Contributor Page
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
Email  |  Website  |  Articles
Contact Details
Tel: +1 703 413 3000
Fax: +1 703 413 2220
1940 Duke Street
VA 22314
United States
By Brian Darville
The Ninth Circuit determined that defendants met their initial burden of demonstrating that the greeting cards are expressive works protected under the First Amendment.
By J. Derek Mason
Wash. U. ultimately had to litigate for 5 years, starting the litigation 18 years after the IIA was executed, in order to gain the benefit of their agreement with WARF.
By W. Todd Baker, Lisa M. Mandrusiak
JTEKT's petition for certiorari frames the issue as whether Congress conferred standing to IPR petitioners through the IPR statutory scheme.
By Marc K. Weinstein
The Board agreed with petitioner LG and denied patent owner Wi-Lan's motion to dismiss.
By Michael R. Casey
On Nov. 16, 2018, the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the PTAB finding that Petitioners had not shown that any of ZitoVault's claims were unpatentable.
By Sameer Gokhale
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a loaded technology buzzword that comes in different forms in various commercial products.
By Marina I. Miller
The Board next considered whether there was a motivation to modify Pinchasi's 40mg every other day regimen.
By Lisa M. Mandrusiak
Post grant reviews (PGRs) have proven to be more popular in the biotechnology space (TC 1600) than any other art unit, with 42—or 28.1%—of the PGRs filed to date classified as TC 1600 patents.
By Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
Effective Dec. 1, the WIPO DAS will manage electronic retrievals of priority documents between the USPTO and the KIPO, in accordance with the WIPO DAS agreement established on April 20, 2009.
By James Love
The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) is a hot topic in the world of medical devices. This summer, at the MedTech conference in Philadelphia, IoMT was the word on everyone's lips.
By J. Derek Mason
In a November 9, 2018 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the doctrine of assignor estoppel does not apply in the inter partes review (IPR) context ...
By Vincent K. Shier
On Friday, November 2, 2018, the USPTO released its interim procedure for patentees to request recalculation of the patent term adjustment with respect to information disclosure statements accompanied by ...
By Alexander B. Englehart, Michael D. West
On October 26, 2018, the International Trade Commission issued the public version of its opinion (part 1 and part 2) in Certain Non-Volatile Memory Devices and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-1046).
By Eric Schweibenz, Alexander B. Englehart
On November 5, 2018, ALJ Clark S. Cheney issued Order No. 3 in Certain Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment Mask Systems and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-1136).
By Lisa M. Mandrusiak
The IPR estoppel provision was originally intended as a check against patent challengers attacking patents serially in the USPTO or other forums based on grounds that were raised or "reasonably could have been raised" in the original IPR.