ARTICLE
16 April 2013

Modernization Of Investment Fund Product Regulation

GW
Gowling WLG

Contributor

Gowling WLG is an international law firm built on the belief that the best way to serve clients is to be in tune with their world, aligned with their opportunity and ambitious for their success. Our 1,400+ legal professionals and support teams apply in-depth sector expertise to understand and support our clients’ businesses.
On March 27, 2013 the Canadian Securities Administrators published for comment proposed amendments to National Instrument 81-102 – Mutual Funds, proposed changes to Companion Policy 81-102CP, and related consequential amendments, as part of the CSA’s Modernization of Investment Fund Product Regulation Project.
Canada Finance and Banking
Gowling WLG are most popular:
  • within Compliance and Wealth Management topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel
  • with readers working within the Consumer Industries and Technology industries

On March 27, 2013 the Canadian Securities Administrators (the "CSA") published for comment proposed amendments to National Instrument 81-102 – Mutual Funds ("NI 81-102"), proposed changes to Companion Policy 81-102CP, and related consequential amendments, as part of the CSA's Modernization of Investment Fund Product Regulation Project. The comment period closes on June 25, 2013.

The stated objective of the proposed changes is to create a more consistent regulatory framework for comparable investment products and to give investors access to alternative investment strategies. The changes would introduce new requirements for non-redeemable investment funds that are reporting issuers. The proposed requirements are analogous to requirements that apply to mutual funds under NI 81-102. Proposed amendments to National Instrument 81-104 Commodity Pools are intended to create a more comprehensive "alternative fund" framework.

One of the CSA's specific requests for comment is whether it should reconsider its present view that investment funds offering redemptions based on net asset value no more than once a year are non-redeemable investment funds. The CSA has indicated that the alternative is to consider an investment fund to be a mutual fund if it offers any redemptions based on net asset value. The CSA's present view has provided some clarity to industry participants in interpreting the term "mutual fund" as defined in securities legislation. The proposed alternative could result in some pooled funds (that are not currently considered "mutual funds") being caught by certain investment restrictions that apply in some jurisdictions to "mutual funds" organized under the laws of such jurisdictions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More