Argentina: ICSID Arbitration And BITs Challenged By the Argentine Government

Last Updated: 21 December 2004
Article by Carlos E. Alfaro


The clear possibility of Argentina loosing in the majority of the current more than thirty arbitration cases filed before ICSID has moved the Government to build a two tier strategy of defense. One line of action is being developed at the local Federal Supreme Court level by a decision in a local case that has broaden the possibility of judicial review of arbitral awards. Another at political level by challenging the validity of the BIT arbitration clauses and of ICSID jurisdiction in the media and by introducing legislation changing the legal framework for privatized concessions of public services prohibiting in the future the submission of disputes under contracts to foreign jurisdiction.


The economic crisis of 2001 threw the country into chaos and Argentina defaulted in the payment of its foreign debt. Bank deposits and all credit/obligations denominated in foreign currency under local law were converted into pesos. Public services’ tariffs were frozen. These measures have had serious implications not only for investors awarded with concession contracts but also for all investors that trusted in an economic stability and a legal framework that was later substantially changed. Many of these investments were made under the umbrella of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) which provided arbitration as the valid mechanism to solve any arising dispute.

As a result of all of the above and the delay of the successive governments in finding a solution to allow investors to minimize the effects of the pesification, many of them brought theirs claims against Argentine Federal and Provincial Governments before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). In some cases arbitration claims were filed to improve the standing of the companies in future renegotiations of their contracts.

Many of the cases before ICSID involve companies in charge of concessions of public services that were privatized during the nineties. Investment returns were tied up to a tariff that now has been substantially reduced by the devaluation and the Government has prohibited any adjustments even in pesos. Others involve investors that trusted a legal framework that promises that their investments were guaranteed in dollars at a rate of one local peso to one dollar.


The following is a list of all the cases filed with the ICSID taking into account the different activities involved:

  • Water: (1) Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal; (2) Azurix Corp.; (3) Saur International; (4) Aguas Provinciales de Santa Fe S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Interaguas Servicios Integrales de Agua S.A.; (5) Aguas Cordobesas S.A., Suez, and Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona; (6) Aguas Argentinas S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A.
  • Gas: (7) Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets L.P.; (8) CMS Gas Transmission Company; (9) LG&E Energy Corporation, LG&E Capital Corporation and LG&E International Inc.; (10) Sempra Energy International; (11) Camuzzi International S.A.; (12) Gas Natural SDG S.A.; (13) Total S.A.;
  • Oil: (14) Pioneer Natural Resources Company, Pioneer Natural Resources (Argentina) S.A. and Pioneer Natural Resources (Tierra del Fuego) S.A.; (15) Pan American Energy LLC and BP Argentina Exploration Company; (16) El Paso Energy International Company; (17) BP America Production Company and others; (18) Wintershall Aktiengesellschaft; (19) Mobil Exploration and Development Inc. Suc. Argentina and Mobil Argentina S.A.
  • Electricity: (20) AES Corporation; (21) Camuzzi International S.A.; (22) Enersis S.A.; (23) Electricidad Argentina S.A. and EDF International S.A.; (24) EDF International S.A., SAUR International S.A., and Léon Participaciones Argentinas S.A.;
  • Information Services: (25) Siemens A. G.; (26) Unisys Corporation;
  • Motor vehicle enterprise: (27) Metalpar S.A. and Buen Aire S.A.
  • Telecommunications: (28) Telefónica S.A.; (29) France Telecom S.A.
  • Leasing: (30) CIT Group Inc.;
  • Insurance: (31) Continental Casualty Company.

A relevant fact is that the above cases involve companies from the main investor countries in the world: France, Spain, USA, UK, Italy and Germany. The list is impressive and shows the global impact of the challenges ahead for Argentina: how to forcefully rebut the charges without affecting future new investments.

Government Strategy

The Argentine government faced with the possibility of loosing most of the cases has launched a campaign against the validity of the BIT provisions and of the finality of an award rendered under the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes. In this effort it has threatened to investigate the concessions as to the level of compliance by the privatized companies with the investments agreed upon in the contracts. Apparently the strength of this position is based on the assumption that the majority of these companies did not comply with the contractual conditions of the concession. The objective: to force the companies to withdraw the claim under arbitration if they want to renegotiate their contracts.

But the strategy goes beyond these efforts. Argentina is also presenting a series of arguments at the arbitration cases under BIT provisions and is also launching a direct attack against their validity and enforceability of the award when the case involves concessions of public services.

Federal Supreme Court position

Recently, after the Government succeeded in changing the composition of the Supreme Court, this one has sustained coincidentally with the position of the Administration that when matters of public policy are involved, local Courts may review the reasonability, fairness and constitutionality of an award.

In a recent court decision ("Jose Cartellone Construcciones vs. Hidroelectrica Norpatagonica S.A.) the Federal Supreme Court of Argentina decided that local courts could review an arbitral award even when the parties involved have specifically agreed to waive the right of appeal.

The case’s holding rules that the Supreme Court has the right to review arbitral awards if "unconstitutional", "unreasonable" or "illegal", even when the parties involved have specifically agreed to waive the right to appeal.

This decision reaffirms the Supreme Court’s role of "guardian" of the Constitution and of public policy, even in those cases that have been previously submitted to arbitrators and where judicial review has not been admitted by the parties. The question was whether the parties can decide on matters of public policy.

This Supreme Court’s sentence overturns a prior Commercial Court of Appeals’ decision rejecting a nullity appeal against the arbitral award, on the ground that the waiver of judicial review cannot be effective as long as the arbitrator’s decision breaches the public policy of the country (whether through an unconstitutional, unreasonable or illegal award).

Contrary to that argument, the Court of Appeals had considered Respondent’s arguments to be aimed at reviewing the fairness or equity of the award; both issues are not capable of having being analyzed through a nullity appeal.

The award required the respondent (a former state hydroelectric company) to pay the claimant (a State contractor) an amount for the adjustment of a credit and the application of legal interest rates.

The interpretation of the Supreme Court as to whether the facts under dispute involve a matter of "public policy" is relevant due to the fact that most of the cases before ICSID challenges the right of the Argentine government to devalue its currency under investment protection treaties (a matter of public policy in the position of the Government). In order to support the decision, the Supreme Court also invoked a Civil Code’s provision (Art. 872) through which "rights granted with aim at public policy cannot be waived". With this argument, the Court rejected the possibility of any parties’ agreement that may limit review over matters of public policy. The question arising at this point is whether an award resolving (even wrongfully) on interests rates jeopardizes the Argentine public policy. This always appears as a very complex issue in arbitration, especially when attempting enforcement.

The Supreme Court, by considering an ordinary issue (a disagreement over interest rates) in breach of Argentine public policy is opening a wide door to quash potential arbitral awards related to the "pesification" or to issues like "changing the formula to adjust tariffs agreed in the privatization contracts" . Such a broad interpretation of the issues (through which almost every decision could be considered in violation of public policy) is contrary to a proper interpretation of international treaties.

Argentine Government legal arguments

Argentine prosecutor has also argued in a hearing under ICSID arbitration in Paris (CMS Gas Transmission Company vs. Republica Argentina) mainly that:

  1. Bilateral treaties do not supersede the National Constitution and therefore a company can not invoke such treaty to avoid trying the case in Argentina before local courts and violate the right of defense in court of the Argentine State.
  2. A company that is engaged in the rendering of public services can not impose a limitation on the sovereign right of the government to change its economic policy or the tariffs

The prosecutor has also conducted a public campaign advocating the re-adoption of the Calvo and Drago doctrines and attacking the BITs, the arbitration clauses and ICSID as a principle. He has stated that Argentina should never again compromise the result of a contractual dispute to a system of the characteristics of ICSID, which is not an institution by itself.

In conjunction with these efforts the Government has sent a draft of a bill to Congress establishing a new legal framework to the concession of public services. The concession contracts would be subject to local law and courts, eliminating the possibility of submitting any disputes to outside sources.


The future does not look promising for BITs or for ICSID development. Developed countries enthusiastically supported open markets and privatization during the nineties in the belief that private investments will flow and improve the standard of living of their people. In implementing the legal framework necessary to attract foreign investments they entered into BITs and agreed to submit any controversy to foreign arbitration.

When confronting a crisis like in the case of Argentina in 2001, private parties in many cases rushed to file their arbitral demands to better position themselves for negotiations. It has not caused the desired effect. Much to the contrary Governments has reacted negatively and ICSID runs now the risk of becoming politically "out of fashion". The number of cases filed has produced a backlash for the future. Countries are now less willing to accept submitting themselves to arbitration and foreign jurisdiction.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions