Argentina: ARGENTINA VS. ICSID: Unconstitutionality of the BITs and ICSID Jurisdiction - the Potential New Government Defenses Against the Enforcement of the ICSID Arbitral Award - Issues That May Subject the Award to Revision by the Argentine Judiciary.

Last Updated: 17 May 2005

Article by Carlos E. Alfaro and Pedro Lorenti from Alfaro-Abogados

The International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) will be one of the main topics of political discussions during 2005 in Argentina. The first ICSID award decision on a case involving issues of compensation for devaluation and pesification of tariffs has been rendered against Argentina (CMS case May 2005). Enforcement of these awards may affect what otherwise would apparently be a successful renegotiation of both the bond-holders debt and the debt with the IMF. It would create economic uncertainty and affect the rebound of the economy at a crucial moment. The Government is preparing a strategy that could allow it to subject the review of the ICSID awards to the courts of Argentina.

To structure an adequate defense that may defuse the negative effects of potential adverse awards is vital for the present Government. Analyzing the theories being discussed by Government officials seems therefore to be appropriate. Some of the criteria followed by the Argentine government were already discussed in "ICSID Arbitration and BITs Challenged by the Argentina Government", December 2005; published by and "ICSID Energy-Related Arbitration Cases Against Argentina Revisited", February 2004 in the Latin America Energy Report (World Trade Executive, Inc.). In this paper we will analyze the challenge to the constitutionality of BITs and ICSID awards which is being formulated in Argentina.

The initial approach.

The position originally adopted –and still held- by the Argentine Attorney General’s Office in charge of the country’s defense at ICSID, rests on a basic principle of Argentine Constitutional law: that international treaties are subordinated to the Argentine Constitution. This rule was in force under our originally enacted Constitution (1853-1860), and has been kept, clarified and somehow expanded the 1994 constitutional reform. In effect Article 27 of the 1853 original text of the Constitution and not amended in 1994- states that "The Federal Government is required to consolidate peace and commercial relations with foreign powers by means of treaties that shall be subject to the public law principles set forth in this Constitution", and Article 75, section 22, 1st paragraph, amended in 1994-, empowers the National Congress to "Approve or reject the treaties executed with other nations and with international organizations and the agreements with the Holy See. The treaties and agreements supersede the laws".

Pursuant to these constitutional clauses, the ICSID agreement is deemed a treaty with an international organization that shall be subject to the public law principles of Argentine Constitutional law. Since the ICSID treaty has already been granted the Congressional’ approval–by means of its enactment by law 24,353 on August, 1994-, Congress could not be blamed should it take on these grounds. However, the requirement to abide with public law constitutional principles applies to the whole system, i.e. to the treaty and to its products, such as the awards issued under the ICSID rules.

The main consequence of this legal construction is to forestall the ICSID’s principle, requiring the direct enforceability of its awards within the territory of the country member’s countries: is the award’s full compliance with domestic public law principles has to be checked first.

The door is open, therefore, for local authorities in Argentina, its Judiciary- to review the ICSID awards- and to decide whether or not they should be enforced. Obviously, "the public law principles set forth in this Constitution", as article 27 states, encompass standards closely linked to concepts like "sovereignty" and "state of emergency". Legal grounds could thus be found to block those ICSID awards that may affect the Government’s decisions adopted within the framework of said concepts.

The latest theory

The most challenging new theory that is being harbored these days establishes that both the treaties that were signed subjecting certain disputes to arbitration and the system of ICSID are unconstitutional because they are violating the process established under the 1994 reform of the National Constitution. The reasoning under this theory goes as follows:

As we mentioned above, although ICSID was created in March 1965, Argentina only adhered to it through Law 24,353 dated July 28, 1994, promulgated on August 22, 1994 and published in the Official Gazette on September 2, 1994. These dates are important, because at the same time, by August 22, 1994 the above- mentioned Constitutional reform was enacted and entered into force on August 24, 1994. Through article 75, section 24, 1st paragraph, the Argentine Constitution empowered the Congress to "approve" treaties delegating powers and jurisdiction to supranational bodies.

In this regard, there is a special procedure for the approval. An absolute majority of the present members of each Congressional Chamber shall state the convenience of entering into the Treaty and, after a 120 day term, it shall be approved again by an absolute majority of the members of each Chamber.

Thus, according to this new theory an unusual legal situation has taken place. Law 24,353 followed the parliamentary procedure set forth in the 1853/1860 Constitution. But since it was published after the 1994 Constitutional amendment entered into force, it is argued that it did not complete its validity requirements under the new system. Therefore, the assignment of sovereignty implied by the ICSID arbitral powers should also have gone through the new process of approval regulated in article 75, section 24 of the 1994 Constitution. As said procedure was never followed, any arbitration carried out by the ICSID against Argentina could be declared null and void by a domestic court.

But this theory makes another turn of the screw: it also ascertains that treaties delegating "competence and jurisdiction" to international bodies –such as the ICSID-, executed before the 1994 Constitutional reform, have became null and void with its enactment. The reason is that the new rules set forth to delegate such powers –i.e. the two congressional approvals, etc.- are mandatory. Since the clauses of an international agreement –of this kind- cannot prevail over an article of the National Constitution, they became extinguished as soon as the constitutional article that contradicts them entered into force.

As a consequence, in none of the current cases is the ICSID empowered to render a valid decision against Argentina. With the special law required by the 1994 Argentine Constitution finally enacted, it would only regulate future cases and not those already filed.

The fact that said nullity has not been claimed so far, does not prevent the Government from invoking it in the future: as a nullity an inherent defect that cannot be cured. The enforceability of an article of the National Constitution does not depend on whether the Government argues about it or not.

Conclusion. Both theories share a common ground: that the direct enforceability of the ICSID awards in Argentina is contrary to its constitution, and that these awards are subject to prior constitutional control by the competent authorities in Argentina and the Judiciary.

The first theory is a development of this principle by means of the legal construction of old constitutional clauses still in force together with some others enacted in 1994. Its aim is mainly procedural: to undoubtedly establish the jurisdiction of local courts for reviewing the ICSID awards. Though the reason for said review is the protection of domestic "public law principles", nothing specific is advanced as to the content of these principles, a matter to be resolved by the courts.

The second theory entails a more "radical" approach. It not only maintains the domestic courts’ jurisdiction –thus answering the procedural question-, but also furnishes them with some legal grounds to declare the ICSID awards’ unconstitutional at the least because the ICSID treaty was not approved pursuant to the 1994 Constitution; and at the most because the 1994 Constitution abrogated all the former treaties awarding jurisdiction to international bodies.

The opportunity to introduce any of these subjects will depend on the strategy to be adopted by the Government. Should it try (i) to get an ICSID award acknowledging any of these doctrines –which is unlikely- or (ii) which is more likely to rely on the domestic courts to nullify the awards’ and to block their enforcement.

It is not a wild guess to assume that the Argentine Judiciary, presided over by a new Supreme Court with the majority of its members appointed by this Government, may rule in favor of these positions, particularly if the Government convinces the people and the Judiciary of the economic hardship for its society resulting from enforcing an award which would force Argentina to compensate the investors.

We will undertake a deeper study of both theories’ legal grounds in future papers. Knowledge of the issues at stake will assist the players involved in ICSID disputes in properly assessing and deciding the issues at stake.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions