Canada: Mounting Opposition By Municipalities, Aboriginal Communities And Environmentalists Threatens To Halt Pipeline Development

Last Updated: May 9 2014
Article by Julie Abouchar

Five major oil pipeline construction and/or expansion projects in various stages of development across Canada would, if completed, collectively carry up to 3.7 billion barrels of Western crude oil a day to refineries in Eastern Canada or on to markets in the US, Europe and Asia. With a total price tag of more than $26.7 billion, these initiatives could kick-start the Canadian economy, create tens of thousands of jobs and provide secure markets for a major expansion of oilsands production. They would also significantly boost Canada's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, cut across sensitive natural areas from one end of the country to the other, and increase the risk of a major rupture or marine spill that could have devastating long-term consequences. The pipeline projects also face concerted opposition and increasing legal challenges from First Nations, municipalities, landowners and environmental groups. Willms & Shier has acted and is acting as counsel to Interveners in a number of pipeline hearings.

Canada's Major Oil Pipeline Projects

Energy East Pipeline Project (TransCanada)

  • Description – This project would run 4,600 km east from Hardisty, Alberta to new marine terminals in Cacouna, Quebec and St. John, New Brunswick. It would also serve refineries in Quebec and New Brunswick. Some 3,000 km of existing gas pipeline would be converted and 1,500 km of new pipeline built, as well as four new tank farms, 72 pump stations, lateral connections and delivery facilities.
  • Capacity – 1.1 million barrels per day (b/d) of oil.
  • Cost – $12 billion.
  • Current Status – The company is expected to submit its application to the National Energy Board (NEB) in the third quarter of 2014. After ensuring the application is complete, the NEB will issue a Hearing Order that sets out the review schedule.

Northern Gateway Project (Enbridge)

  • Description – This project consists of two parallel pipelines (one carrying oil products west and the other condensate east) that would run 1,177 km from Bruderheim, Alberta across central British Columbia to a new Kitimat Marine Terminal (consisting of two tanker berths, three condensate tanks and 16 oil storage tanks).
  • Capacity – 525,000 b/d of petroleum products 193,000 b/d of condensate.
  • Cost – $7.88 billion.
  • Current Status – On December 19, 2013, the Joint Review Panel recommended the federal government approve the project (subject to 209 conditions). The Government has 180 days (until mid-June 2014) to issue its decision.

Eastern Canadian Refinery Access Initiative (Line 9 Project) (Enbridge)

  • Description – The first phase of this project covers the flow reversal of Line 9A, running 246 km from Sarnia to Westover, Ontario. The second phase covers the reversal of Line 9B and the expansion of Line 9, running 639 km from Westover to Montreal, Quebec.
  • Capacity – Expanded from 240,000 to 300,000 b/d of oil.
  • Cost – $15.9 million (Phase 1); $110 million (Phase 2).
  • Current Status – The NEB approved the first phase, with 15 conditions, on July 27, 2012. The NEB approved the second phase, with 30 conditions, on March 6, 2014.

Keystone XL Pipeline Project (TransCanada)

  • Description – The Canadian portion of this project involves 529 km of new pipeline from Hardisty, Alberta to the Canada/US border at Monchy, Saskatchewan. The project involves pump stations, tanks and other related facilities. The U.S. portion includes some 2,700 km of new pipeline ending in oil storage terminal facilities on the Gulf Coast in Nederland and Houston, Texas.
  • Capacity – 700,000 -900,000 b/d of oil
  • Cost – $1.7 billion (Canadian portion), $7 billion (total)
  • Current Status – The NEB approved the Canadian portion and the proposed tolls for the pipeline on March 11, 2010, with 22 conditions. U.S. approval is still pending.

Trans Mountain Expansion Project (Kinder Morgan)

  • Description – This project consists of some 987 km of new pipeline and 193 km of reactivated pipeline that would run between Edmonton, Alberta and Burnaby, British Columbia. The project also includes new and modified pump stations and tanks, and expansion of the Westridge Marine Terminal.
  • Capacity – Expanded to 890,000 b/d
  • Cost – $5 billion
  • Current Status – The NEB will hear Aboriginal traditional ecological knowledge and land use evidence this summer. Full hearings will begin in January 2015. A final recommendation is due by July 2, 2015.

Opposition and Legal Challenges

First Nations, environmentalists, landowners and municipalities along proposed pipeline routes have commenced concerted opposition and legal challenges to the projects. Very recently we have seen

  • a major protest against a pipeline project in southern BC
  • a plebiscite opposing development of a marine terminal to export Alberta crude to Asia
  • (another) municipal motion calling on Ontario to formally assess a proposed pipeline running through the province
  • (another) First Nations lawsuit calling for meaningful consultation on the impact of pipeline construction on Aboriginal and Treaty rights and
  • the release of two major reports linking oil and gas development with climate change.
  • at least 10 legal challenges to the Northern Gateway Panel review report.

Key Issues

NEB will not address upstream environmental issues

Under the new federal environmental assessment process, the National Energy Board (NEB) will not address upstream environmental issues, such as an increase in GHG emissions, in its review of pipeline applications.

On April 10, Environment Canada quietly released its National Inventory Report 1990-2012 of GHG "sources and sinks". The Report reveals that emissions from Canada's oil and gas sector have jumped by 70 per cent since 1990, taking the top spot on the list of domestic sources.

Just two days later, a working group of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change with considerably more fanfare. To limit the increase in global mean temperature to 2°C, the IPCC concludes that GHG emissions will need to be cut 40 to 70 per cent cut by 2050 and to "near zero" by the end of the century.

Ottawa will find meeting this target difficult. The environmental and socio-economic effects of upstream oil extraction activities (especially GHG emissions from oilsands development) and downstream use of oil transported by the pipeline lie outside the NEB's mandate in reviewing major pipeline proposals. Environmentalists claim that, by providing greater access to world markets, the proposed oil pipelines will accommodate a major expansion of oilsands development and significantly increasing domestic GHG emissions. Proponents counter that shipping oil by rail generates even higher GHG emissions. The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers maintains that about 75 per cent of oil-related GHG emissions comes from vehicle use, not exploration and development.1This procedural disconnect may be crystallizing opposition to pipeline construction and expansion, both at home and in the U.S.

First Nation and Métis demand for meaningful consultation may delay/halt development

On April 8, Chippewas of the Thames First Nation, located about 20 km southwest of London, Ontario, filed for leave to appeal the NEB's recent approval of Enbridge's Line 9 pipeline project. The First Nation claims that the Crown had failed to conduct any meaningful consultation on the potential impacts of the project or accommodate potentially impacted Aboriginal and Treaty rights. The First Nation says they viewed the NEB process as an opportunity to express concerns about the project impacts and have the government consult and accommodate those concerns, but were disappointed with the government's failure to engage.

We previously wrote that a number of First Nations are pursuing legal challenges to try to postpone approval of the Northern Gateway pipeline (see "First Nations and Environmental Groups Apply to Reopen Northern Gateway Project Environmental Joint Review Panel"). These First Nations allege that the Crown could not rely on the Joint Review Panel process to satisfy its duty to consult. Meaningful consultation with each affected Aboriginal community along the route of a proposed pipeline must take place. Many Aboriginal communities are also interested in a business role in any resource development projects undertaken in their territories. First Nations are pushing for equity partnerships and business opportunities that provide ongoing economic benefits.

Emerging provincial involvement on pipeline assessment and approval

While there is overlap in the federal and provincial oversight of resource extraction, the assessment and approval of pipelines has remained, primarily, a federal responsibility. However, that may be changing.

The NEB plays a central role in the assessment of these projects. Under the National Energy Board Act, the NEB must conduct a public hearing for any project involving more than 40 km of pipeline. Also, federal requirements cover the impacts on species at risk under the Endangered Species Act, impacts on fisheries under the Fisheries Act, and approvals for river crossings under the Navigable Waters Act. There are also federal requirements for Aboriginal consultations, and permits for disposal at sea, explosives use and transport.

Proponents must negotiate a series of provincial and municipal approval processes and regulatory requirements. For example, the Energy East project must obtain authorizations under more than 50 statutes scattered across six provinces from Alberta to New Brunswick. These cover archaeological research, habitat and wetland protection, work on Crown lands, heritage properties, oversized load transport, crossing public utilities and more. Finally, the regional, municipal and other local government approvals needed may include electrical permits, access road permits, permission to cross county and regional district roads, water use, and health approval for industrial camps.

TransCanada expects the Energy East project will also be subject to a public EA hearing by the Bureau d'audiences publique sur l'environnement (BAPE) under Quebec's Environmental Quality Act, as well as a formal review process to consider the use and the acquisition of rights to agricultural land by the Commission de protection du territoire agricole (CPTAQ).

In Ontario, the Minister of Energy asked the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) to prepare a report on the impacts of the Energy East proposal, including its effect on natural gas rates and access to supply, the natural environment and pipeline safety, local and Aboriginal communities, and the short and long-term economy. On April 8, the OEB wrapped up public hearings and is currently preparing its final report, expected sometime this summer. While several intervenors before the OEB supported the project's job creation potential, others insisted local communities should reap financial benefits to compensate for the risk of future spills, and many said the pipeline should be rejected outright on environmental grounds. Although the OEB has no jurisdiction over the project's final approval, its report will form the basis of the province's intervention in the upcoming NEB review.

Some are asking the province to take a more active role. On April 1, Toronto City Council passed a motion asking the Ontario Ministry of the Environment to undertake a comprehensive environmental assessment of Enbridge's Line 9 application. Toronto joins Kingston and several other municipalities along the Line 9 route to call for a provincial EA on the project. Toronto has also asked Enbridge to give notice when it plans to bring in an emergency response team to handle potential oil spills, as well as to inform the city of any maintenance work or testing it plans to do on Line 9 near GO Transit and TTC facilities over the next five years.

With hundreds of municipalities and Aboriginal communities spread along the routes of the major pipelines under development, the proponents are going to have to work hard to address the safety and emergency response issues that are being raised.

Fewer groups/individuals to address hearing panels

The NEB limits intervenors to those parties "directly affected" by a proposed project or having "relevant information" to contribute. As a result, hundreds of groups and individuals may be denied an opportunity to address the hearing panels considering upcoming pipeline projects.

On April 12, hundreds of Burnaby, B.C. residents rallied against the expansion of Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain pipeline across south-central BC, citing concerns about increased oil tanker traffic, the size of the tank farm on Burnaby Mountain, climate change, and effects on health and safety. The same day, residents of Kitimat, B.C., the terminus of the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline, registered their opposition to that controversial project by a vote of 58.4 to 41.6 per cent in a non-binding municipal plebiscite. Grass roots opposition to pipeline proposals has not dissipated following the conclusion of the Northern Gateway hearings.

Under section 55.2 of the National Energy Board Act, in assessing an application, the NEB must consider the representations of any person who, in its opinion, is "directly affected," as well as any person who, again in its opinion, has "relevant information or expertise" to contribute. The NEB's decision on whether to consider the representations of any person is "conclusive". If accepted by the NEB, such individuals may participate in a hearing as an intervenor (who can file evidence and notices of motion, ask written questions, and present written and oral arguments) or as a commenter (who may submit one letter of content).

The NEB does not want to replicate the inclusive approach taken by the Joint Hearing Panel that reviewed the Northern Gateway application under the old EA rules. That panel heard oral testimony from 1,179 individuals, groups and community leaders over 180 hearing days. On April 2, the NEB issued a list of some 400 acceptable intervenors (and 1,250 commenters) for the upcoming hearing into expanding the Trans Mountain pipeline from a pool of over 2,100 applicants that had formally applied to take part. It is uncertain whether limiting the number of intervenors in the interest of procedural efficacy will harden opposition and trigger more intrusive protests in future.


We are carefully monitoring developments in this area.

Despite a supportive federal regulatory environment, including a streamlined environmental assessment process, the organized opposition to major pipeline proposals continues to grow. To ensure the support of municipalities, First Nations communities and landowners along the proposed routes, proponents will have to undertake meaningful consultation, address environmental concerns and upgrade pipeline integrity safeguards.

We will update you on significant developments in these areas.


1. See

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions