Contributor Page
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
 
Email  |  Website  |  Articles
Contact Details
Tel: +1 202 4084000
Fax: +1 202 4084400
901 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC
20001-4413
United States
By Kate Leonard, Kara Specht
In University of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. v. General Electric Company, No. 18-1284 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 26, 2019),
By Trenton Ward, Mark Feldstein, Stacey D. Lewis, Thomas Irving
In SAS Institute, Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S.Ct. 1348 (2018), the Supreme Court held that a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision on institution of an inter partes review (IPR)
By Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The USPTO website contains training materials on subject matter eligibility; here is the link.
By Jeffrey Berkowitz
Michael Rubin, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal (IPLJ) staff member, sits down with Finnegan partner Jeffrey Berkowitz to discuss experiences encountered
By Nicholas Camillo, Margaret Esquenet
The Supreme Court reversed a $12.8 million award to Oracle USA, Inc. ("Oracle"), finding that the phrase "full costs" in section 505 of the Copyright Act encompasses ...
By Samuel V. Eichner, Margaret Esquenet
The U.S. Supreme Court rendered a unanimous decision in an opinion penned by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg regarding whether 17 U.S.C. § 411's requirement ...
By Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
On October 29, 1982, former Judge Helen W. Nies wrote the opinion for Sanyo Watch Co., Inc. v. Sanyo Elec. Co., Ltd. 691 F.2d 1019 (Fed. Cir. 1982).
By Mareesa Frederick, Michele Bosch, Stacey D. Lewis, Thomas Irving
Brigham's U.S. Patent No. 5,229,137 ('137 patent) (now expired) claimed a method for treating episodic heartburn, in particular, by co-administering an antacid and H2-blocker to achieve a certain clinical result.
By Ryan McDonnell, Caitlin E. O'Connell
In this appeal, the Federal Circuit has been asked to consider the constitutionality of IPR's when applied to patents that issued after enactment, but before the effective date ...
By Adriana Burgy, Thomas Irving
From 35,000 feet, a series of Federal Circuit and PTAB decisions written about in this blog may show favorable times of which patent owners should take note and try to leverage as much as possible.
By Doris Johnson Hines, Ming-Tao Yang
Technical standards that ensure device interconnectivity and interoperability cover myriad products in the information and computer technology (ICT) space, from smartphones and tablets, to memory devices and cables.
By Kate Leonard, M. Andrew Holtman
In Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., No. 17-1694 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 7, 2019), the CAFC dismissed Momenta's appeal from a final written decision of the PTAB for lack of standing.
By Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The USPTO offers training to the public on various topics directed to examination practice and procedure based on training to USPTO examiners.
By C. Collette Corser, Drew Christie, Mark Feldstein
In Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Research Corporation Technologies, Inc., the CAFC held that appellants, who had joined the IPR proceeding below under 35 U.S.C. § 315, had standing to appeal but affirmed that ...
By Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Know the standard of review, and clearly state it in the brief; then apply it.
Contributor's Topics
More...