Canada: Saugeen First Nation v Ontario: Court Comments On Crown Role And Consultation Funding

Last Updated: July 27 2017
Article by Julie Abouchar

Nation v Ontario.1 In many ways, this decision describes a case study for the wrong way to consult. By way of contrast, the Court took the opportunity to clarify the importance of a Crown-led coherent, structured process for the duty to consult and offered brief comment on the role of consultation funding for Indigenous groups.

Overview

In 2008, T & P Hayes Ltd (Hayes) applied for a licence to quarry limestone from private property on the Saugeen/Bruce Peninsula in the traditional territory of the Saugeen Ojibway Nation (SON).

SON received periodically updated lists of outstanding aggregate licence applications from the Crown. The list contained dozens of applications and SON had one staff member to attend to all SON environmental matters. In 2008, the Crown added the Hayes application to that general list sent to SON. Hayes fulfilled its statutory public notice obligations with advertisements in the local newspapers and signs at the site itself.

In September 2011, SON learned about the licence application through a notice of zoning change. SON asserted its concerns to the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF). By this time, the quarry project was in advanced stages of planning. SON requested that activity and approval for the projects not proceed until consultation had taken place, and provided a flow chart suggesting a consultation process.

What followed was correspondence between SON and MNRF wherein the Court found that MNRF attempted to address preliminary issues and substantive issues all at once. In other words, before setting out a process that would allow for a meaningful exchange of information, MNRF wanted to understand SON's concerns about the licence application itself.2

Following a meeting in 2012, MNRF offered to provide some funding to SON to participate in the consultation process. In February 2013, MNRF advised that it intended to recommend approval of the licence and terminate consultations unilaterally. In June 2013, MNRF set out a consultation process that delegated many consultative duties to Hayes. Hayes refused to deal directly with SON, and MNRF did not implement the consultation process.

On March 8, 2016, the MNRF approved the licence application. SON brought an application for judicial review of the decision to issue the licence.

Decision of the Court

The Court set aside the licence approval without prejudice to it being reissued following appropriate consultation with SON.

At trial, both parties agreed that the Crown holds the constitutional duty to consult SON. However, they disagreed on the scope of the duty and whether it had been reasonably discharged. The Court found that it could not know whether substantive concerns had been addressed because the process itself was deeply flawed:

The Court reviewed several specific aspects of the consultation process.

Notice

The Court found that SON did not learn about the Hayes application at the time that its licence application was added to the general list as there were more than 500 quarries in SON's traditional territory and dozens of applications on the general list at any one time.

The Court held that notice must be affirmatively established by the Crown.3 Notice cannot be inferred.

Preliminary Assessment of the Scope of Consultation

MNRF asserted that it completed an assessment of the Crown's duty to consult in 2009, and assessed it to be low. There are no records of this assessment. The Crown did not advise SON of these assessments until 2011.

The Court several times made reference to the failure of the Crown to provide notice of its assessment of the scope of the duty to SON.

Structure of the Consultation Process

The Court found that MNRF was "reactive and ad hoc" throughout the consultation process.4 This finding is borne out by the record, where the process starts and stops, and at times is unilaterally terminated by MNRF.

The Court reviewed MNRF's communications that set expectations for process and noted that the process was not followed, nor was an alternate process put in place. The Court held that, moving forward the Crown had an obligation to adhere to process that it set out.

The proper process now, is for MNRF to fund SON as it agreed to do, for SON to obtain the expert assistance it requires, and for the parties to then discuss SON's concerns. It will be for the Crown to decide what process to follow if unresolved issues remain after these consultations.5

The Court emphasized that consultation processes are not set in stone, and may change over time. However, it is for the Crown to devise the consultation process, and once that process is established it is not reasonable to change the process without explanation.6

Funding

The Court found that MNRF had agreed to provide SON with funding, and so did not have to make a determination about whether the duty to consult implies a duty to provide consultation funding. However, the Court offered the following comments about the context in which SON requested funding:

SON has limited resources. It does not participate in consultations as a party to the Project. The expense of consultation arises as a result of a proponent's desire to pursue a project, usually for gain, and the Crown's desire to see the project move ahead. The Crown should not reasonably expect SON to absorb consultation costs from SON's general resources in these circumstances.7

Ultimately, the Court found that, in the absence of an agreement to provide funding, it is "open to the Crown, in an appropriate case, to reject a request for funding and to decide that a First Nation did not require expert assistance to participate adequately in consultations. Such a decision would be reviewed in this court on a standard of reasonableness."8

Implications

The Court reinforced the importance of the Crown's role to provide structured consultation. Repeatedly, the Court referred to Haida Nation in rejecting an unstructured administrative regime as insufficient.9 The Crown alone bears the burden of identifying the Indigenous groups to be consulted, affirmatively providing notice, clarifying the process and scope of the consultation, and supervising the consultation. In this instance, the proponent declined to take on delegated consultation. While any proponent may decline to perform consultation, to do so significantly increases project risks.

The Court's decision emphasized that determining whether funding is appropriate in each case is a fact-driven analysis. The reasonableness of the Crown's approach will depend on the entire context.

Footnotes

1 Saugeen First Nation v Ontario, 2017 ONSC 3456.

2 Saugeen First Nation v Ontario at para 80.

3 Saugeen First Nation v Ontario at para 49.

4 Saugeen First Nation v Ontario at para 6.

5 Saugeen First Nation v Ontario at para 123.

6 Saugeen First Nation v Ontario at para 125.

7 Saugeen First Nation v Ontario at para 159.

8 Saugeen First Nation v Ontario at para 127.

9 Saugeen First Nation v Ontario at para 20.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions