Canada: Insureds Claiming "Diminished Value" Damages Under Ontario's OAP1 Auto Policy

Last Updated: October 20 2016
Article by Patricia J. Forte

"Does "damages" in its various manifestations in the OAP, the [Insurance] Act and the Statutory Conditions include Diminished Value? Is ...[an insured] estopped from claiming Diminished Value? Is this a contractual claim defined by the statutory policy or does the insurer stand in the place of the at fault tortfeasor?  Is this a collision claim which provides for strict "repair" on a contract or a claim where the insurer pays its own insured for the full gamut of damages, including Diminished Value?  Which section or sections of the OAP are applicable? Does the failure of ...[the insurer] to provide the mandated written notice regarding its election to repair deprive it of any rights?" 2

So queried Deputy Judge Prattas in the recent Small Claims Court decision Renwick v. Allstate Insurance Company of Canada. 3  The case dealt with the issue of whether the "diminished value" of an automobile following an accident is a proper cause of action for damages by an insured against his insurer.  The decision deals with the motion brought by the insurer, Allstate, to strike the claim and dismiss the action of the insured, Renwick, on the basis that it disclosed no reasonable cause of action.  The motion was dismissed.


Renwick owed a Jaguar that was involved in an accident in December 2014.  Renwick was not at fault for the accident.  Allstate ultimately chose to repair the vehicle.  Renwick maintained that Allstate was responsible to pay him the diminished value for his vehicle. 4  Allstate refused.

Renwick started the Small Claims Court action against Allstate maintaining that his luxury vehicle had sustained a "diminished value".  His position was that his vehicle was worth less after the repairs than it was before the accident.  He claimed that his vehicle now had a "stigma" from having been involved in an accident, and that its resale value has been reduced because of it. 

Renwick and Allstate agreed that their respective rights, duties and obligations are governed by the OAP1 Policy, the Insurance Act and its regulations.

Renwick took the position that the diminished value of his vehicle was a loss or damage covered by his auto policy, and for which he should be indemnified.  His position relied on case law adjudicated in jurisdictions outside of Ontario.  The foundation of Renwick's position was that diminished value is a common law right.  Nothing in the Insurance Act, its regulations, the OAP1 Policy or the Statutory Conditions, specifically exclude the payment of diminished value damages. 

Renwick relied, in part, on the broad wording in Section 6.2 of the policy, for example, requiring an insurer to:

" the cost of damage to the automobile, its equipment, contents and for loss of use of the automobile or contents arising from an accident for which another person would have been legally responsible in the absence of Section 263 of the Insurance Act (Ontario)." [Emphasis added.]

Renwick argued that the provisions of section 6.2 of the Policy do not eliminate an insurer's liability to pay for other uncompensated elements; "damage" covered in Section 6.2 includes the common law damage for "diminished value".

Renwick also argued that Allstate's failure to give written notice of its intention to repair the vehicle somehow compromised its position or obligations.

Allstate's position on the motion was that it had complied with its obligations under the policy and the Insurance Act.  The policy was a standard policy and contained the standard terms required by the Act and its regulations.  Allstate maintained that there is no obligation in the policy or the Act to provide coverage for "diminished value".  Allstate also argued that the "no fault" regime in Ontario prohibited all claims for diminished value. 

For reasons that are unclear, counsel focussed attention on Section 5 of the policy, which addresses "Uninsured Automobile Coverage".  Allstate also relied on the wording of the Statutory Conditions and maintained that its only obligation was to pay the lower of: (1) the cost to repair the loss or damage; or (2) the actual cash value of the vehicle at the time it was damaged.

Allstate concluded that the language of the policy is unambiguous and leaves no room for interpretation that the obligation of an insurer includes indemnity for the "diminished value" or stigma loss of a vehicle.


In his analysis of the submissions, Deputy Judge Prattas was persuaded that Renwick produced enough case law to show that the right to "diminished value" damages has been accepted in other common law provinces and that it may also exist in Ontario.  The Deputy Judge noted that the cases decided outside of Ontario were not binding, but they had persuasive value. Deputy Judge Prattas was also satisfied that there was sufficient evidence that there may in fact be a diminished value in Renwick's vehicle that has not been properly compensated by Allstate.  In the circumstances of the case, Deputy Judge Prattas concluded that there was a triable issue.  Deputy Judge Prattas dismissed Allstate's motion.  The action was permitted to proceed to trial.

It is important to note that Deputy Judge Prattas was not deciding the merits of the issue.  He simply noted that, for the purpose of the motion, there was a legitimate or genuine dispute justifying a trial.  It was not "plain and obvious" to him on the motion that there was no triable issue in the case to justify its dismissal. 

A key point in Deputy Judge Prattas' determination appears to have been the effect of the no-fault scheme itself.  Though the no fault regime in Ontario prohibits all tort actions for recovery of property damages against a negligent party, the right of an insured to sue his insurer for "damages" to his automobile is preserved in section 263(5)(a), which reads, in part:

" insured has no right of action against any person involved in the incident other than the insured's insurer for damages to the insured's automobile or its contents or for loss of use..." [Emphasis added.]

Deputy Judge Prattas ceded the possibility that the reference to "damages", broadly interpreted, could include "diminished value" damages as contemplated by common law. 

What Insurers Should Know

The case lacks an in-depth consideration of the complex legislative and regulatory scheme and history. There is no reference to the modern approach to statutory and policy interpretation that requires the adoption of an interpretation that complies with the legislative text, promotes the legislative purpose, and produces a reasonable and sensible meaning.6

For example, the apparent broad wording of section 263(5)(a) of the Insurance Act needs to be juxtaposed with the specific wording of the OAP1 Policy.  The Policy is the indemnifying agreement. Moreover, the preamble of the section 8 - Statutory Conditions 5 contain a paramountcy clause, which states, in part:

"... If there is a discrepancy between these conditions and the wording in the policy these conditions prevail."

Paragraph 6(5) of the Statutory Conditions specifies a limit to an insurer's liability:

"The insurer shall not be liable for more than the actual cash value of the automobile at the time any loss or damage occurs, and the loss or damage shall be ascertained or estimated according to the actual cash value with proper deduction for depreciation, however caused, and shall not exceed the amount that it would cost to repair or replace the automobile..."

Counsel representing Renwick advises that the case resolved prior to trial, and so the issue lives on to be judicially determined in another case. 

There has been a surge of cases dealing with the concept of recovery for "diminished value" damages in Ontario.  Renwick is the first contemporary case in Ontario about which the author is aware where a claim for diminished value is made in the context of a first party claim by an insured against an insurer.  The case suggests that upon cursory review of the issue, the answer to the question of first party recovery for "diminished value" is "maybe". The prediction is that upon a more comprehensive review of the issue, the answer will be a definitive "no".


1. Cue scary music.

2. Renwick v Allstate Insurance Company of Canada, 2016 CanLII 44178 (ON SCSM), para 32.

3. supra.

4. A claim that Renwick initiated against the at-fault driver was dismissed, presumably because of the "no-fault" scheme set out in section 263 of the Insurance Act. Refer to my previous blog on point: "The Worth of "Diminished Value" Claims in Ontario"

5. See: Segnitz v. Royal & Sun Alliance Assurance Co. of Canada, [2005] O.J. No. 2436 ONCA, paras 60 - 63

6. OAP1 Policy, section 8.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions