United States: § 102(b) On-Sale Bar Does Not Require An Invention To Be Ready For Patenting When Offered For Sale

This article previously appeared in Last Month at the Federal Circuit, September 2011

Judges: Dyk, Moore (author), O'Malley

[Appealed from D. Minn., Chief Judge Davis]

In August Technology Corp. v. Camtek, Ltd., No. 10-1458 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 22, 2011), the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded for further proceedings. The Court affirmed the district court's denials of JMOL and a new trial on invalidity, while also affirming the district court's dismissal of Camtek, Ltd.'s ("Camtek") inequitable conduct defense and counterclaim. Finding the district court erred in its claim construction of the term "wafer," the Court vacated the district court's judgment of infringement, its award of damages, and its grant of a permanent injunction, and remanded for further proceedings.

August Technology Corporation and Rudolph Technologies, Inc. (collectively "August Tech") sued Camtek for infringing claims 1 and 3 of U.S. Patent No. 6,826,298 ("the '298 patent"). A jury found that Camtek literally infringed both claims, the infringement was not willful, and awarded damages. The jury also found Camtek failed to prove the asserted claims were obvious, and that August Tech's NSX-80 device was not on sale prior to the critical date of the '298 patent. The district court then permanently enjoined Camtek from making, using, selling, and offering for sale its infringing Falcon machines. The district court also held that there was no need for a separate trial on inequitable conduct, since the jury found that the NSX-80 device was not prior art. The district court then denied Camtek's post-trial motions for JMOL or a new trial on infringement, damages, and obviousness.

Claims 1 and 3 of the '298 patent are directed to a system and a method for inspecting integrated circuits printed on substrates such as wafers. The claim construction of the district court focused on two claim limitations, "wafer" and "strobes . . . based on velocity." The first claim construction dispute centered upon whether a "wafer" is also a "plurality of wafers." The district court construed a wafer to be "a thin slice of semiconductor material with circuitry thereon that is ready for electrical testing, or any part thereof. However, a 'wafer' is not the same as a 'die.'" Slip op. at 5 (citation omitted). The district court further explained that a "wafer should be construed to include a part of a wafer. Throughout the patent, reference is made to wafers, in whole or in part." Id. (citation omitted). The district court also explained that this definition does not improperly give the same meaning to "die" and "wafer" because it requires the wafer or portion of a wafer to include multiple dies. Since the claim included a "plurality of known good quality wafers" limitation, the district court's construction allowed a single wafer to be a plurality of wafers.

On appeal, the Federal Circuit began its review with the claim language itself. Though the claims' preambles listed example "wafers," the Court could not conclude that wafers were not discrete objects. The Court found the claim itself distinguished between a single wafer and multiple wafers, where it uses "a wafer" and "a plurality of . . . wafers." Other claims of the '298 patent lent further support that a single wafer is not also multiple wafers. Claims 18 and 26 required "each and every wafer" to be aligned at the exact same location and orientation. The Court noted that if a wafer included a plurality of wafers, then some of the wafers could not be aligned to the exact same location. The '298 patent specification consistently treated wafers as discrete objects. Based upon these readings, the Court concluded that "a wafer is a discrete object, and thus a single wafer, even though it may later be diced into hundreds of separate dies, is not itself also a plurality of wafers." Id. at 10.




"The issue presented in this case is whether the invention must be ready for patenting at the time the alleged offer is made. We conclude that it does not." Slip op. at 17.




The Court rejected assertions by August Tech that this claim construction was incorrect because it excluded the preferred embodiment. "The mere fact that there is an alternative embodiment disclosed in the [asserted patent] that is not encompassed by [our] claim construction does not outweigh the language of the claim, especially when the court's construction is supported by the intrinsic evidence." Id. at 11 (alterations in original) (quoting TIP Sys., LLC v. Phillips & Brooks/Gladwin, Inc., 529 F.3d 1364, 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2008)). This is "especially true where, as here, other unasserted claims in the parent patent cover the excluded embodiments." Id.

The Court construed a "wafer" as "a thin, discrete slice of semiconductor material with circuitry thereon that is ready for electrical testing having one or more dies. A plurality of wafers means more than one physically distinct wafer." Id. at 11-12. Based upon the district court's flawed claim construction, the infringement verdict was vacated and remanded for a limited trial on infringement with respect to this claim element.

The district court additionally construed the claim limitation "strobes . . . based on velocity." The district court found the limitation to require strobing based at least in part on "the rate of change of the position of the wafer." Id. at 12 (citation omitted). As long as the strobing was based upon the wafer's velocity, it did not matter whether the strobing also depended upon the wafer's position. Both parties agreed that the claimed invention periodically strobed based on a wafer's velocity. Camtek argued that the asserted claims precluded strobing based on the wafer's position, because August Tech disclaimed that during prosecution.

The Federal Circuit found no clear disavowal of strobing according to position during prosecution and agreed with the district court's construction of strobing based on velocity. The Court also rejected an argument by Camtek that no evidence supported the jury's verdict of infringement with respect to the strobing limitation. The Court found no error in the district court's analysis and concluded that "the jury was presented with substantial evidence that the Falcon strobes [were] based on the rate of change of the position of the wafer." Id. at 14. Accordingly, the Court did not direct the district court to include the strobing limitation in its retrial on infringement.

The Court also reviewed the jury's finding that Camtek failed to show that the asserted claims would have been obvious by clear and convincing evidence over U.S. Patent Nos. 5,859,698 and 5,298,963. The district court denied Camtek's motion for JMOL, finding there was substantial evidence that the cited prior art failed to teach the strobing limitation. The Court agreed that there was substantial evidence, including expert testimony, supporting the jury's fact-finding and affirmed the denial of a JMOL and a new trial on the issue.

The jury also found August Tech's NSX-80 wafer inspection machine was not on sale prior to the critical date of the '298 patent, causing the district court to dismiss Camtek's inequitable conduct charges based on nondisclosure of the NSX-80. The district court also denied JMOL and a new trial on invalidity for obviousness. Though the Court could not rule on whether the NSX-80 constituted prior art, the Court affirmed and noted no need for a retrial on the issue of whether the NSX-80 was on sale prior to the critical date.

Camtek argued that the district court erred as a matter of law in the jury instructions, where it defined "on sale" to mean the NSX-80 must have been ready for patenting at the time an alleged offer for sale was made. The Federal Circuit first considered whether the NSX-80 qualified as § 102(b) prior art. The Court used a two-part test for determining whether the § 102(b) on-sale bar applies: (1) the product is the subject of a commercial offer for sale, and (2) the invention is ready for patenting. Id. at 16 (citing Pfaff v. Wells Elecs., Inc., 525 U.S. 55, 67 (1998)). The key issue was whether the invention must be ready for patenting at the time the alleged offer is made. The Court concluded it does not.

The Court noted that requiring that an invention must be ready for patenting at the time of an offer for sale would render the second prong of Pfaff "superfluous." Id. at 17. Citing Robotic Vision Systems v. View Engineering, Inc., 249 F.3d 1307, 1313 (Fed. Cir. 2001), the Court noted that completion of the invention prior to the critical date pursuant to an offer to sell would create a bar. While an invention need not be ready for patenting, the Court held that "there is no offer for sale until such time as the invention is conceived." Slip op. at 18. Before that conception date, the seller is merely offering to sell an idea for a product.

Because the record on appeal was not clear as to whether August Tech conceived of the NSX-80 prior to the critical date, the Court left that question of fact to be decided by a fact-finder in the first instance. Nor could the Court evaluate whether the jury based their decision on the experimental use exception, as argued by August Tech. The Court did note the NSX-80 did not disclose the claimed strobing limitation, which was the missing element for purposes of the obviousness analysis. The Court concluded that even if the NSX-80 was on sale and prior art, as a matter of law based on the undisputed facts, it would not render the asserted claims obvious in view of the prior art. On this basis, the Court affirmed the district court's denial of JMOL and a new trial on invalidity for obviousness. This same reasoning led the Court to conclude that the NSX-80 is not material prior art and affirmed the district court's dismissal of Camtek's inequitable conduct counterclaims.

Since the Court vacated and remanded for further proceedings under the correct claim construction, the Court did not reach the parties' contentions regarding damages and the permanent injunction.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions