Canada: Newfoundland Court Of Appeal Outlines The Required Elements For A Contractual Defence Of Unconscionability

Last Updated: October 5 2017
Article by Andrew C Griffin and Jodey Therriault

Whether or not a contract is legally enforceable is a question that garners considerable attention within the legal community.  When faced with making this determination, courts are required to balance the competing interests of preserving the sanctity of freedom of contract with equitable principles of negotiation. Where a court finds that a party has unduly taken advantage of an inequality of bargaining power between the contracting parties, it is within their discretion to apply an equitable remedy and, in some circumstances, set the contract aside.  Unconscionability is one such remedy. Its application by the courts, however, has been largely inconsistent. This inconsistency has created uncertainty and unpredictability around this equitable remedy. That said, developments in the interpretation and application of the principle of unconscionability are relevant to lenders, especially those who, in certain situations, use standard form or non-negotiable agreements with their clients.  In a recent appellate decision, the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal has highlighted some important issues of relevance to all contracting parties (including lenders) when considering how to proactively insulate contracts from being set aside on the equitable grounds of unconscionability, and has provided welcomed clarification and some much-needed guidance in an area of Canadian law that is famously unsettled.

The decision in Downer v Pitcher considered the enforceability of a release agreement between Roger Downer ("Downer") and Elizabeth Pitcher ("Pitcher") that was executed after an automobile collision[1]. In response to a subsequent personal injury claim brought by Pitcher, Downer sought to rely on the agreement, which released him of all liability related to the collision.  Pitcher claimed that the agreement was unconscionable and should be set aside.

While operating her taxi, Pitcher was rear-ended by Downer while stopped.  After the collision, Downer agreed to pay to have Pitcher's taxi repaired and pay compensation for her loss of income while the taxi was unavailable.  Since Pitcher advised that she did not sustain any major injuries, Downer chose not to put the claim through his insurer.  Downer's insurer cautioned him that he could be liable for personal injury claims in the future, unless the parties executed a release form.  Downer obtained a standard release agreement from a friend (a lawyer) and asked Pitcher if she would sign it.  The document, titled "Full and Final Release", was very clear – it released Downer from any and all liability arising from the collision, including personal injury loss.  Pitcher, having not read the document and without legal advice, signed the document.  In an effort to regain her right to sue for personal injury losses, Pitcher urged the Court to set aside the contract on the grounds of unconscionability.  The trial court agreed with Pitcher and set the contract aside.  The Court of Appeal, however, overturned the trial court's decision and rejected Pitcher's arguments, concluding that the release agreement was valid and enforceable.

Although this particular case involved two individuals in a motor vehicle collision and a release form rather than a fulsome contract, the principles highlighted in the judgment apply broadly to contract law as a whole and, in particular, the Court's approach to setting aside contracts based on equitable remedies.  The Court of Appeal recognized that unconscionability is a special defence grounded in equity and, if expanded without restraint, could seriously erode freedom of contract and inhibit regular business activity.[2]  In other words, it is not designed to protect foolish parties from entering into a bad deal.[3]  The Court of Appeal reviewed the jurisprudence and distilled the defence down to two main principles, or two necessary prerequisites the Court requires before it will consider setting aside a contract on the basis of unconscionability, which are as follows:

  1. there exists inequality of bargaining power between the parties resulting from or created by a special and significant disadvantage by reason of some conditions or circumstance that provides an opportunity for the other party to take advantage of the party suffering from disadvantage;[4] and
  2. the other party unfairly or unconscientiously took advantage of that opportunity.[5]

If a party is successful in proving the elements above, the contract is not necessarily void.  The "advantaged" party can defend their actions by proving one of multiple defences.[6]

The lessons to be extracted from this case that could be relevant in the commercial lending industry include: (i) the contract must be clearly drafted; (ii) the behaviour of the parties must not suggest unfairness; and (iii) the accessibility and use of legal advice is important.

With respect to the first item, the Court of Appeal spent a considerable amount of time discussing the clarity of the release agreement.  Not only does having a clear agreement avoid uncertainty, it reduces what is admissible as extrinsic evidence to the agreement itself.[7]  In other words, Pitcher's argument failed, in part, because she chose not to read a contract that was clear and unambiguous. This highlights the need for lenders to ensure contracts are clearly drafted.

Secondly, there was no evidence that Pitcher was rushed or pressured into signing the release, nor could it be shown that she signed it out of desperation.  The Court's attention to these details highlights the importance of the behaviour of the parties – unfair behaviour supports the presumption that the party in power is aware (and taking advantage of) the weaker party's disadvantage.  This emphasizes the need for lenders to ensure any delivery deadlines are fair and reasonable and to provide enough time for a full and proper review of the contract(s).  Failing to do so (by imposing hasty turnaround requirements, for example) may in some cases open to the door to this type of equitable remedy.

Lastly, the opportunity to obtain and use legal advice is a significant factor.[8]  Pitcher, having been notified prior to the parties meeting that Downer wanted her to sign a release, had in the Court's view ample opportunity to obtain legal advice.  Additionally, she had actual experience signing a similar release in concluding a settlement in the past.  Given Pitcher's familiarity with a comparable release, combined with the fact that she had time to retain a lawyer but chose not to do so, the Court of Appeal showed little sympathy for her situation.[9]  With respect to lenders who typically conduct business with clients who are represented by legal counsel, this is generally not an issue.  If, on the other hand, a lender is contracting with a borrower and/or guarantor that is unrepresented, it would be prudent for the lender to suggest (and in some circumstances insist) that the borrower and guarantor obtain legal advice or independent legal advice prior to signing the documentation.  Any waiver of the recommendation to obtain independent legal advice should be fully documented in writing.

This case emphasizes the need for all contracting parties, including lenders, to consider the relationship they have with the other contracting parties and take the appropriate precautions described above to avoid contracts being challenged, and potentially set aside, on the ground of unconscionability.  Lenders should consider consulting their in-house counsel or outside counsel if there is any doubt as to whether independent legal advice is recommended or required in any transaction, or if an allegation of unconscionability could potentially be raised in any transaction.


[1]Downer v Pitcher, 2017 NLCA 13 at para 11, 409 DLR (4th) 542 [Downer v Pitcher].

[2] Ibid, paras 24-29.

[3] Ibid, para 64.

[4] Inequality of bargaining power could arise in connection with personal characteristics or situational characteristics.  Personal inequality could include disadvantage resulting from age, immaturity, senility, mental weakness, physical disability, or ignorance resulting from lack of access to critical information.  Situational inequality could include disadvantage resulting from severe financial need, pressure, or dependence based on a trust or confidential relationship.

[5] The party to which the benefit accrues must know or ought, as a reasonable person in those circumstances, to have known of the special and significant disadvantage.

[6] The party facing a remedy of unconscionability can save the contract by showing (i) the resulting transaction was not unfair and did not confer an undue advantage; (ii) the disadvantaged party had the benefit of legal advice and chose to continue with the transaction anyway; (iii) the advantaged party took steps to bring the unequal circumstances to the attention of the disadvantaged party; and (iv) any other recognized equitable defence.

[7] Extrinsic evidence in this context includes, but is not limited to, written and verbal communications exchanged beyond the explicit terms in the contract.

[8] Supra note 1, para 51.

[9] Ibid, para 64.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
7 Nov 2019, Seminar, Birmingham, UK

Providing content specifically tailored to the needs of GCs and Heads of Legal working in government organisations and their affiliates.

14 Nov 2019, Seminar, London, UK

Providing content specifically tailored to the needs of GCs and Heads of Legal working in government organisations and their affiliates.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions