Canada:
Insurance Corporation Of British Columbia v. Stainton Ventures Ltd., 2014 BCCA 296
15 September 2014
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Counsel Karen F. MacDonald contributed "Counsel
Comments" featured in the August 2014 issue of Take Five,
British Columbia Edition. Karen's comments address the
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v. Stainton Ventures
Ltd., 2014 BCCA 296 case.
Read the article from Take Five here.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from Canada
Copyright: 2023 Year In Review
Cassels
Join the Cassels Copyright team as we look back at some of the most notable Canadian copyright law decisions, legislative amendments, and other developments from 2023.
Intellectual Property 101
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
For many startups and scaleups, intellectual property (IP) is crucial to the company's competitive advantage and, therefore, its overall success and value.