We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
On July 27, the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
of Canada (IIROC) released proposed guidance respecting
the marketplace disclosure language it would deem
acceptable for trade confirmations. The guidance follows its April 2010 proposal,
expected to be approved by securities regulators on or before
October 15, 2012, that would require trade confirmations to
disclose the marketplace on which a trade was executed or other
marketplace language acceptable to IIROC.
Assuming approval of the proposed amendments, IIROC would
deem the following disclosure language acceptable where an order
was executed on a single marketplace in Canada, multiple
marketplaces in Canada, a foreign organized regulated market
(including one in the U.S.), or any combination of one or more
marketplace and foreign organized regulated markets:
"Traded on one or more
marketplaces or markets, details available upon request."
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
An insider trading decision of the Alberta Securities Commission (the "Commission") released on April 10, 2013, provides a thoughtful and practical approach by a securities commission to its assessment of what constitutes a "material fact".
This article touches on some of the key types of businesses and explains what a might be the typical role of a lawyer in providing advice or assistance to you in setting up your business or in having others join you in your business.
In the decision MDV Representations v. Corporation Xprima.com, the Superior Court highlights the importance of drafting termination clauses in a service contract using clear and simple language.
The Alberta Court of Appeal has recently released a decision that adds much needed clarity to when an officer or director of a corporation will be personally liable for torts committed by a corporation.
A discussion on a recent case, which provides a cautionary tale on the dangers of entering into a share purchase agreement and subsequently closing a share purchase transaction, without ample due diligence.
In our last post, we outlined some of the reasons why corporate spin-offs are used. In this post, we address some of the most common methods used to implement the corporate spin-off.
Insider Trading And Crisis Management (CBB Corporate Counsel Insights Video Series) 
