Australia: Outcome-based contracting is on the up: Who's doing it, why, and what you need to know about it

"The customer really doesn't want a drilling machine, he wants a hole in the wall"1

As government agencies and businesses across all industries come under increasing pressure to deliver more value within constrained budgets, organisations are looking to an outcome based contracting model for a solution.

Outcome based contracts, where customers pay for pre-agreed 'outcomes' rather than for prescribed products and services, are not new, but are gaining increasing attention. A saving of a trillion dollars in the United States over the next decade has been forecast for the successful rollout of an outcome based payment model in government healthcare spending.2 The World Bank, as part of a two year review of its procurement framework, has highlighted outcome based contracting as a key area of focus for enhancing procurement efficiency.

The model has been adopted as a preferred procurement strategy internationally for many years in the public sector. So what has been holding it back from more mainstream adoption, particularly in the private sector? We examine some of the key challenges that both customers and service providers face in drafting and negotiating an outcome based contract and identify ways of managing them.

What is outcome-based procurement and how is it different to more conventional contracting models?

Under an outcome based approach, a customer contracts and pays for business results delivered by a service provider, rather than for defined activities, tasks or assets. The contract focuses on the desired outcome of the work to be performed (the "what") rather than the manner in which it is to be performed (the "how"). The service provider decides how it will deliver on the customer requirements – and thus a degree of both control and risk shift to the service provider.

Rolls Royce 'Power by the Hour®' is one of the oldest and best known examples of an outcome based business model. Over 20 years ago, Rolls Royce transformed its support and maintenance contracting model for engines used in commercial jets. Instead of charging customers for repairs, maintenance and the provision of spare parts, customers paid a fee per hour based on the number of hours of flying time for an engine. The company recognised that by focusing the contractual arrangement on the real underlying need of the customer – keeping a jet in the air – it could deliver greater satisfaction to the customer whilst at the same time reduce inefficiencies and increase its own revenue. This contractual structure has since become the industry standard in commercial aviation.

Key characteristics

There are some variations to the basic outcome based procurement model, but all outcome based contracts will typically have the following three fundamental characteristics:

  1. A focus on business outcomes rather than activities and tasks.
  2. The use of measurable performance standards that are tied to the required outcomes.
  3. A pricing model that comprises or includes rewards and risks.

These key elements of an outcome based contract are inter-related – outcomes need to be translated into measurable performance standards – and delivery against the performance standards is used to determine the amount of fees paid. They are also usually the same elements that present parties with the most difficulties in successfully negotiating and documenting an outcome based contract.

Users of outcome based contracting

Government agencies have been the biggest users of outcome based contracts to date. They are used in a wide range of public programs and services, including defence and aerospace contracting, health services, logistics, maintenance of transport infrastructure and welfare, employment and skills programs.

The outcome based procurement model was pioneered in the U.S. as far back as the 1960s, but use of the model worldwide is increasing. A number of government agencies now formally endorse, or even mandate, this form of contracting.

In Australia, almost every State and territory has been trialling, adopting and promoting outcome based contracting to varying degrees for a number of years. In New South Wales, the State Government explicitly endorsed the trial of outcome based procurement in its 2013/2014 roadmap for procurement reform.

That said, one size does not fit all. An outcome based approach is not always suitable and some services, industries and organisations will be inherently better placed to obtain the full advantage of this contracting model than others. For example, in some cases an organisation's objectives may be adequately served by procuring a particular product. Hybrid contracts, where both outcomes and process specifications are set out, are often used in the public sector for large-scale projects.


Advocates of outcome based contracts point to the following benefits:

  • Cost savings
  • Supporting innovation on the part of the service provider
  • Closer alignment of objectives between the customer and the service provider
  • Increased motivation for the service provider to achieve the best outcome to maximise its financial gain
  • More responsive to customer requirements
  • Greater efficiency in service delivery, through allowing the service provider flexibility in its method of delivery and an ability to adapt to technological advancements
  • Better outcomes for customers.

Challenges for 'outcomes based' contracting

Despite the many advantages seen by both customers and service providers who are parties to successful outcome based contracting arrangements, this contracting model is still not standard practice. Below are some of the key challenges that organisations face – and need to understand – in successfully implementing an outcome based strategy.

  1. Defining the desired outcomes

Unlike more conventional contracting models, outcome based contracts do not set out detailed technical or operational specifications of the individual activities and tasks that a service provider is to perform, the resources used in those activities and the precise way in which the service will be delivered. It articulates requirements in the form of end goals – business outcomes – without specifying exactly how these are to be achieved.

For example, a buildings maintenance contract might specify that floors must be clean, free of scuff marks and dirt, and have a uniformly glossy finish, instead of specifying that the contractor must strip and rewax the floors weekly. Or a company looking for transport services for its personnel may require that a vehicle is ready for use, or a person is picked up, within a certain number of minutes of an agreed time, rather than the company requiring a set number of vehicles to be leased or made available.

This is a significant shift in mindset for many of those involved in the procurement process, particularly as many have an engineering or technical background, where the natural tendency can be to default to a prescriptive approach and rely on detailed process specifications in order to reduce risk.

A balance needs to be struck between defining the outcomes required in sufficient detail to ensure the customer's requirements are understood and capable of being measured, and not unduly constraining the service provider. If the service provider's flexibility and discretion in how those outcomes are delivered is limited, the benefit of outcome based contracting is significantly reduced. However, the autonomy given over to the service provider should not be at the cost of clearly formulated objectives – it is still crucial to ensure a high degree of specificity about the actual outcomes that will be contracted for.

Equally, the transfer of risk to the service provider must be appropriate in the context of the services in question –a service provider will resist taking on the customer's business risks, as these will be beyond its control.

  1. Measuring performance

Sound performance measures are critical to ensuring a successful outcome based procurement arrangement. At its simplest, the contracted "outcomes" should be objective, measurable, clear and realistic.

Both the level of required "outcome" and the related key metrics need to be considered and clearly set out. This is fundamental in an outcome based contract. If you can't measure the required "outcome", you can't manage performance, and you can't properly remunerate on the basis of performance. A lack of relevant metrics or unenforceable metrics is often cited as one of the primary pitfalls of implementing a successful outcome based contract.3

In highway maintenance contracts, for example, where use of outcome based contracting is now prevalent (including throughout Australia), performance standards would typically include:

  • specific metrics for the roughness of pavements, rutting of roads (e.g. no ruts > 15mm), surface texture and surface skid resistance, number of potholes (e.g. < 10 potholes with a diameter > 100mm on any continuous 5km stretch of road);
  • specific intervals at which these features are measured (e.g. annually) or response times; and
  • the specific sections of the road network to which the standards apply.

The process of establishing appropriate performance standards relies heavily on the data available. The more comprehensive, accurate and robust the data that the customer has – in particular, historical and supporting data about performance, costs, variable factors and barriers – the easier it will be for both parties to reach agreement on appropriate performance standards.

If sufficient data is unavailable, consider including a transition period to baseline the relevant standards before applying the incentives or risk and rewards payment model in full.

  1. Pricing

One of the fundamental underlying features of an outcome based procurement strategy is the direct relationship between performance and the payment of fees. Fees are not calculated on the basis of a transactional pricing model, but are tied to achievement of the agreed outcomes. This is the point at which the outcome based model has the most potential to be a 'win-win' scenario – the better the performance delivered to the customer, the more the service provider has to gain financially. Because the customer has not imposed prescriptive process specifications, the supplier is free to produce innovative, cost effective solutions for the benefit of both parties.

There are a number of ways in which the pricing model can be structured, each designed to drive quality performance and efficiency. Pricing options include a combination of positive and negative incentives (though the focus should be on the positive), a gainshare model, contingency arrangements and cost-plus mechanisms. Some contracts will comprise a fixed fee or lump sums, with one or more additional mechanisms under which the service provider can earn increased fees by exceeding expectations. Many will also contain a downside, where the service provider stands to lose revenue for sub-standard performance.

In each case, the emphasis is on having the right incentives in place to encourage the desired outcomes.

The Washington State Lottery, in its contract with an advertising agency, provides an example of how fees can be linked to performance. The agency originally earned 15% of the contract value for specified tasks, such as advertising services, production activities, printing and media buys. The contract structure was overhauled to be more performance based. The amount of fees paid to the agency was directly linked to the number of lottery ticket sales (i.e. linked to effective advertising, rather than to advertising activities), with a range of between 90% and 115% of the base fee.

Cultural shift

Perhaps the biggest hurdle many organisations face in moving to an outcome based model, more than the commercial, operational and legal issues and challenges that it entails, is the cultural shift in organisational thinking. Procurement personnel need to relinquish a large degree of control and the reassurance that a prescriptive approach often brings. If a service provider is to be responsible for achieving the outcomes, it must have control over the process and the method of delivering those outcomes. Often a lack of training or excessive risk aversion of procurement personnel results in organisations defaulting to the status quo.

Going forward

In the current economic climate, with organisations increasingly under pressure to extract more value from their service providers, deliver results and remain competitive through innovation, the adoption of outcome based contracting is gathering pace. As familiarity with the model grows, and the advantages that organisations stand to gain over traditional contracting models are more publicised, this trend is set to continue and all parties involved in the procurement lifecycle need to understand the issues involved.


1Levitt, 1972

2McKinsey, 'The Trillion Dollar Price – Using outcomes-based payment to address the US healthcare financing crisis', 2013

3Booz Allen Hamilton: "Performance-Based Logistics – Considerations for Commercial Participants" 2007

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Most awarded firm and Australian deal of the year
Australasian Legal Business Awards
Employer of Choice for Women
Equal Opportunity for Women
in the Workplace (EOWA)

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions