India: Making Section 482 CrPC the sole remedy – Case Study of Madras High Court's judgment in K.Raghupathy v The Commissioner of Police

Last Updated: 14 September 2017
Article by Anuj Berry, Malak Bhatt and Sonali Malik

A Single Judge of the Madras High Court recently, in K. Raghupathy v The Commissioner of Police [Crl.O.P. SR.No. 28352 of 2017] on 10.07.17, held that a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code ("CrPC" or the "Code") for a direction to the police to register an FIR is maintainable, without exhausting the alternate remedies provided in the Code. 

Brief Background

The Petitioner in the aforesaid case, approached the Hon'ble High Court seeking a direction to the Police to register an FIR on the complaint filed by the Petitioner on 13.06.17. The Registry expressed doubts over the maintainability of the present petition in light of another order passed by a Single Judge of the Madras High Court in Sugesan Transport Pvt. Ltd v the Assistant Commissioner of Police [2016 5 CT 577], wherein it was held that such a direction cannot be passed under section 482 of the Code, till the Petitioner exhausts all the alternative remedies as provided in the code.

Section 482 CrPC is the inherent power of the High Court with respect to criminal proceedings and is reproduced below-

482. "Saving of inherent powers of High Court. Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or affect the inherent powers of the High Court to make such orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order under this Code, or to prevent abuse of the process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice."

Key Observations in K Raghupathy 

The Hon'ble High Court in the K. Raghupathy, observed that Section 482 CrPC, begins with a non-obstante clause and in view of the inherent power therein, there cannot be a total embargo on the High Court's "interminable jurisdiction". Simply put, this means that the availability of an alternate remedy under the Code, cannot prohibit the High Court to exercise its inherent power to secure the ends of justice, especially in light of a non-obstante clause. 

The Learned Single Judge, chiefly relied on principles enunciated in two cases of the  Supreme Court namely, Ramesh Kumari v State (N.CT. of Delhi): [2006 1 CTC 666] and Prabhu Chawla v State of Rajasthan : [CDJ 2016 SC 810].

The Apex Court in Ramesh Kumari, laid down that a ground of alternative remedy would be no substitute in law to refrain from registering a case when a complaint of a cognizable offence is reported to a police officer. Similarly, a Three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Prabhu Chawla's case held that even though a remedy under Section 397 CrPC exists i.e. revisionary powers of the sessions Court/High Court, it will not eclipse the inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC i.e. there cannot be a total bar on the exercise of the inherent powers where the "abuse of process of the Court, or other extra ordinary situation excites the court's jurisdiction".

On the strength of the above cases, the court in K. Raghupathy held that existence of alternative remedy in no way will abridge the power of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC.

Analysis of the aforesaid decision

At the outset, as per the Code, there is a procedural mechanism prescribed under the CrPC as a remedy available to a person who has a grievance that his complaint is not being registered by the police under Section 154(1) CrPC. Firstly, he may approach the Superintendent of Police under Section 154(3) CrPC.  If the Station House Officer as well as the Superintendent of Police, both refuse to register an FIR, he may under Section 156(3) CrPC, file an application to the concerned Magistrate and avail of his second alternate remedy.

The aforesaid decision of the Madras High Court has indeed raised interesting points in law, each one of them requiring a careful analysis. The analysis of each of the principles evolved by the Madras High Court in K Raghupathy is as follows-

  1. Principle of Exhaustion of Alternate Remedies before invoking Section 482 CrPC

As far as the maintainability of a Petition under Section 482 CrPC, for a direction to the Police to register an FIR on the complaint given by a party without the party exhausting the alternate remedies of the Code is concerned, the proposition has already been settled by Supreme Court in case of Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh [2008 2 SCC 409]. 

The judgement in Sakiri Vasu, in Para 26, has clearly laid the following-

"If a person has a grievance that his FIR has not been registered by the police station his first remedy is to approach the Superintendent of Police under Section 154(3) Cr.P.C. or other police officer referred to in Section 36 Cr.P.C. If despite approaching the Superintendent of Police or the officer referred to in Section 36 his grievance still persists, then he can approach a Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. instead of rushing to the High Court by way of a writ petition or a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Moreover he has a further remedy of filing a criminal complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. Why then should writ petitions or Section 482 petitions be entertained when there are so many alternative remedies?"

Further, the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu, relying on the Doctrine of Implied Power, even clarified the scope of the power of a Magistrate under Section 156(3) CrPC with respect to directing registration of an FIR, in the following words-

"In view of the abovementioned legal position, we are of the view that although Section 156(3) is very briefly worded, there is an implied power in the Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. to order registration of a criminal offence and /or to direct the officer in charge of the concerned police station to hold a proper investigation and take all such necessary steps that may be necessary for ensuring a proper investigation including monitoring the same. Even though these powers have not been expressly mentioned in Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., we are of the opinion that they are implied in the above provision."

Moreover, the Supreme Court in numerous judgements has held that the the inherent power of the High Court, under Section 482 CrPC, ought not to be invoked where there is a specific provision in the statute to redress the grievance of the aggrieved party. This statutory power has to be exercised sparingly with circumspection and in the rarest of rare cases. [See - Madhu Limaye v. State of Maharashtra: 1978CriLJ165 and Raj Kapoor v. State, Kurukshetra University and Anr. v. State of Haryana ]

It is stated that even though presence of alternate remedy does not put an absolute embargo on a petition under Section 482 CrPC, it is an equally well settled principle, that Courts should exercise self-restraint in such cases and the same ought to have been considered by the Madras High Court in the present case.

  1. Blurring the distinction between alternate remedy and procedural mechanism

While referring to the judgment in Prabhu Chawla's case to hold that the availability of an alternate remedy cannot be a bar to the inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC, the Madras High Court failed to consider that Prabhu Chawla's case pertained to a discussion regarding an alternate substantive remedy available under Section 397 CrPC while discussing the inherent powers available under Section 482 CrPC. In the said judgment, the Court held that a substantive remedy available under Section 397 CrPC against a judicial order passed by a criminal court cannot be a bar on approaching the High Court under Section 482 CrPC. However, the said ratio cannot be used to set at nought a procedural mechanism prescribed by the Code. By relying on Prabhu Chawla, the Madras High Court has rendered the mechanism prescribed under Section 154 (3) and 156 (3) otiose and given a complete go by to the statutory scheme prescribed under the CrPC.

Moreover, even while relying on Ramesh Kumari's case, the Court failed to consider the facts in the said case which show that the Petitioner in the said case had already approached the Station House Officer and the Commissioner of Police for filing of a complaint before approaching the High Court.


While the settled position of law states that the power under Section 482 CrPC cannot be resorted to if there is a specific provision in the CrPC for the redressal of grievance of the aggrieved party, the Madras High Court has given a go by to the procedure under Section 154/156 CrPC and given a higher pedestal to the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

It ought to be remembered that power under Section 482 CrPC, can be exercised only to "secure the ends of justice" and to prevent "the abuse of the process of court". However, such phraseology does not confer unlimited and arbitrary jurisdiction on the High Court. The High Court ought not to have by-passed the procedure prescribed in the CrPC in the wake of inherent powers of the Court, which in any case have to be sparingly exercised. Seen in light this, it will be interesting to see the number of cases that end up directly before the High Court for registration of an FIR and whether the Supreme Court sets right the defects in the Madras High Court's judgment.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions