United States: Tax Court Rules On Inclusion Of Stock-Based Compensation Costs In Cost-Sharing Agreements

In Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, 145 T.C. No. 3 (2015), the Tax Court struck down 2003 Treasury Regulations (T.D. 9088) (the "2003 Regulations") requiring that taxpayers include stock-based compensation costs in the expenses of qualified cost-sharing arrangements.


The 2003 Regulations

In 2002, Treasury issued a notice of proposed rulemaking and a notice of public hearing relating to proposed amendments to the 1995 Regulations. In response, a number of organizations submitted comments informing Treasury that in arm's-length transactions between unrelated parties the parties do not pay or reimburse each other for amounts attributable to stock-based compensation. Commentators stated that they knew of no transactions between unrelated parties that required one party to pay or reimburse another for amounts related to stock-based compensation. In addition, certain commentators conducted searches of the EDGAR system and found no cost-sharing agreements between unrelated parties in which the parties agreed to share either the exercise spread or grant date of stock-based compensation. Commentators also identified multiple arm's-length agreements in which the parties did not share stock-based compensation. Finally, commentators explained that from an economic perspective unrelated parties would not agree to share costs of stock-based compensation because the value of stock-based compensation is speculative, potentially large, and is outside the control of the parties. However, despite the commentary provided to Treasury, the 2003 Regulations explicitly required parties to qualified cost-sharing agreements to share stock-based compensation costs.


Previously, in Xilinx, Inc. v. Commissioner, 598 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2010), the Ninth Circuit, affirming the Tax Court's decision, ruled against the Service's interpretation of the 1995 cost-sharing Treasury Regulations (the "1995 Regulations"). The Service argued that under the 1995 cost-sharing Treasury Regulations, which did not specifically address stock-based compensation, taxpayers must include stock-based compensation costs in the pool of costs shared in a qualified cost-sharing agreement. However, the Ninth Circuit rejected the Service's argument and held that stock-based compensation does not need to be included in the pool of costs. The Ninth Circuit reasoned that unrelated parties operating at arm's length do not share such costs, and therefore the Service's attempt to allocate such costs is contrary to the dominant purpose of the statute, which is parity between taxpayers in uncontrolled transactions and controlled transactions.

Tax Court's Ruling in Altera

Altera Corp. and its Cayman Island subsidiary, Altera International, entered into a research and development cost-sharing agreement. Altera Corp. paid stock-based compensation to certain employees, but such stock-based compensation was not included in the cost pool under the cost-sharing agreement. The Service asserted that the failure to include the costs relating to stock-based compensation violated the 2003 Regulations. Altera Corp. challenged the validity of 2003 Regulations.

Standard of Review

The Tax Court first addressed the standard of review, concluding that the 2003 Regulations are legislative rules, and therefore the notice and comment requirements of Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"). The Tax Court also concluded that the 2003 Regulations must satisfy the reasoned decisionmaking standard set forth in Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Ass'n v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 463 U.S. 29 (1983) ("State Farm").

Validity of the 2003 Regulations

The Tax Court's analysis focused on whether Treasury, through empirical analysis, had reasonably determined that the 2003 Regulations were consistent with the arm's length standard. The preamble to the 2003 Regulations indicates that Treasury relied on its belief that related parties entering into cost-sharing agreements to develop "high profit intangibles" would share stock-based compensation costs if such costs were a "significant element" of the compensation. Yet the requirement under the 2003 Regulations that taxpayers share stock-based compensation costs applies whether or not such agreements relate to developing "high profit intangibles" or whether such costs are a "significant element" of the compensation. Treasury defended this rule by arguing that it eased administrative burdens. However, the Tax Court rejected this argument because Treasury failed to provide any explanation of its decision in the preamble. Further, Treasury did not disclose its factual findings on the matter, so the Tax Court would not be able to evaluate whether Treasury's conclusion was reasonable.

In addition, the Tax Court stated that Treasury failed to respond to significant comments submitted by commenters in connection with the 2002 notice of proposed rulemaking. The Tax Court noted, "[a]lthough Treasury's failure to respond to an isolated comment or two would probably not be fatal to the final rule, Treasury's failure to meaningfully respond to numerous relevant and significant comments certainly is." The Tax Court also concluded that the 2003 Regulations relating to stock-based compensation are contrary to the evidence before Treasury when it issued the 2003 Regulations, based on Treasury's failure to cite any evidence supporting its belief that unrelated parties to qualified cost-sharing agreements would share stock-based compensation costs and Treasury's failure to respond to significant evidence submitted by commentators showing that unrelated parties would not share such costs and providing economic analysis explaining why unrelated parties would be unwilling to share such costs.

The Tax Court ruled in favor of Altera Corp., concluding that the stock-based compensation rules in the 2003 Regulations failed to satisfy State Farm's reasoned decisionmaking standard for the following reasons : (1) Treasury failed to connect the choices it made in the 2003 Regulations with the facts found because the stock-based compensation rules issued by Treasury lacked any basis in fact, (2) Treasury failed to respond to significant comments when it issued the stock-based compensation rules and (3) Treasury's conclusion that the stock-based compensation rules are consistent with the arm's length standard is contrary to all evidence before it. Accordingly, the Tax Court declared that the stock-based compensation rules in the 2003 Regulations are invalid.

Tax Court Rules on Inclusion of Stock-Based Compensation Costs in Cost-Sharing Agreements

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions