risk our second stage will move into more of the analytics; so thank you both for your time and I look forward to talking to you on the next subject.

Thank you very much.

Michael Samis & John Seddon: Thank you

Stay tuned for Part 2 of this talk which will be available next week!

Read the original article on

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
7 Nov 2019, Seminar, Birmingham, UK

Providing content specifically tailored to the needs of GCs and Heads of Legal working in government organisations and their affiliates.

14 Nov 2019, Seminar, London, UK

Providing content specifically tailored to the needs of GCs and Heads of Legal working in government organisations and their affiliates.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions