Meet our United States: Telemarketing Experts

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP (KMT) advises clients on a wide range of issues relating to the development and operation of telemarketing businesses.

Compliance.  KMT’s experienced attorneys review, revise and provide counsel in connection with the scripts, SMS/call flows, call center operations/practices and other business practices of telemarketing companies to ensure compliance with ever-changing regulations, including:

  • the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA);
  • the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR); 
  • state telemarketing laws;
  • state and federal Do-Not-Call laws; and
  • Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA) and Mobile Marketing Association (MMA) guidelines. 

Litigation.  KMT offers a full range of highly effective litigation services to address the legal and regulatory matters that arise from time to time in connection with telemarketing ventures including, but not limited to, TCPA class action lawsuits.  KMT’s telemarketing lawyers regularly appear on behalf of clients before:

  • the Federal Communications Commission (FCC);
  • the Federal Trade Commission (FTC);
  • attorneys general;
  • public utilities commissions; and
  • state and federal courts across the nation.

Transactions/Contracts.  KMT understands that effective and well-drafted contracts are the keystones of a successful business relationship.  The firm’s experienced transactional attorneys draft, review, revise and negotiate a wide range of contracts and other documentation for KMT’s telemarketing clients, including:

  • TCPA telemarketing consent language;
  • Telemarketing scripts;
  • Call Center and Telemarketing Agreements;
  • Telemarketing Lead Generation Agreements;
  • Call Transfer Agreements;
  • Billing Aggregator Agreements;
  • Telemarketing List Management Agreements; and
  • SMS Marketing Agreements.

~~~~~

KMT has developed an unparalleled track record of achieving successful results for its telemarketing clients on a cost-effective, time-sensitive basis.  You can learn more about the firm’s telemarketing practice on its website.  You can also visit KMT’s blog for timely, reliable and practical analysis of legal issues relevant to telemarketers. 

We can count on KMT for insightful feedback, judgment and guidance.

KMT’s comprehensive knowledge of the TCPA, ATSR and CASL, along with their pragmatic approach, has added tremendous value to AcademixDirect’s business. We can count on KMT for insightful feedback, judgment and guidance for complex compliance issues. The outstanding results we have obtained from David, Sean and Jonathan’s services truly make them the “Pros from Dover” for all things telemarketing.

- Phillip G. Connolly, Chief Financial Officer, AcademixDirect

Constantly ahead of the industry in knowledge.

KMT has been an amazing resource for QualityHealth, advising us on legal matters related to our digital marketing. They have provided us with standards and best practices across a suite of product offerings, with each task executed with extreme detail. From ad copy to TCPA compliance, they’ve been a great asset, constantly ahead of the industry in knowledge and providing us with feedback in record time. We highly recommend working with KMT.

- Michael Amsel, Vice President of Media, QualityHealth

Our Experts
 
Name
Expertise
Phone
 
Managing Partner
+1 212 246 0900 
Latest MAC Documents
View All MAC Documents
Contributor Latest Articles
In February of this year, legislation was initiated to expand the existing California anti-spam law to provide stricter requirements applicable to any person or entity initiating or advertising...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently rendered a decision based on the State of Washington's gamling law.
Last week, a federal district court in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts denied a motion to dismiss based on personal jurisdiction in a website accessibility lawsuit brought under Title III of the Americans ...
In early March, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") issued a notice indicating that it is proposing to address the issue of Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") liability...
Earlier this year, a federal district court in the State of Illinois certified a class action sweepstakes lawsuit in which an Illinois consumer alleged that HMI Industries, Inc., TD Bank, and A-1 Allergy Relief, Inc. violated the Illinois Prizes and Gifts Act, 815 ILCS 525/1, et seq. ("Prizes and Gifts Act"), Illinois Consumer Fraud and Abuse Act ("ICFA"), the Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), and the Federal Truth in Lending Act.
The New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act ("CFA") protects consumers against unconscionable and fraudulent practices in the marketplace.
The reasonableness of consent revocation was one of four issues addressed in the recent decision on appeal of the Federal Communications Commission's ("FCC") Telephone Consumer Protection Act 2015 Order ...
Given this unique role, End User License Agreements are absolutely vital in terms of protecting mobile app providers and the technology/intellectual property associated with the subject app.
Late last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued its long-awaited decision on the challenge to the FCC's 2015 Order interpreting the TCPA.
On March 5, 2018, a motion to dismiss a fax class action lawsuit brought under the TCPA, as amended by the Junk Fax Prevention Act, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois was denied.