United States: SCOTUS Ruling: Whistleblowers Must "Tell The SEC" For Dodd-Frank Protection

On February 21, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers1 resolving the circuit split on whether the anti-retaliation provision of Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank") protects individuals who have not reported potential securities laws violations to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").2 In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, with concurring opinions by Justices Sotomayor and Thomas, the Supreme Court ruled that individuals must report potential securities law violations to the SEC to avail themselves of Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation provision that provides a private right of action to whistleblowers. This opinion will have far-reaching implications on how public companies and SEC-registered entities structure their compliance programs, how the SEC will incorporate this opinion into its enforcement program, and how (if at all) the SEC may attempt to address this opinion in future rulemaking.3


As we covered in our previous alert, the case involved an anti-retaliation complaint brought by an employee, Paul Somers, who was terminated by his employer, Digital Realty Trust, Inc., for internally reporting potential securities law violations. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California denied Digital Realty's motion to dismiss because the court found the statutory scheme ambiguous and deferred to the SEC's interpretation of its implementing regulation that defines whistleblowers and prohibits retaliation.4

In particular, Rule 21F-2(a)(1) defines "whistleblower" as an individual who "provide(s) the Commission with information pursuant to the procedures set forth in § 240.21F-9(a) of this chapter, and the information relates to a possible violation of the Federal securities laws (including any rules or regulations thereunder) that has occurred, is ongoing, or is about to occur."5 That provision also sets forth anti-retaliation protections for whistleblowers that "possess a reasonable belief that the information [they] are providing relates to a possible securities law violation ... that has occurred, is ongoing, or is about to occur" and (i) provide information to the SEC, (ii) assist in an SEC investigation or enforcement action, or (iii) make any legally required disclosures.6

On interlocutory appeal, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal while recognizing the existing circuit split on this issue between the Second and Fifth Circuits.7 During oral argument on November 28, 2017, the Justices signaled that they were leaning towards the more restrictive view of Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation provision by focusing on the plain language of Dodd-Frank and questioning the SEC's broad interpretation of it.8


The Supreme Court ultimately reversed the Ninth Circuit's decision and held that the more restrictive interpretation applied on several bases.

First, the Supreme Court found that Dodd-Frank included an "explicit definition" of whistleblower that it "must follow."9 Specifically, § 78u-6(a)(6) of Dodd-Frank defines "whistleblower" as "any individual who provides ... information relating to a violation of the securities laws to the Commission" and indicates that this definition applies throughout the section.10 The Supreme Court explained that, contrary to the arguments by Somers and the Solicitor General, the anti-retaliation provision does not modify this definition because that provision only "protects a whistleblower who reports misconduct both to the SEC and to another entity, but suffers retaliation because of the latter, non-SEC, disclosure."11 The Supreme Court noted that the Solicitor General's argument that requiring a dual report would gut the anti-retaliation provision was contradicted by the Solicitor General's own brief reporting that "approximately 80 percent of the whistleblowers who received awards in 2016 reported internally before reporting to the Commission."12 The Supreme Court also noted that the SEC is required to protect the identity of whistleblowers thereby minimizing the potential of retaliation.13

Second, the Supreme Court pointed to another provision of Dodd-Frank – the one providing whistleblower protection relating to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") – for support that Congress intended this definition.14 Unlike the SEC provision, the Supreme Court noted that the CFPB provision "imposes no requirement that information be conveyed to a government agency."15

Third, the Supreme Court looked beyond Dodd-Frank's explicit language to the SEC Whistleblower Program's "core objective" (as recognized in the Senate Report accompanying the bill) "to motivate people who know of securities law violations to tell the SEC."16 The Supreme Court explained that the "award program and anti-retaliation provision ... work synchronously to motivate individuals with knowledge of illegal activity to 'tell the SEC'" because Congress recognized that "[f]inancial inducements alone ... may be insufficient to encourage certain employees, fearful of employer retaliation, to come forward with evidence of wrongdoing."17

It is important to note that there was no unanimity among the Justices on this last point. While Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch concurred in part and in the judgment in a separate opinion to the extent the decision relied on the text of Dodd-Frank, Justices Sotomayor and Breyer concurred in a separate opinion to emphasize the relevance of legislative history in interpreting both ambiguous and unambiguous statutes.


By narrowly interpreting Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation provision, the Digital Realty opinion changes whistleblowers' incentives by encouraging them to report potential misconduct to the SEC instead of reporting it internally through their employers' compliance programs. Although employees who only report internally still have anti-retaliation protections under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley"), these protections are less advantageous than the ones under Dodd-Frank. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley protections require employees to exhaust administrative remedies by filing an administrative complaint with the Secretary of Labor,18 instead of filing a complaint in federal court under Dodd-Frank.19 The Sarbanes-Oxley statute of limitations is 180 days,20 which is much shorter than the Dodd-Frank six-year statute of limitations.21 Moreover, Sarbanes-Oxley awards actual backpay with interest,22 whereas Dodd-Frank awards double backpay with interest.23

In the short term, many existing Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation claims likely will be dismissed for the same reasons Somers's claims were dismissed on appeal by the Supreme Court. While there may be a period of time when tips to the SEC ebb as potential whistleblowers recalculate this new cost-benefit structure, this period likely will be short-lived. After all, the SEC's Whistleblower Program – having awarded more than $179 million to 50 whistleblowers as of the date of this alert24 – presents substantial financial incentives for employees to report potential securities laws violations. These financial incentives along with the Digital Realty opinion undercut corporate compliance programs' entreaties to report misconduct internally.

Given this, public companies and registered entities should evaluate their compliance programs, including their training modules, to ensure that they accurately reflect the Supreme Court's interpretation of Dodd-Frank and address its bounty and anti-retaliation incentives. Although the Digital Realty opinion has changed the incentive structure, a robust compliance program emphasized by senior management can still encourage internal reporting by assuaging concerns of retaliation.


1 No. 16-1276, 583 U.S. __ (2018), https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1276_b0nd.pdf.

2 583 U.S. at *2.

3 One of the proposed rules on the SEC's Regulatory Flex Agenda is "certain amendments to the Commission's existing whistleblower rules to clarify various issues that have arisen based on the Commission's experiences to date in implementing the whistleblower program that was established in July 2010." SEC Regulatory Flexibility Act Agenda (Fall 2017), https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201710&RIN=3235-AM11.

4 119 F. Supp. 3d 1088, 1095-96 (N.D. Cal. 2015).

5 17 C.F.R. § 240.21F-2(a)(1).

6 15 U.S.C. 78u-6(h)(1)(A).

7 Somers v. Digital Realty Trust Inc. et al., No. 15-17352 (9th Cir. Mar. 8, 2017), http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/03/08/15-17352.pdf.

8 Oral Argument, Digital Realty Trust Inc. v. Somers, No. 16-1276 (2017), https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-1276_i426.pdf.

9 Digital Realty, 583 U.S. at *9 (internal quotation omitted).

10 Id. (emphasis in original).

11 Id. at *14.

12 Id. at *14-15 (internal quotation omitted).

13 Id. at *15.

14 Id. at *10.

15 Id.

16 Id. at *11 (emphasis in original).

17 Id.

18 18 U.S.C. 1514A(b)(1)(A).

19 15 U.S.C. 78u-6(h)(1)(B(i).

20 18 U.S.C. 1514A(b)(2)D).

21 15 U.S.C. 78u-6(h)(1)(B)(iii).

22 18 U.S.C. 1514A(c)(2)(B).

23 15 U.S.C. 78u-6(h)(1)(C)(ii).

24 SEC Release, Former Company Insider Earns More Than $4.1 Million for Whistleblower Tip, Immediate Rel. No. 2017-222 (Dec. 5, 2017), https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2017-222.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions