A jury ruling in Apple's favour over Samsung in the United States District Court1 could have a chilling effect on rivals, and leave them scrambling for alternatives to common touch-screen gestures used in consumer electronic devices. The jury found Samsung violated six Apple patents. In particular, three of these patents cover common touch-screen effects:

  • US Patent 7,469,381 covers the bounce-back effect when a user tries to scroll beyond the end of a list or image.
  • US Patent 7,844,915 covers the pinch-to-zoom and one-fingered scrolling gesture effects.
  • US Patent 7,864,163 covers the tap-to-zoom and centre gesture effects.

The awarded $1.05 billion has had a chilling effect on Samsung's stock price, and may significantly limit its access to the US marketplace. While Samsung will appeal, Apple has indicated that it will seek an injunction against Samsung to further limit Samsung's ability to maintain its market share.

Interestingly, the corresponding Canadian patent to Patent 7,469,381 issued just a few weeks ago and the corresponding Canadian patent to US Patent 7,864,163 is still pending. However there is no corresponding application in Canada for US Patent 7,844,915. It is possible that Apple will try to leverage the US decision to enforce its patents in Canada and elsewhere. While Apple does not have patent coverage in Canada for some inventions protected in the US, the nature of the global consumer electronics market will make it difficult for competitors to take advantage of this without access to the potential revenue provided by the US marketplace.

Samsung will not suffer alone. All software designers are now faced with the challenge of developing alternatives to these common touch-screen gestures. However it is reported that Samsung has already created design-arounds for some of the patented features. However delays and awkward fixes may be expected in the near future from competitors, as they scramble to create software workarounds. This ruling could hamper smartphone innovation because it is difficult to envision how a non-Apple smartphone can be competitive without using these now-common and intuitive touch-screen effects. Some in the media have argued that the decision will actually accelerate innovation as designers are forced to explore new solutions. Time will tell.

Footnotes

1 Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al., No. 11-1846

Norton Rose Group

Norton Rose Group is a leading international legal practice. We offer a full business law service to many of the world's pre-eminent financial institutions and corporations from offices in Europe, Asia, Australia, Canada, Africa, the Middle East, Latin America and Central Asia.

Knowing how our clients' businesses work and understanding what drives their industries is fundamental to us. Our lawyers share industry knowledge and sector expertise across borders, enabling us to support our clients anywhere in the world. We are strong in financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and pharmaceuticals and life sciences.

We have more than 2900 lawyers operating from 43 offices in Abu Dhabi, Almaty, Amsterdam, Athens, Bahrain, Bangkok, Beijing, Bogotá, Brisbane, Brussels, Calgary, Canberra, Cape Town, Caracas, Casablanca, Dubai, Durban, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hong Kong, Johannesburg, London, Melbourne, Milan, Montréal, Moscow, Munich, Ottawa, Paris, Perth, Piraeus, Prague, Québec, Rome, Shanghai, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto and Warsaw; and from associate offices in Dar es Salaam, Ho Chi Minh City and Jakarta.

Norton Rose Group comprises Norton Rose LLP, Norton Rose Australia, Norton Rose Canada LLP, Norton Rose South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc), and their respective affiliates.

On January 1, 2012, Macleod Dixon joined Norton Rose Group adding strength and depth in Canada, Latin America and around the world. For more information please visit nortonrose.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.