Canada: Federal Court Of Appeal Gives Teeth To CITT Procurement Review Process

Last Updated: February 6 2008

Article by Cliff Sosnow, Elysia Van Zeyl & Chad Matheson, © 2008, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Blakes Bulletin on International Trade - February 2008.

On October 26, 2007, the Federal Court of Appeal issued a decision that solidifies the ability of foreign companies to initiate procurement complaints under the Agreement on Internal Trade (AIT), an agreement between the Canadian federal government and the provinces intended to regulate trade.

Furthermore, the decision will require government institutions to adhere to "recommendations" of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT). The court held that a government institution cannot refuse to implement the recommendations of a Tribunal merely because a judicial review application is pending.

Non-Canadian Companies Can Complain About Procurements

On April 17, 2007, Northrop Grumman Overseas Services Corporation (Northrop) filed a complaint with the CITT concerning a procurement by Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC). The procurement was for a supply of 36 advanced multi-role infrared sensor targeting pods and 13 years of in-service support for the pods. In the complaint, Northrop alleged that the evaluation of the bids was not completed in accordance with criteria of PWGSC's published evaluation plan. In particular, Northrop argued that certain criteria were evaluated incorrectly.

At the outset of the CITT's review, the PWGSC contended that Northrop, an American company, did not have standing to make a complaint under section 30.11 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act (CITT Act). The PWGSC argued that only Canadian businesses had standing to bring a complaint in front of the CITT with respect to the procurement provisions in the AIT. This line of argument was consistent with the CITT's decisions in Re Complaint Filed by EFJohnson (April 26, 2006) PR-2006-006 and Re Complaint Filed by Europe Displays, Inc. (January 16, 2007) PR-2006-039.

In its decision, the Tribunal examined the three conditions required for an inquiry under section 7(1) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Procurement Inquiry Regulations (CITT PIR). Firstly, the complainant must be a "potential supplier". On this point, the CITT found that Northrop fell within the definition of a "potential supplier" because neither the CITT Act nor the CITT PIR contain any specific requirements as to the nationality of a potential supplier. Secondly, the complaint by the potential supplier must relate to a designated contract. The Tribunal found that Northrop met the second condition because the contract – for the supply of aircraft to the federal government – was of the type designated under the AIT. The final requirement is for the information provided by the complainant to disclose a reasonable indication that the procurement has not been conducted in accordance with the requirements set out in the trade agreement covering the contract. The Tribunal found that the complaint did, in fact, disclose a reasonable indication that the procurement had not been conducted in accordance with the AIT. Having met these three requirements, the Tribunal found that Northrop had standing to bring a complaint under the AIT. The Tribunal, departing from its previous decisions, ruled that there was nothing in the wording, context, object or purpose of the legislative scheme of the AIT to indicate that Parties intended to limit the application of the dispute settlement mechanism to Canadian suppliers. Therefore, unlike previous decisions, the Tribunal ruled that non-Canadian parties do, in fact, have standing to bring complaints to the CITT.

PWGSC Refuses to Re-evaluate Bids

After deciding that Northrop did have standing, the Tribunal turned its attention to the main complaint that the bids were not evaluated by the PWGSC in accordance with the published evaluation plan. Northrop argued that the PWGSC incorrectly evaluated certain criteria in the procurement process. After examining the criteria of the procurement process, the Tribunal ruled that the PWGSC incorrectly evaluated the bids. In particular, the PWGSC failed to clearly identify requirements of the procurement process as required by the AIT. Since these errors may have led the PWGSC to award the contract to a bidder without the highest score, the Tribunal ordered the PWGSC to re-evaluate the proposals applying the criteria of the procurement process correctly, and award the contract to the winning bidder from this new evaluation.

Following the decision, the PWGSC advised the CITT that it did not intend to implement the CITT's recommendations. In support of this course of action, the PWGSC relied on section 30.18 of the CITT Act and section 13 of the CITT PIR which stipulate that where the CITT makes procurement recommendations to a government institution, the government institution "shall ... implement the recommendations to the greatest extent possible". Subsection 30.18(2) obligates the government entity to advise the Tribunal as to the extent that the government entity intends to implement the recommendations and, if it does not intend to implement them fully, the reasons for not doing so. Section 13 of the CITT PIR sets out the timelines for the government institution to implement the CITT's recommendations and to advise the CITT of any non-implementation. The PWGSC's sole reason for refusing to implement the recommendations was that it disagreed with the recommendations and was seeking judicial review of the Tribunal's decision. In the meantime, the PWGSC insisted on carrying out a contract with Lockheed Martin, the winning bidder from the original procurement.

In reaction to this refusal, on October 26, 2007, Northrop brought a motion in the Federal Court of Appeal seeking:

  • an order directing PWGSC to give effect to the recommendations made by the CITT in support of its decision to revaluate bids in a procurement process
  • an order declaring that PWGSC's application for judicial review does not stay the CITT's decision and, alternatively,
  • an interim stay of the performance of the contract awarded to Lockheed Martin from the procurement process.

The Attorney General, on behalf of PWGSC, argued that the relief sought by Northrop was not in the nature of interim relief but was, in fact, final relief. Final relief may not be sought in the Federal Court of Appeal because subsection 28(1) of the Federal Court Act (FCA) does not list PWGSC as a body over which the Federal Court of Appeal has jurisdiction.

If the Federal Court of Appeal does not have jurisdiction, the application could only be heard by the Federal Court. Noël, J.A., however, found that the remedies sought by Northrop were within the ambit of section 18.2 and subsection 28(2) of the FCA. These subsections of the FCA provide the Federal Court of Appeal with the authority to make orders it considers appropriate pending final disposition of an application for judicial review. Since the remedies sought by Northrop were in the nature of interim relief, it was decided that the Federal Court of Appeal could hear Northrop's motion.

PWGSC Cannot Ignore CITT Recommendations

The Attorney General, relying on sections 30.15 and 30.18(2) of the CITT Act as well as section 13 of the CITT PIR, argued that the power of the CITT to uphold a complaint is limited to making recommendations which the PWGSC is not required to implement while an application for judicial review is pending. The Court, however, ruled that the subsections did not give the PWGSC authority to "ignore" recommendations of the CITT merely because the PWGSC disagreed with it and sought judicial review.

The Court relied on the reasoning of Linden J.A. in Canada (Attorney General) v. Symtron Systems Inc., [1999] 2 F.C. 514, a case in which the scope and purpose of section 30.18 were examined. In Symtron, although the Court recognized that section 30.18 seems to provide the government institution with discretion regarding compliance with the CITT's recommendation, the intention of Parliament and the plain language of the section indicate otherwise. Accordingly, the Court held that non-compliance with the CITT's recommendations should be an "awkward and unusual occurrence". Applying this jurisprudence to the case at hand, Noël J.A. ruled that disagreement with the recommendations did not fall within the ambit of those provisions.Therefore, the PWGSC could not ignore the recommendations of the CITT.

Impact of the Decision

The implications of this decision are clear. This decision confirms that foreign companies are entitled to complain to the CITT about procurements that have not been conducted in accordance with the provisions of the AIT. Furthermore, government entities that are bound to com-ply with the AIT, and other such agreements that impart procurement obligations, are also bound to comply with the procurement recommendations of the CITT, even when a recommendation is undergoing judicial review. Moreover, a government institution that refuses to follow a CITT recommendation will need, in addition to its application for judicial review, a compelling reason for this refusal. This decision seeks to provide more teeth to the procurement review process by the CITT. No longer is a "recommendation" simply that.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
30 Oct 2019, Other, Toronto, Canada

The materials on the Blakes Business Class website are provided for informational purposes only. Accessing this information does not create a lawyer-client relationship.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions