United States: Ninth Circuit Finds Article III Standing In Case Alleging Facebook Violated The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act

Last Updated: August 13 2019
Article by Amanda Fitzsimmons

Facebook's woes continued this week as the Ninth Circuit rejected the company's efforts to dismiss and/or de-certify the class in a case brought by users who alleged that Facebook violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), 740 Ill. Comp. Stat. 14/1 et seq. (2008), by unlawfully collecting and storing biometric data derived from their faces without prior notice or consent.

The Ninth Circuit is the first federal circuit court to conclude that a plaintiff alleging a BIPA violation has standing for purposes of Article III of the US Constitution, and its ruling is at odds with an unpublished decision in the Second Circuit and numerous district court opinions across the country.  The opinion continues the Ninth Circuit's trend of liberally interpreting the confines of Article III and confirms that the Ninth Circuit will continue to be a hotbed of privacy litigation for years to come.

Facebook's "tag suggestions" feature leads to litigation

In Patel v. Facebook, Case No. 18-15982 (9th Cir. Aug. 8, 2019), the plaintiffs challenged Facebook's practice of utilizing facial recognition technology to create "face templates" for purposes of analyzing whether a user's Facebook friends are in photos uploaded by that user.  If a face template matches the photo and the user has enabled Facebook's "Tag Suggestions" feature, Facebook may suggest "tagging" the person in the photo.  According to the plaintiffs, Facebook utilized this technology without user consent and without a compliant retention schedule in violation of BIPA, which prohibits the collection, use and storage of biometric identifiers, including a "scan" of "facial geometry."

In determining whether the plaintiffs had Article III standing, the Ninth Circuit applied the two-step approach it developed on remand in the Robins v. Spokeo case, which calls on the court to inquire "(1) whether the statutory provisions at issue were established to protect [the plaintiff’s] concrete interests (as opposed to purely procedural rights), and if so, (2) whether the specific procedural violations alleged in this case actually harm, or present a material risk of harm to, such interests."  867 F.3d 1108, 1113 (9th Cir. 2017).

With respect to the first step, the Ninth Circuit concluded that "the development of a face template using facial-recognition technology without consent (as alleged here) invades an individual's private affairs and concrete affairs." The court found that this notion was consistent with the legislative history of BIPA, and supported the conclusion that BIPA was not meant to protect a pure procedural right.

With respect to the second step, the Ninth Circuit concluded that the alleged violation of BIPA’s requirements would "necessarily violate the plaintiffs' substantive privacy interests," resulting in a concrete injury-in-fact sufficient to confer Article III standing.  The court noted that its decision was consistent with its prior decisions, which found standing in cases alleging violation of privacy rights under statutes that are similar in nature to BIPA, such as the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), 18 U.S.C. § 2710.

In addition to concluding that the plaintiffs had alleged sufficient injury for purposes of Article III standing, the Ninth Circuit also concluded that there were no grounds to decertify the class.  In urging decertification, Facebook argued that the Illinois extraterritoriality doctrine precluded a finding of predominance as required under Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  Specifically, Facebook contended that common questions do not predominate because each class member would need to offer individualized proof that the violation occurred "primarily and substantially within" Illinois.  The Ninth Circuit rejected the argument, concluding that this was really a threshold question of whether BIPA would apply to the plaintiff class. The court determined that this threshold question could be decided on a class-wide basis, without resort to individualized evidence. 

The Ninth Circuit also rejected Facebook's claim that "the possibility of a large, class-wide statutory damages award . . . defeats superiority." The Ninth Circuit noted that "the potential for enormous liability can justify a denial of class certification," but only if that was the legislature's intent.  The court concluded that the district court did not err in concluding there was superiority because "nothing in the text or legislative history of BIPA indicates that a large statutory damages award would be contrary to the intent of the General Assembly."


Up until a few years ago, BIPA was a relatively unknown statute. In 2016, plaintiffs filed the Patel v. Facebook case, starting a wave of cases in Illinois, California, and elsewhere (reports estimate that more than 200 BIPA cases have been filed in the last two years). The Patel v. Facebook opinion demonstrates that BIPA is a powerful weapon in the statutory arsenal of plaintiffs' lawyers, and with statutory damages of $1,000 to $5,000 per violation, poses a severe trap for the unwary.

In addition, although the Ninth Circuit's opinion in Patel was one about statutory standing, the Ninth Circuit's discussion of evolving technologies, their implication on privacy rights, and the Supreme Court's developing Fourth Amendment jurisprudence suggests that the Ninth Circuit may be willing to find Article III standing in cases involving privacy violations that are not grounded in statutes exhibiting the strong legislative history of BIPA.

Finally, while the court's rejection of Facebook's decertification arguments seems at first blush to be troubling to corporate defendants, the court's ruling appears to have been premised on the fact that the Patel case "involve[d] only plaintiffs who are located in Illinois, and the claims are based on the application of Illinois law to the use of Facebook mainly in Illinois." Defendants seeking to avoid class certification based on arguments regarding extraterritorial application of state laws may have more traction in privacy cases that seek to certify nationwide classes or classes comprised of residents of multiple states.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions